This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Ethics Blurred In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

684 words - 3 pages

In “The Most Dangerous Game” the author creates two strikingly similar characters that blur the line of ethics. Rainsford, the protagonist, meets his adversary and leader of an exotic tribe, Zaroff, after falling off of a yacht and swimming to the nearest island. The short story then explores the events that transpires between the strangers – focusing on Zaroff's bloodthirsty hunt against Rainsford. Yet even with the two men on opposite sides of a loaded gun, they both share many common interests and views pertaining to their similar backgrounds, hunting methods, and desired end result.
With Rainsford meeting Zaroff on an exotic location, it is apparent that their experiences have taken them all over the globe and put them into a variety of diverse, yet similar, situations. Upon their first encounter, Rainsford's book on hunting snow leopards is mentioned and the reader can imply that he has hunted in arctic areas that a normal hunter would not dare to go. However, the ...view middle of the document...

From Rainsford's pit filled with spiky sticks to his catapulted knife, he uses an array of lethal techniques to kill his opposition, but Zaroff, too, knows those tactics. Instead of rushing at Rainsford blindly, Zaroff sends dogs and servants to check for traps. After avoiding each death trap. Zaroff calls Rainsford out on the failed attempts. It can be inferred that both men were familiar with the specifications of a multitude of contraptions and used them quite a bit over their hunting careers. Neither man can gain an advantage on the other because their methods on tracking and trapping prey are so similar. Any time one tried to out-smart or out-cheat the other, they intended victim always found to a way to predict his opponent's move and escape – almost like they shared a brain.
What should have been a game of cat-and-mouse, like Zaroff was accustomed to, Rainsford put up a fight. The “prey” went on the offensive, and so the simple hunt became a death-match between rivals.
Despite their disagreement in morals, both men knew the only justifiable resolution would be murder. Zaroff, like a drug addict, is searching for a thrill that parallels the high he got from his first kill. He believes that because he has shown dominance over everything worthy to hunt that real people are his only challenge left, and therefore he attacks Rainsford. On the contrary, Rainsford initially believes that no sane person should kill another human being, but after getting attacked by Zaroff his survival instincts kick in. To justify his actions, Rainsford convinces himself that killing Zaroff would be self defense – yet he goes out of his way to end his attacker's life. Not only did the story end with both men as murderers, but one can guess that Rainsford, after tasting the excitement of killing another person, will usurp Zaroff's role as “General of the Island” and in turn become the monster he fled from. In the end, it can be hypothesized that the two characters' beliefs overlap.
With the conclusion finishing so abruptly, it works as an allusion to show just how similar Rainsford and Zaroff are. So even if the characters had different means to justify the end result, they both shared a similar history, practiced their equal hunting abilities, and learned to sympathize with one another.

Find Another Essay On Ethics Blurred in The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell

"The Most Dangerous Game" By Richard Connell "A Portrait Of A Most Dangerous Man"

790 words - 3 pages "The Most Dangerous Game"By Richard Connell"A Portrait Of A Most Dangerous Man"General Zaroff is one of the main characters in Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game". General Zaroff has military training as he mentions that he is a commander of a division of the Cossack Calvary during the Russian Revolution. After the Russian Revolution, General Zaroff, an avid hunter and aristocrat moves to his island (referred to as Ship-Trap

Comparing The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson and The Most Dangerous Game, by Richard Connell

1500 words - 6 pages The purpose of this paper will be the comparing and contrasting of two short stories previously read and interpreted by the writer. The two stories chosen were “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, and “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell. These two stories seem to have nothing in common, as they have two separate meanings in two separate eras. However, the moral of each story draws similarity, the author’s paints a picture to keep the

Alternate Ending An assessment of a possible ending to ‘The most Dangerous game’ by Richard Connell

994 words - 4 pages Zanoff, although it never did, Zanoff stayed as forced and clever as ever. Zanoff let Rainsford draw closer, luring him in by missing him by inches, laying bullets into Rainsford, and taking most of the bullets fired at him. Zanoff was going to die, and he knew it, however, his prey would die first. Finally, Rainsford was upon Zanoff, leaping with teeth bared and flames alive in his scorching eyes. Zanoff didn’t move allowing himself to be

Comparison between the text, The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell and the poem, Porphyria's Lover by Robert Browning

2437 words - 10 pages beneath my burning kiss", shows the effect of how strong and pure love made the corpse cheek turn red. It also should be noted that this entire poem is in first person and since the narrator is also deemed as a lunatic, the events that have occurred may or may not be true.The short story of "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Edward Connell, is about a celebrated hunter from New York City called Sanger Rainsford and also the Cossack General Zaroff

