This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Ethics And Politics: Compare Two Machiavellian Thinkers (Machiavelli And Han Fei Tzu)

1286 words - 5 pages

At first glance, Machiavelli and Han Fei Tzu may seem extremely alike in their attitudes towards ethics and politics. Although both philosophers lived in a different period of time and part of the world, their similarity in thoughts categorized them under the same title as "Machiavellian thinkers".However, with a closer examination of their writings, it is not unreasonable to notice that they are, to a certain extent, different in both their thoughts and interests.Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) was an Italian humanist who lived under the rule of the Medici family. His publication of the "The Prince" was a dedication to the Medicis in attempt to regain his post as secretary of war after being exiled. He rejoined humanist circles in failure of this attempt.Han Fei Tzu (c.280 B.C.-233 B.C.) was a Chinese philosopher who wrote political advice for the emperor. His publication of "On Having Standards" was a similar guide to Machiavelli's, of his ideas on the ideal methods to rule a state.Both Machiavelli and Han Fei built their methods of ruling upon their interpretations of human nature, which they perceived to be evil. Machiavelli states quite bluntly that in general, men "are ungrateful, voluble, dissemblers, anxious to avoid danger, and covetous of gain."p90 (The Prince). Han Fei, echoes his view with a corresponding answer of "deception, lies and falsehoods"p22 (On Having Standards). It was then upon this rule, that they stressed on the necessity in the exercise of law and politics to maintain a civil country. They studied common traits in the history of politics, to seek advice and confidence in which attitudes and methods of ruling to adopt. Their ideas meet on the unanimous aim to control.Machiavelli and Han Fei both acknowledged the basic qualities of a successful ruler to be unselfish, as one "who can block selfish pursuits and enforce the public law will see his armies growing stronger and his enemies weakening."p22 (On Having Standards) One must put the priority of a nation before his personal interests and continuously seek ways to improve his state. Up to this point, their perception of the political environment and basic elements of an ideal ruler seem to agree with each other. However, their intentions concerning politics appear to differ, this led to their different means and ends in political affairs.Machiavelli's interpretation of security was the elimination of fear, "one internal as regarding his subjects, one external as regards foreign powers."p95 (The Prince) This could only be achieved with the support of both "good laws and good arms"; thus it requires much more than honor to enforce such securities.Han Fei's source of security was power, and nothing but complete control would satisfy him. He believed that laws must be drawn up by the ruler, and that no private judgement should exist. Harsh laws should be applied ruthlessly. Warfare was one main subject in his mind.These, were...

Find Another Essay On ETHICS AND POLITICS: COMPARE TWO MACHIAVELLIAN THINKERS (Machiavelli And Han Fei Tzu)

Hsün Tzu and Jean-Paul Sartre Comparison of two Philosophers

1963 words - 8 pages Fraud, murder, courage, and strong will are all words that can be linked to humanity. These words will often raise questions like, who did it, how they did it, or why. Can it be that the true answer to these questions lies in getting a better understanding of our human nature? Does man act according to his divine plan, or is he taught how to act? In analyzing the works of Hsün Tzu and Jean-Paul Sartre, I will determine which of these two

Machiavellian and Proud Essay

734 words - 3 pages Those who are known to use cunning and deceiving tricks to get ahead are often called Machiavellian. Yet, they can also be described as realistic and practical. Unlike Plato, Niccolo Machiavelli sees mankind as it truly is. Machiavelli knows what humans really want and he sees us for what we really are. Whether that be selfish, conceiving, ungenerous, or immoral, it is true. He shows us how to use all our qualities to better ourselves, and how

Do The Ends Justify The Means? A Comparison Of The Writings Of Niccolo Machiavelli And Lao Tzu

1252 words - 5 pages "Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown." An apt quote from William Shakespeare's King Henry IV, Part II, on the trials and tribulations of those in power. Numerous writers have had their say on the subject, more often than not with vastly different ideas on how leaders should act. In this paper I compare and contrast the opinions of two different philosophers, Lao-Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli, as to the principles by which a leader should

Aquinas in "Politics and Ethics"

671 words - 3 pages in spite of the lofty ideas and ideals set forth by the Church which has supplied these as reason for Christians to use as an avenue for redemption and salvation for the past two thousand years, giving the common man a reason for faith in God."To know what reason can investigate concerning God requires that one already have a knowledge of many things, since almost all of philosophy is directed towards the knowledge of God." (Ch. 4, p. 4) St

