This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Was The League Of Nations A Success Or A Failure?

3786 words - 15 pages

After the First World War everyone wanted to avoid repetition of the mass slaughter of the war that had just ended. US was horrified by such an act, therefore, President Woodrow Wilson suggested an international body whose sole purpose was to maintain World peace. Before 1920 there was no such organization or place where the national Delegates could meet up and try to talk their way through their problems. After the War with great number of deaths, this idea was liked by almost everyone. Its main task was to sort out international disputes whenever they occurred. The League aimed to discourage aggression from any nation, to encourage countries to co-operate, especially in business and trade, to encourage nations to disarm, to improve the living and working conditions of people in all parts of the world.The headquarters of the League was based in Geneva, Switzerland. There where no disputes here as this was and is a neutral country and did not take part in the WWI. This country already had an international organization running here, Red Cross. The Covenant laid out the structure and rules for each of the bodies within the organization. However, the very democratic organization of the League was a great problem. The top most element of the League was the Assembly. This was the League's Parliament. Every country in the League sent a representative to the assembly. This only met once a year and it needed the agreement of ALL member countries before taking a decision. It represented all members, states regardless of size, and they all had a vote each. The assembly did not really have power at all and most decisions were compromises. The council was a smaller group and met more often, usually five times a year and on emergencies. It included the permanent and the temporary members. It was conquered by the permanent members. These were the major powers: Britain, France, Japan and Italy in the 1920s. The temporary ones were elected by the assembly for a three year period. The permanent countries had a Veto. This means that they could say no to a decision even if all the others agreed and that would block the decision. On a Dispute or a problem, the council had three options/steps. First step: Verbal Sanctions, a warning was given to the offender to leave the invaded territory or else. Second step was to impose Economic sanctions on the country. This meant that all the member countries had to completely stop trade with the offending Nation and push it towards bankruptcy. But how was this possible when all the member countries were busy rebuilding the nations? This was one of the reasons why the US did not join the League. Third step was to impose Physical Sanctions - Military force was to be used against the offender but the League did not have an army. The League army was its member's army but often the members were not willing to risk their armies and navies for other countries. The court of Justice had no power like the assembly. They would just make...

Find Another Essay On Was the league of nations a success or a failure?

Which was more important as a reason for the failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's? The absence of the USA or Britain and France's self interest

574 words - 2 pages The failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's was due to two main reasons.Firstly, the absence of the USA. The League of Nations was thought up by the American president Woodrow Wilson it was one of his 14 points. He had come up with the idea, the League was in a sense his child, yet he was allowed no part in it. The American congress had refused to become members of The League and this caused all sorts of problems. America had the biggest

How strong was the League of Nations?

616 words - 2 pages aspects.However there were many failure of League of Nations, too. For example, Corfu was a specific failure. This conflict was between Italy and Greece, and it was obvious that Italy should be blamed. But the League of Nations asked Greece to pay and apology to Italy, because Italy gave more money than Greece to the League. This shows that the League had not much power because they chose money instead of justice. So, League of Nations received bad reputation

Why was the League of Nations a failed organization by 1937? - History - Essay

1245 words - 5 pages powers in this organization would take independent action whenever it suited them. Failures in collective security such as the Ruhr crisis can be seen in two other main failures which were the Manchurian dispute and the Abyssinian Crisis. The Manchurian dispute was definitely a dreadful failure for the League of Nations. On a night in September 1931, Japanese soldiers made an attempt to blow off the railway in Mukden (in Manchuria) and lied, claiming

Assessment of the Success of the League of Nations

1185 words - 5 pages the league condemned all members for trading with Italy. Although Britain and France undermined this decision. Eventually the emperor of Abyssinia fled to Geneva where he addressed the council and protested against the failure of the league, this marked the end of the leagues existence. In conclusion was the league a success at all? The league did have successes and would have had many more but the member nations

Was reconstruction a success or failure for the nation as a whole and for Black Americans in particular?

