This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Not Permiting Euthanasia The Mercy Killing

1656 words - 7 pages

Euthanasia is an issue that has been in the center of many heated debates for several years. It is prohibited in all fifty states of the United States under homicide laws and in England with a fourteen year imprisonment, but it is legal in Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands (“Euthanasia and Physician”). Euthanasia comes from the ancient Greek word euthanatos, which means easy death. Today, the definition of euthanasia is the direct killing of a person with a disabi¬lity or terminal illness to relieve them of their sufferings. Very often people will call euthanasia mercy killing mainly because the method is to put a person out of their pain (“Euthanasia”). Euthanasia can be done by either taking actions or not providing what is necessary to keep a person alive and is either carried out through recommendations, a person’s request, family or society burdens, or the scarcity of medical resources (“Euthanasia and Physician”). Because a precious human life is not a burden, we should not interfere with God’s business in life and death, and since the practice of euthanasia can lead to abuse, euthanasia should not be allowed.
God created humans on earth with reasons and purposes in mind; therefore they are not to be seen as burdens. Instead, humans should be viewed as important beings with precious lives because God gave us the privilege to life as a gift of His love. We are to preserve and make it fruitful since it is the fundamental base of all goods. Life is also the crucial source and condition of human activity and society, so without human life the world would be completely unbalanced (John Paul II). This means that all humans are to be valued despite their age, sex, race, religion, social status, or potential in the world because each one of us are irreplaceable, made in God’s image, and possess a dignity (“Euthanasia and Physician,” John Paul II).
We should not interfere with God’s business in life and death. God is the only one to decide when a person dies, considering He is our creator. Births and deaths are a part of God’s plan for us, so to kill ourselves is to deny those rights God has over our lives and deaths. No humans should have the authority to take the life of themselves or anyone else, even if it is desired by relatives, friends, medical employees, or themselves. Doing so interrupts the arrangement God has established for us on Earth as humans (“Euthanasia and Physician”).
The practice of euthanasia can lead to abuse. Euthanasia sends out the message it is better for a person to be dead rather than sick or disabled. Not only does that devalue a person’s status as a human but puts them at risk. Because euthanasia is mercy killing, or the deliberate ending of a person who has a condition that cannot be healed, someone can kill a person who does not want to die and use euthanasia as a cover for their crime. Simply saying, euthanasia can be abused and used as murder (“Euthanasia and Physician”).
Although, one...

Find Another Essay On Not Permiting Euthanasia the Mercy Killing

Why Euthanasia is not the Solution

1338 words - 6 pages Assisted Suicide law since 1998” (Henness 3). Moreover, it is very necessary to prohibit mercy killing because it violates human rights and contradicts religions and destroys the patient-doctor relationship. First, regarding human rights it may be thought that euthanasia or mercy killing is compatible with human rights because of the term “mercy”. However, all the human rights conventions and treaties came to ensure human dignity which does not

Euthanasia: Not Just for the Terminally Ill

1436 words - 6 pages Euthanasia: Not Just for the Terminally Ill      Euthanasia or assisted suicide would not only be available to people who are terminally ill. This popular misconception is what this essay seeks to correct. There is considerable confusion on this point, perhaps further complicated by statements in the media.   There are two problems here - the definition of "terminal" and the changes that have already taken place to extend

The Right to Die - An ethical argument for the civil right of one to die either by suicide or physician assisted mercy killing

2335 words - 9 pages others including oneself as ends rather than means, euthanasia would violate the categorical imperative, in that the person is treated as a means by killing himself, to reach the end goal of eliminating the pain. Therefore, since euthanasia does not meet the moral standards set out by Kantianism, it would not support the act of euthanasia as a morally sound action.SynthesisHowever, neither Utilitarianism, nor Kantianism provides an adequate

Active Euthanasia: Benefiting The Patient is not The Worse Act

1604 words - 6 pages active euthanasia, the doctor is directly responsible despite the consent given by the patient themselves. American ethics and animal right philosopher, James Rachels (1975) challenges the division of these two conceptions commenting that although he acknowledges that both can be defined as immoral, there is certainly no approval to label one as morally above another. In most incidences killing is morally worse and crueller than letting die

To Die or Not to Die, Euthanasia in the U.S

1666 words - 7 pages Imbody (1997) also stated, "And then we mock their memories by dismissing their deaths with the disdainful oxy-moron of mercy killing. We say killing a human being is murder but killing them is something less" (National Right to Life Committee). Euthanasia can be viewed in many different angles, there are thousands of cases in which the "right to die" has been an issue. A competent human being is capable of deciding whether or not to live, but