Han and Roman Empires

2680 words - 11 pages From the 2nd century BCE through the 1st century CE, both the Han and Roman empires were dealing with the production of advancement in technology. Since the empires were from separate time periods each empire had different attributes when it came to creating technology and what they built with their technology. In the Han Empire, technology had been a luxury part of their empire because it was essential to their wealth and productivity. In the

Compare and contrast two approaches

1404 words - 6 pages Psychology is a huge science area with many variations on approach. Over many years Psychologists such as Freud, Skinner, Rogers and Watson, just to name a few, have contributed, providing us with invaluable tools to evaluate and treat mental illness, understand and treat phobias and indeed provide us with a window into the unconscious mind.In particular, two areas of study have intrigued me, so I believe it would be useful to compare and

compare and contrast two countries

2643 words - 11 pages Population Policy Essay in GeographyComparison of two Population PoliciesIntroductionPopulation policy determines the principles, objectives and policies adopted by the State as regards population issues for the purpose of influencing the population status, including variables in population growth and its main elements (fertility, births, deaths, geographical distribution, immigration, population composition such as population youthfulness or

Niccolò Machiavelli and Desiderius Erasmus: Two Styles of Humanism

534 words - 2 pages politics seems to be impossible at that time, even at the present.On the other hand, Machiavelli theory does not concern about morality and is cruel. The prince, a favorite Machiavelli's illustration, demonstrated clearly his point of view:" The prince must be as sly as the fox and as brutal as the lion." and " cruelty or hypocrisy is permissible; judicious cruelty consolidates power and discourages revolution."(302). These two typically statements

Compare Mill and Kant’s Ethics

917 words - 4 pages Kant’s Ethics may best apply to modern business. Kant said right action based on a set of moral rules, and the right action is supposed to be the one that conforms with these rules, whereas certain other types of action are morally forbidden. He also suggests that people should be treated "with respect and as ends in their own right, not solely as means to other's ends." On the contrary, Mill’s ethics only concern about the happiness of majority

Morals and Ethics in The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

1501 words - 7 pages In The Prince, Machiavelli discusses morality and ethics concerning secular powers, specifically principalities and secular government. On the other hand, Erasmus discusses the role of morality and personal ethics with regards to religious institutions, specifically the church. While both address different institutions, both express similar viewpoints on many issues. Both agree that personal ethics and morals run thin in the institutions

Chronological Issues And Their Philosophical Solutions A comparison of 3 European Thinkers and their writtings: John Locke, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels, and Niccolo Machiavelli

1059 words - 4 pages Chronological Issues And Their Philosophical SolutionsThroughout history, there have been many philosophers who have looked at their environments, all seeking the remedies to the social, economic, and political problems faced by its people. Among them are Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, and Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels. Each of the authors' ideas and writings are influenced by, and reflect, the problems that they faced during their time. This

Similar Essays

The Machiavellian Relationship Between Religion And Politics

1209 words - 5 pages the Roman Catholics to become corrupt instead of pious and ethical as the Church cannot stay religious when it becomes intertwined with politics. Without the rule of one republic or prince, as in France and Spain, the Church would be dividing Italy and that States cannot stay happy and united. Machiavelli states that is why Italy isn't as successful as these two countries because the country is divided and the reason for the division is the

Machiavelli Vs. Thoreau (Compare And Contrast Essay)

1040 words - 4 pages The way one should govern and the way for one to be governed will always be an ongoing struggle. How can a government maintain order and the safety of its people yet at the same time preserve its citizens' natural right to be free? The ideas from Niccolo Machiavelli, an Italian aristocrat, who published "The Prince" in 1513 for a Medici prince as a guideline on how to rule a country, gives a conservative approach to how one should govern. Henry

Machiavelli, Jefferson, And Lao Tzu. Relating Their Works To Modern Times And Their Attitudes Of People

1185 words - 5 pages despotism to the modern day "democracy", each differing from minute ways to having great differences in doctrine, but all with the purpose of seeking the system that is best for the people whom are under it. Three authors, three "great thinkers", Jefferson, Machiavelli, and Lao Tzu, each have outlined their basic beliefs and plans for the perfect government through their different works. While the works of each of the authors were created hundreds of

The Tao Te Ching By Lao Tzu And The Prince By Machiavelli

1751 words - 7 pages to maintain power, at any cost. Since these thinkers both make an inquiry to what is essentially the same dilemma of effective leadership, it becomes almost a natural progression to juxtapose the two in an effort to better understand what qualities a prosperous leader must possess. In this sense, when we utilize the rhetorical strategy of compare/contrast as a vehicle to transport us to a more enlightened interpretation of Lao-Tzu and