This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

How Is The Independence Of The Judiciary Guaranteed In Australia?

880 words - 4 pages

a) How is the independence of the judiciary guaranteed in Australia?While the Westminster system had largely developed because of the doctrine of separation of powers, the Australian system of government is largely based on the Westminster. This doctrine of separation of powers proposes that the three institutions of government, the legislature, the executive and the judiciary should be exercised as separate and independent branches. It is this doctrine that stresses the need for the independence of the judiciary from the other two government institutions in order to protect the freedom of individuals. It is under this doctrine that no person can be a Member of Parliament and a judge at the same time. The doctrine of separation of powers offers several advantages, it proposes separate, specialized and efficient branches of government and it also reduces the abuse of government power by dividing it.a) Why is the independence of the judiciary an important feature of Australia's system of justice?The judiciary is the government branch that is concerned with the administration of justice. The judiciary is absolutely separate from the executive and the legislature, so it can check the concentration of government power. The independence of the judiciary is crucial of a democratic community because when judges are presiding over cases, there must be no interference and intimidation from the external forces. The independence issues touches upon the conflict of authority and freedom. If the doctrine of separation of powers did not exist, the authority would not be prevented from interfering in the administration of justice, therefore the basic freedoms of the citizens would not be guaranteed. It is up to the judiciary to exercise according to the law. It would be without the independence of the judiciary that the principles of rule of law and natural justice would be jeopardy and other institutions of government would interfere in the administration of justice.There are three main elements of the independence of the judiciary they are, permanency of tenure, dismissal by parliament and fixed remuneration. Permanency of tenure means that judges are appointed by the executive government and have a permanent tenure until they have to retire at the age of seventy. It was a constitutional referendum in 1977 that placed this requirement on federal judges. Also state laws have been made, for the state judges to retire at the same age. The only exception is the Family court justices; they have to retire at the age of sixty-five.Judges can only be dismissed on the grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity and can only be dismissed by parliament representatives. This is a...

Find Another Essay On How is the independence of the judiciary guaranteed in Australia?

The Power Of The Judiciary Essay

1514 words - 6 pages an option, and interpretation was the only means of deliberation. For these reasons, it is clear to see that the Judiciary branch has established itself as a clear cut policy making institution, but how does it fair in decisions involving the Executive or Legislative branches of the government. An examination of the cases in which the Court has held federal legislation unconstitutional provide an excellent answer to that question. &nbsp

The Power of the Judiciary Essay

1653 words - 7 pages Court to interpret the law as best described by the Constitution would be useless because the Constitution states nothing on the matter of abortion. So what is the Supreme Court supposed to do in these types of situations? The answer of course is to take the matter into their own hands and interpret the law as THEY see fit. It is the only way handle a situation that the Constitution does not address. This is exactly how the Judiciary becomes a

The Judiciary in Ireland: Interpreter of the Constitution

1560 words - 6 pages The Judiciary’s foremost role is to defend and uphold the constitution and to assure rule of law prevails in a country. In some ways it is the watchdog for the rights and liberties of the citizens. The Judiciary acts as a guardian of the constitution, arbitrates between the people and the legislature. Having said that has the Judiciary become puissant? Should we cap the amount of power it posses at present? I will discuss the question at hand

Is the Judiciary Branch a despotic branch?

953 words - 4 pages set an important precedent. It gave the Supreme Court the power to decide whether laws passed by congress were constitutional and to reject laws that it considered to be unconstitutional known as the judicial review. This raised Jefferson's concern that the court and Judiciary branch have too much power, making it a despotic branch."The a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any

Independence Is the Key

803 words - 4 pages their home, take them to places, and overall, take care of them. However, this means that it takes a lot of time for children to develop independence, and being surrounded by people who can always help you and assist you does not make the situation any better. Dictators have the desire to separate young children from their families because children begin to learn how to do everything on their own, and they become self-sufficient individuals. In

The Judiciary and Republicanism

1939 words - 8 pages Hamilton confirms, in federalist 78, that it is the «duty [of the Supreme Court] to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the constitution void» (238). Therefore, one can affirm that judicial review is not unconstitutional and was, in fact, the product of the will of the people. At this point one can question the consequence of judiciary review on popular sovereignty. By establishing judicial review, did the people forfeit their

How Does English Law Give Effect to the Right to Marry and Found a Family as Guaranteed by Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights?