The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connel

872 words - 3 pages “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, is a skilled hunter who believes that animals were made to be hunted; he has no sympathy for them. Stranded on island with a killer chasing him, he learns to make rational choices. While both Harrison and Ranisford are courageous characters, Rainsford’s prudence enables him to overpower his enemy, whereas Harrison’s impulsive nature results in him being shot dead. Commanded by an unjust

Comparison and Contrast of "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell with the 1930s movie version -short

585 words - 2 pages changed or eliminated. "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell is no exception.In the result of the transition of "The Most Dangerous Game" from literature to film, many aspects were altered. Though some are superficial, such as the appearance of "General Zaroff" and the movie's Count Zaroff, or the physical conditions of Ivan, others are quite noticeable. For example, concerning the introduction, the exchange between the short story's

The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Cornell

1247 words - 5 pages “The Most Dangerous Game”, by Richard Cornell was a story which Mr.Cornell used 8 aspects of fiction to show his point of view that one who has intellect can overcome one who has intelligence or instinct. The character’s used in the story gave the author a way to make his point of view come clear to his audience. The story uses sequence of events. The plot is how the story goes about. The setting is the surroundings of the story, or where it

Desire for Competition in Coriolanus by Shakespeare and The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connells

1144 words - 5 pages one is to do justice to Shakespeare and Richard Connells’ intentions. This paper will provide a thorough overview through a stage of self-interests that led to murderous crimes, that of which is shown through competition, jealousy, and vengeance. Both Coriolanus and The Most Dangerous Game involve characters that have a prevailing desire for competition. This competition conveys conflict, which in turn contributes to the confrontation and the

Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

1978 words - 8 pages moment, but as he became more desperate as the "game" continued, he gathered his wits about him more and became more and more like Zaroff, as it became a contest as to who would survive, a contest Rainsford did not intend to lose. The antagonist of the story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, is General Zaroff. The General would be classified as a flat character. All he ever talks about is being a hunter. In the story he says

Elements of Literature in Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game"

670 words - 3 pages hunted by General Zaroff. Suspense, setting, and irony make Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" an electrifying short story.Suspense is a major element in this story. Without it, the reader will get bored. After Rainsford finds out that Zaroff has "invented" a new game, all the readers get curious of what that new hunt is. When Zaroff reveals his sick way of hunting humans, shock fills Rainsford. Later in the story, Zaroff forces Rainsford to

The Most Dangerous Game

2329 words - 9 pages the O. Henry Memorial Award for short fiction in 1923 and 1924, which is proof that this story is worthy of reading. "The Most Dangerous Game" is analyzed as an exciting journey and a must-read short story for young adults everywhere. To begin with, the setting for “The Most Dangerous Game” is very fitting. The author, Richard Connell, picked the best place to set the story. Reason being, the mansion is on a large island that is feared by

Similar Essays

"The Most Dangerous Game," By Richard Connell

566 words - 2 pages Implausible EscapeThe short story "The Most Dangerous Game," by Richard Connell, is a piece of escape fiction wherein implausible factors run throughout. Escape fiction, however, depends on this element because it could not otherwise escape reality without being a touch unrealistic. Connell places implausibility into his story in a variety of ways. Manipulation of the characters, environment, and odds create unlikely instances for each, from

Analytic Essay Of The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

734 words - 3 pages A story full of action, suspense, well developed characters, and a titanic struggle of good vs. evil is "The Most Dangerous Game." In this story the author, Richard Connell, shows the reader his traits of his characters and how they do what they do with the plot. The main character, Rainsford, tests his wits against Zaroff, the antagonist of the story. The author also cleverly puts in ironic twists in the story to enhance his elements. The

Literary Analysis Of The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

660 words - 3 pages Richard Connells “The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story which illustrates that calm analytical thinking can increase your odds of survival and controlling panic. We are introduced to the protagonist and main character, Sanger Rainsford who is a big game hunter and a WW1 veteran. The story starts off with a conversation between Whitney and Rainsford discussing the island, so we can understand the reputation it holds. Whitney is a fellow

Reason Versus Instinct In “The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

654 words - 3 pages In “The Most Dangerous Game,” Richard Connell correlates three common literary devices especially well: setting, suspense, and plot. Connell makes use of an appropriate setting, the literary element of suspense, and an interesting plot in order to strengthen the story’s recurring theme of reason versus instinct within humans, and to blur that line between reason and instinct. In order to emphasize his recurring theme of reason versus instinct