Essay On Rousseau

866 words - 3 pages

Jean-Jacques Rousseau talks about religion and State in his Social Contract. He first goes through histories of different nations, explaining the progression of religion in regards to the State. At first men never had any rulers other than their gods. Every political society was ruled by a different set of gods. These nations were often enemies of each other and would end up in wars. Wars would cause national divisions, and people would no longer know what people they were a part of. Throughout time, nations became so divided that by the time of the Roman Empire almost everyone simply became pagan, and the State was only ruled by man. However, things changed again when Jesus came, and started the biggest religious movement the world had ever seen. Jesus taught that everyone should obey God no matter what their human rulers say, and that Christianity should be spread throughout every nation in the world. Christianity was handled very differently by various States and, whether it was banned, forced, or perverted in someway, it has never really mixed very well with the State. Rousseau argues that the modern State must restrict Christianity. He does this mainly by presenting three types of religion and showing why they do not work well in society. The first type of religion that must be restricted is the "religion of man". The second type is the "religion of the citizen". The third type is the "religion of the priest."The "religion of man" is informal and unorganized, centered on morality and the worship of God. Rousseau then says that true Christianity of this sort would require every citizen to be an equally good Christian for peace and harmony to be maintained.1 He furthers this argument by adding that if one man were to become greedy he could dupe all the pious citizens for his benefit, since they would have to act towards him with infinite love. Rousseau also holds that this type of religion is bad for the State because all the citizens focus all their attention on heavenly things as opposed to the State.The "religion of the citizen" is described as the religion of a single country, or a national religion. A civil religion is organized with a hierarchy and formal dogmas. This religion would be exampled by societies like ancient Rome, where the religion teaches love for your country and obedience to the State. Rousseau actually praises this type of religion under the premise that if religion's sole purpose was to strengthen the state it would be a perfect fit. He argues, however, that this...

Find Another Essay On Essay on Rousseau

Jean Jacques Rousseau. Essay

2358 words - 9 pages Jean Jacques Rousseau was born in Geneva on June 18, 1712. He was raised by his father and then later by his aunt and uncle. This all happened not long after the death of his mother. Rousseau spent most of his life in France. He was a social and political philosopher that put together enlightenment and romantic themes in his writings. His main focus in many of his writings was the social inequalities within a society. Rousseau was thought of to

Rousseau Essay

726 words - 3 pages Rousseau In all of the “general will’s” different manifestations, it is what governs and preserves a society. One problem may be that people are simply unable to say what they really desire, or what they ought to desire, despite Rousseau’s distinctions between private and public will. Any group of people in its natural state, before the organization of society, will find itself caught up in disagreements between the general and the private will

Biography of Jean-Jacques Rousseau

2216 words - 9 pages with his essay on the arts and sciences and went on to write other famous works such as the Social Contract. Rousseau also made a text of his own life ‘his confessions and Rousseau judge of Jean-Jacques are apologies for what went wrong’ (McClelland, J.S 1996) Rousseau’s philosophical thinking was somewhat complicated he tried to grasp an emotional and passionate side of mankind. Rousseau’s political philosophy had

Mills and Rousseau on Contemporary Issues

1381 words - 6 pages ). Throughout Mills essay it is clear that he concentrates much of his time on liberty and well as individuality. If they are both present in a society there will be individual as well as social progress. Rousseau’s Discourse spent an abundance amount of time discussing inequality and how it came about in society. Rousseau’s writings described how he believed man first behaved. Rousseau believed that man was once a civil creature who was not in a

Rousseau and The Republican Party

1441 words - 6 pages Rousseau and The Republican Party     The Republican Party, since its first convention in Michigan in 1854, has had a philosophy that has remained relatively unchanged. Its oath entices Americans to believe that "good government is based on the individual and that each person's ability, dignity, freedom and responsibility must be honored and recognized"   In this essay, I will examine the Republican's main philosophies and will