591 words - 2 pages God's people are created equal. The national debate over reconstruction began during the civil war. Laws were put into place that gave African American rights but they failed drastically. The reconstruction was definitely a failure because of the Jim Crow laws.As the era of slavery, most black southerners remained in a cycle of poverty that allowed almost no escape. African Americans still lacked property, economic opportunity and political

How successful was the league of nations in the 1920's? This essay analyses the problems and difficulties of the first attempt of a world security organization

743 words - 3 pages How successful was the league in the 1920's?The League of Nations main aim was in: "stopping wars, improving people's lives and jobs, in encouraging disarmament and in enforcing the decisions made in the peace Treaty of Versailles."If we consider the above statement to judge the successes of the league, we may say that when the League was called to settle a quarrel in the 1920s, it has always been quite successful.The most important successes

The Failure of the League of Nations and the Outbreak of War in 1939

1401 words - 6 pages the British Navy. The French were angry with this, because Britain had pursued her own interests instead of backing the League of Nations or the Treaty of Versailles. Britain did this because there was sympathy on the issue of Germany's army. Hitler's actions were a cause that led to the outbreak of war. In 1933 he began rearming Germany and when the League did nothing, he took further steps. In 1936 he reintroduced

The Failure of the League of Nations to Keep Peace in the Nineteen-Thirties

2934 words - 12 pages The Failure of the League of Nations to Keep Peace in the Nineteen-Thirties After World War One in 1919 the allies created the League of Nations. It had a simple "raison d'etre", that was to prevent war. Its chief architect was President Woodrow Wilson of USA. However, upon its creation the United States did not join. Throughout its years the league faced many problems and struggled, however it managed to stay together

Failure of the League of Nations in the Inter-War Period

1201 words - 5 pages Japan is not a member, it is not something that they need to worry about. "Lord Lytton condemned Japanese aggression a month later," and the Japanese were able to take her prize, Manchukuo, safely with her. The League neglected this Manchurian Crisis, and came the start of the fall of the League of Nations. The next mistake was even more reckless. Italy invaded Abyssinia, and once again, the Collective Security had to act upon Italy. However

To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920's?

646 words - 3 pages Greek invaded Bulgaria as a reply to the murdering of Greek people. The League interfered and Greece became angry about their decision, reminding them of the incident between Italy and Greece in 1923, where Italy attacked them and Greece had to pay Italy for that and apologize. Those three incidents in the 1920's made the League a successful organization.An action which showed the success of the League of Nations was the establishment of

Why was the League of Nations unable to stop Japan taking over Manchuria in the 1930s?

1702 words - 7 pages The League of Nations was an international organisation formed in 1920 with its primary objective being to uphold world peace and promote collective security. This was based on the idea that if one of the League’s members was invaded, the other countries would stand up against the aggressor together. The League had a variety of successes, including settling the Aaland Islands dispute between Sweden and Finland, as well as failures, such as the

Similar Essays

The League Of Nations Was A Success

551 words - 2 pages The League of Nations managed to keep a lot of items going and introduced co-operation between countries in the 1920'sIn my opinion the League of Nations was a success I will discuss my reasons in this essay.The aims of the League of Nations were to discourage aggression, to encourage co-operation, disarmament and to improve working conditions for everyone in the world.The League of Nations was set up because after the First World War everyone

Was The League Of The Nations A Stupid Idea?

1545 words - 7 pages people, thus making the League of Nations an ultimate failure.It is a true fact that the League gained its social success in one way. Working conditions improved greatly through the International Labor Organization, people's health and diseases were taken more seriously. However, ultimately, we may state that the League was a failure due to the stupid ideas it had, such as establishing the organization without the help of America which also meant

Was Reconstruction A Success Or A Failure

1609 words - 7 pages exercising their new freedom and rights was through inflicting violence and distilling fear into them. The infamous Ku Klux Klan, or KKK. The Klan was established in 1866 in Tennessee. It was a racist group that organized riots and attacks in attempts to stop the advancement of colored people. They terrorized "carpetbaggers," "scalawags," blacks, and those who supported blacks. The American Pageant states, "The Klan became a refuge for

The League Of Nations A Success In The 20’s, A Failure In The 30’s. How Far Do You Agree With This Satement?

534 words - 2 pages , it ended with the Senate refusing to allow the USA join the League. This left the league with very little power over the world. But the failure of the League could also be blamed on the fact that they would not use violence to in force the peace which was needed in some situations.I partly agree that the League Of Nations was a success in the 20's and a failure in the 30's. I only partly agree, because although the League could be seen to have