1816 words - 7 pages 'appreciation' to decide how it understands marriage. Therefore, if taken literally, this article seems to give English law the power to determine and limit marriage. However, the decisions made by English courts have been challenged on many occasions, successfully and unsuccessfully. The scope of this qualification is unclear. It is evident that the exercise of the rights guaranteed cannot be wholly governed by English law. In that case the protection of

This essay is assesing the accusations made against King George III in the Declaration of Independence

958 words - 4 pages The Declaration of Independence, arguably the most important document in our history, was a statement of purpose. The declaration is divided into four sections, the first and most recognized is the preamble; in the preamble the colonies explain why it is necessary to issue a declaration. Second, it describes the inalienable rights of every man, which include: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The third section, which often times is

The Independence of Spainish Colonies in America

1150 words - 5 pages The Spanish empire in the Americas faced huge political, social and economic problems in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The empire was stretched to its limit politically and socially with the threat of an uprising from the slave population in its empire. The economy also played a major role and the outlook was just as bleak for Spain with the American colonies drifting towards independence. Spain did not seem able to cope with its

Rhetoric in the Decleration of Independence

690 words - 3 pages Rhetoric in the Decleration of Independence Independence, to many that word means freedom, a fresh start, a place of salvation, free from the tyranny of kings. The Declaration of Independence gives power to the idea that such a nation could form and be successful. This powerful piece of political prose and rhetoric has held strong to these beliefs for years. The introduction consists of a single long sentence that subtlety directs

The Causes of Indian Independence in 1947

831 words - 3 pages The Causes of Indian Independence in 1947 In 1947 India was declared an independent country from Britain, after years of peaceful and violent protests, pressure from all sides, and numerous promises. Not only this, but Pakistan was also formed by partitioning the country into two, providing a separate homeland for the Muslims of India. Although independence was greeting with relief from all, partition came with riots

Similar Essays

Essay About The Importance Of The Independence Of The Judiciary In Australia

1830 words - 7 pages Foundations Essay - Independence of the JudiciaryTo understand the expression 'the independence of the judiciary' you first must understand what is meant my judiciary. The judicature is:The judicial power of the commonwealth shall be vested in a Federal Supreme Court, to be called the High Court of Australia, and in such other federal courts as the Parliament creates, and in such other courts as it invests with federal jurisdiction. The High

Malaysia: Rule Of Law And Independence Of The Judiciary

6151 words - 25 pages order to secure its independence and impartiality.This paper aims to draw attention to the spirit of constitutionalism by giving focus to this one crucial aspect of the democratic system, that is the Rule of Law, and examine the issue of how the Rule of Law can be seen to have been undermined in Malaysian society. In this regard the independence of the Judiciary will be examined, drawing much attention to the Judicial crisis of 1988. The events

Women In The Judiciary Essay

2720 words - 11 pages Women in the Judiciary You can't be shining lights at the bar because you are too kind. You can never be corporation lawyers because you are not cold-blooded. You have not a high grade of intellect. You can never expect to get the fees men get. I doubt if you [can] ever make a living. Of course you can be divorce lawyers. That is a useful field. And there is another field you can have solely for your own. You can't make a living at it, but it's

Lack Of Diversity In The Judiciary

1345 words - 6 pages such as John Griffith have suggested that the narrow range of the judiciary threatens to undermine public confidence in the judicial system. Similarly, Baroness Hale argues that a representative judiciary is paramount for directives associated with the promotion of equal opportunities and strengthening of judicial legitimacy. The government has attempted to combat these issues with statutory and procedural changes to the Courts and Legal Service