Rousseau on the Social Contract and the Equality of Man

954 words - 4 pages Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in his essay concerning the origins of the inequality of man, has a view of natural man and civil man that is markedly different than previous thinkers like Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Rousseau sees natural man as free, self-sufficient and compassionate while Hobbes and Locke see man as mostly self-interested. This understanding of natural man is integral to Rousseau's view of civil society.Hobbes states that the life of

Rousseau´s Solution to ¨The Fundamental Problem¨

1393 words - 6 pages relinquish their naturalistic freedom. In this state, and by giving up their natural rights, individuals communise their rights to a state or body politic. Rousseau thinks by entering this social contract, where individuals unite their power and freedom, they can then gain civic freedom which enables them to remain free as the were before. In this essay, I will endeavour to provide arguments and examples to conclude if Rousseau provides a viable solution

Rousseau and the chains of society

849 words - 3 pages All men are born equal, but even before taking his first step or uttering his first word, a baby understands that it is every man for himself. Human nature may be born good--pure, simple, and as innocent as the baby himself--but when left to survive in this world, societal influences will ultimately shape and twist it into something else entirely. Rousseau understood this progression of human nature, and society's corruption of it. As he

Social contract in the view of Rousseau and Locke

1416 words - 6 pages English political theorist, John Locke focuses primarily on the framework of justifiable and workable government, all other issues and ideas as they relate to humanity can be explained and elaborated upon in that relationship. Locke also establishes the issues and viability relating to virtue. Almost the entire key members of the intellectual activity of the eighteenth century in England leads back to Locke. Locke was able to concisely describe

Compare the conception of freedom by any two of the following: Rousseau, Marx and Mills.

2760 words - 11 pages beliefs that determine freedom. Over the years political philosophers have explored this notion setting out their own conceptions of freedom in books. This essay will look at two particular writers: Jean Jacques Rousseau and John Stuart Mill. Their ideas and notion of freedom will be explored and compared in this essay.John Stuart Mill was one of the great Utilitarian philosophers of the nineteenth century. His work made much contribution to this

Rousseau and Kant on Law

1007 words - 4 pages sovereign.According to Rousseau, the common good of all people that are entering into a social contract is the general will. The general will is always correct. The term "general will" may sound ambiguous, but its definition sets it apart from other types. For instance, the general will is far different from the "will of all." The will of all is the sum of what everyone wants in the assembly, both of general and private interest. On the other hand

Similar Essays

This Is A Essay On He Enlightment Thinkers. Focusing On Locke And Rousseau. This Was My Term Paper For My History Of Civilizations Class.

1527 words - 6 pages the state. To him this idea was absurd. If an individual went against the general will he would be compelled to do so by the whole body. In other words, you're forced to agree with everyone; you're not allowed to contradict the general will. To Rousseau general will was everything. He based his whole political theory on it.Locke believed people were generally good and humane. Therefore he endorsed a constitutional government that mirrored the

Rousseau On Slavery, Essay

3651 words - 15 pages Jean Jacques Rousseau led a turbulent life. His mother died at his birth and his father deserted him shortly thereafter. Running from one set of friends to another as a young man he did settle long enough to do some serious writing from time to time. The Social Contract is considered one of his best works. This essay describes the relationship of man with society. Contrary to his earlier work, Rousseau claimed that the state of nature is

Jean Jacques Rousseau Philosopher Essay

914 words - 4 pages Jean-Jacques RousseauPhilosopher1712 - 1778Never exceed your rights, andthey will soon become unlimited.--Rousseau--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jean-Jacques Rousseau was born on June 28, 1712 in Geneva, Switzerland. His mother died shortly after his birth. When Rousseau was 10 his father fled from Geneva to avoid imprisonment for a minor offense, leaving young Jean-Jacques to be raised by an aunt

Rousseau And Machiavelli Essay

1203 words - 5 pages Essay No 1 Machiavelli and Rousseau, both influential philosophers, were innovators of their time. They represented different ideas on what the state of nature and government should consist of, having both similarities and differences. Their viewpoints evolved from different time periods, which make them unique. Machiavelli, the sixteenth century Italian diplomat expressed, that a Prince should be unethical in achieving power. He argued