Based on your view of the objectives of performance evaluation, evaluate the perspectives about performance appraisal presented by the managers.
Performance evaluations has many major functions, many embrace providing a basis for rewards and to evaluate previous training programs. I think the managers presented the flaws within the evaluation system. One in every of the flaws that were discerned within the case was the actual fact that emotions will creep into the evaluation process. If a manager has simply punished one in every of his or her workers that anger may cause a decent worker to receive a bad mark. The evaluation process will allow dishonesty to enter. Within the case a manager gave associate degree worker a bad mark even if her work wasn't up to par. Her reasoning was that the worker was browsing a troublesome time and this mark would facilitate pull her out. I don't believe that evaluations will effectively grade workers (Tanyaturner, 2013).
In your opinion, at what point does “fine-tuning” evaluations become unacceptable distortion?
Fine-tuning becomes an issue when someone is not accurately grading their team. He/she may have the plans to help somebody out but he/she end up hurting them by telling them their flaws. Despite the fact that he/she may accept the system is flawed he/she need to stay with the guidelines he/she were given. I am not a devotee of the system as it stands. I might advocate changing the system. However without concurred changes to the system, I don't think they might be made (Williergivens, 2011).
Assume you are the vice president of human resources at Eckel Industries and that you are aware that fine-tuning evaluations is a prevalent practice among Eckel managers. If you disagree with this perspective, what steps would you take to reduce the practice?
I agree because it can measure the performance of the employees.
Case study 13.1
What, in your opinion, did Baker hope to accomplish as a result of his conversation with Rennalls? Did he succeed? Why or why not?
Baker wanted to be able to get Rennalls to concede his disdain towards different races, particularly Europeans. I feel that his purpose was to get it out in the open so it could be discussed, and in this way dealt with before he took the employment of chief engineer, a part that might require even handed and genial treatment of subordinates from races other than his own. After the first reading of the article, I was under the feeling that Baker was between a rock and a hard place, because of the way that it was not only his own perception of Rennalls' attitude, which he may have had the ability to mislooking, however the perception by all Europeans working for the organization that Rennalls had a race awareness issue. The complaint of Martha Jackson, and a problem with Godson, another worker, helped to lean my evaluation in that way.
After read again the article, it gave the idea that most of Baker's evaluation of Rennalls' racial attitude were...