Euthanasia: A controversial issue paper dealing with whether or not people have the right to choose to die. This paper is in support of euthanasia/assisted suicide

1257 words - 5 pages may lead to death." (Court decision, 1) Anothercase in which euthanasia was supported was a case involving Oregon's Deathwith Dignity Act. "A federal judge upheld Oregon's law allowing physicianassisted suicide, ruling that the Justice Department does not have theright to overturn it." (Oregon, 1) "The judge ordered the federalgovernment to halt any efforts to prosecute Oregon physicians, pharmacistsand other health-care providers who participate

The Death Penalty: Killing Taxpayer’s Wallets...Not Criminals

1849 words - 7 pages public does not have health insurance, much less dental, so how do these death row inmates get to enjoy all these services? How is this program funded? While the cost of the health services for inmates is not listed on the site, the website did state what death row inmates are allowed to do. Death row inmates can get a job (it is fairly low wage), watch television in their day room from 7 am until 11 pm, exercise (an hour daily), or just lay around

The Euthanasia Debate

1193 words - 5 pages dying” (Dr. Ira Byock.) The purpose of this paper is not to support either side, rather this paper will discuss what euthanasia really is, the past of euthanasia, and both the positive and negative sides of euthanasia. Euthanasia and its history According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Euthanasia “is the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering.” Euthanasia has an intention of

Religious Leaders Should Support Euthanasia

1144 words - 5 pages Euthanasia has been a medical ethic issue for many years, and many factors make up the cause of this issue, including religion. Euthanasia is the painless way of ending one’s life, also known as “mercy-killing”, or “good death” when translated from the Greek language. There are many types of euthanasias: passive, active, voluntary, and involuntary euthanasia. There can be many different points of views on each different type of euthanasia

Physician-Assisted Suicide

1548 words - 6 pages death” (Nargus). “Euthanasia” refers to the ending of a life. It is also known as “mercy killing” (Nargus). The ancients Greeks were generally tolerant of suicide, however great philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle argued against assisted suicide (Uhlmann 25-32). This most likely influenced many Western countries to refrain from legalizing and practicing euthanasia until the 1900s. A “euthanasia” program in Nazi Germany killed 200,000

The Debate On Euthanasia (Oral)

1023 words - 4 pages doctor's because they know of their patient's intentions. Euthanasia does not only apply to humans it can also extend to domestic animals such as cats or dogs. It can apply when the animal is hopelessly sick and it is killed as a relatively painless way of death. Euthanasia is only permitted for domestic animals with the intention of granting the animal mercy from their hopelessly sick situation.In 1995 the Northern Territory became the country's

Similar Essays

Euthanasia, Mercy Killing Essay

1094 words - 4 pages Euthanasia is defined as 'a painlesskilling,espacially to end a painful andincurable disease;mercy killing'. Therighteousness of this act is being debatedin several countries throughout theworld,and Canada is no exception.Euthanasisamust not be accepted for religious,legal andmedical reasons,as alternatives to such adramatic end.To begin,the law,both civil andreligious,forbid killing. Individuals areprosecuted in courts of law for

Euthanasia Essay: Mercy Killing Or Murder?

1366 words - 5 pages has been the alleviation of pain and suffering.  One point at which these two views collide is over the hotly debated issue of euthanasia.        Euthanasia, or "mercy killing," as it has been called, is certainly not an issue with just two sides.  There are many shades of gray involved, so to speak.  Euthanasia, after all,  ranges from simply allowing an individual to die naturally without life support or "pulling the plug" (passive

Assisted Suicide And Euthanasia It Is Not Murder, It Is Mercy

1677 words - 7 pages Euthanasia: It Is Not Murder, It Is Mercy Thesis Statement: Thousands of people in the United States alone die every year from terminal illness such as cancer, ALS and AIDS. Advanced Medical technology is responsible for keeping many of them alive - many against their wishes. In the United States, euthanasia (assisted suicide) is illegal in all but one state. Many patients are forced to suffer needlessly when there is another alternative

Euthanasia: Mercy Or Murder? The Adequacy Of Australian And International Law

1661 words - 7 pages drug hastens the death of the patient, the doctor is deemed not guilty of murder. Although euthanasia and assisted suicide is illegal, law makers in Australia have made some attempts to change these laws, to the more relevant ones society needs.On 25 May 1995, the 'rights of the terminally ill' bill allowing medical practitioners to perform voluntary euthanasia or assist in suicide of terminally ill patients was passed through the Northern