How Successful Was Alexander Ii’s Edict On Emancipation Of The Serfs In Modernizing Russia In The Years 1861 1881?

3860 words - 15 pages

Alexander II was the Tsar Liberator who, despite unflattering characterization by his contemporaries, undertook one of the biggest reforms in Russian history: the liberation of the serfs. Yet despite such a necessary and seemingly humanitarian reform, his life was abruptly finished by a successful terrorist attack following no fewer than ten unsuccessful ones.
The main challenge Alexander II faced in his projects towards modernization of Russia was a compromise between advancing his state thorough improving the lives of his subjects, without falling prey to the demand for further reforms he would be unable to satisfy. Westwood, revisiting Russian History in 1981 phrased the problem as follows: “how to advance the education of the state by educating the people, without educating the people to questions the state? ”.
After the crippling defeat in the Crimean War, Alexander II knew that Russia could not be allowed to lag behind the Western world any longer if it was to maintain its independence. The reform of the state had been advisable for a long time, but for Alexander III it was necessary. He knew that before any real changes could be achieved, the main problem had to be solved: the problem of serfdom. However many limits and imperfections his edict of Emancipation carried with it, most importantly it allowed for further modernizing reforms in the legal, government, education and military spheres.  
The need to abolish serfdom was a persistent and, according to Mosse writing in 1958, biggest problem in Russian society since the reign of Peter the Great. All the problems of Russian Empire stemmed from serfdom and would automatically be solved with its removal .
To begin with, it was a natural step the development of Russian society since abolition of the obligation of the gentry towards the monarchy. When nobility did not have to serve the Tsar any more after Peter III’s reforms, the chain equation in which the serfs served nobility and nobility served the King had been broken. It was only natural for serfs to expect liberation from their feudal bonds as well . The expectation of the serfs to be granted freedom manifested itself in more frequent and violent demands. An overwhelming majority of the Russian population, the serfs were a force to be reckoned with. “Official Russia, westernized Russia, could ignore the real Russia; only when the peasantry flared into revolt was it noticed ”. The Pugachev rebellion of 1770s demonstrated very clearly that Russian monarchy could not keep ignoring demands for reform forever. Alexander alluded to the dangers of continuing serfdom when enlisting support from the gentry, drawing on recent instances of unrest: “It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to await the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below ”.
Alexander II’s loosening of censorship clearly demonstrated an overwhelming support of the public for the emancipation of the serfs. Both the young intellectuals of the day – Herzen,...

Find Another Essay On How successful was Alexander II’s Edict on Emancipation of the Serfs in modernizing Russia in the years 1861-1881?

Outline the problems facing the Tsarist regime during the reigns of Alexander III and Nicholas II. How successful were they in tackling these problems?

1311 words - 5 pages The tsarist regime had many internal problems during the reigns of Alexander III and Nicholas II. These include: economic repression, lacklustre political and social reforms and large cultural diversity. Alexander III and Nicholas II both had differing complications within the aforementioned problems and thus it becomes possible not only to outline but to conclude how successful they were in attempting to deal with them.The economy of Russia

Why were the Bolsheviks successful in Russia, October 1917?

827 words - 3 pages Lenin who emphasized the need to act soon while there was still momentum, and circumstances which increased the people's discontent for the provisional government, and therefore put them on the side of the Bolsheviks.In February 1917 the mass discontent exploded outwards. People demonstrating in Petrograd against hunger- lack of bread, began to fight the police. In almost no time this escalated to armed clashes involving most of the city. The

How successful was organized labor in improving the position of workers in the period form 1875 to 1900?

1005 words - 4 pages to think of laborers in a negative light. After all these strikes were defeated it was clear that organized labor was not successful and was not the right way to improve conditions for workers.The industrial era gave more power to employers than ever before. Almost all Americans had the attitude that employers were on a higher level than employees in every way and even the idea that many workers need to ban together to equal one employer

How Successful Was Organized Labor in improving the positions of workers in the period from 1875 to 1900?

1505 words - 6 pages employers due to the advancement in technology. Organized labor from 1875-1890 improved the positions of workers only to a certain level.The success of organized labor and unions helped progress workers politically both to a certain degree. The success of labor unions that played a role on the workers was quite vital as it changed many things in the United States from 1875-1890. Labor unions which evolved during this period are Knights of Labor

How tone is created in one paragraph in One day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn the paragraph this essay was written on is on page 106-107 the last paragraph

837 words - 3 pages words and describing was went on when a zek would receive a package the author could have just said that the guards went through their parcel took a few things and handed it to the prisoner without the box or the containers that it came in. Although, there aren't many descriptive words used in the paragraph the reader still gets a sense of how it might be to live in a gulag, as a prisoner. Receiving a package full of food was a waste because in

The Change in Status and Position of Jews in Russia, France and Germany in the Years 1880-1920

2224 words - 9 pages The Change in Status and Position of Jews in Russia, France and Germany in the Years 1880-1920 Throughout history Jews have been persecuted. I am going to write about how their status and position changed from 1880 to 1920 in the countries France, Russia and Germany. Anti-Semitism, the persecution of Jews, was introduced centuries before the year 1880. In Ancient times Jews were used as slaves by the Egyptian's, the

Unjustifiable Means of Modernizing Russia

743 words - 3 pages fact that Stalin focused mainly on modernizing Russia’s industry (1). Indeed, Russia made huge strides between the year 1927 and 1938, with the production of coal and steel exceeding the target for 1933 under the Five-Year Plan (2, 3) However; it was only the industrial sector that saw progress. It might have been helpful id we had a graph of the rate of other productions to see how well the Five-Year Plan worked for all the industries

How significant a problem was unemployment in the inter war years in Britain?

1078 words - 4 pages How significant a problem was unemployment in the inter war years in Britain?The First World War had a massive impact on Britain's economy. The outdated economic models in place were not sufficient to sustain a blow of such magnitude. Not only this but the empire that formed such a pillar to that economy began to diminish. Consequently the economy was left in ruins. Between 1914 and 1938 the amount of cotton processed in Britain fell by 66%. The

How successful was Hitler between 1933-45 in solving the problems which brought him to power ?

1665 words - 7 pages his projects. Lucrative-intended business men were permitted to advise Hitler in how to develop the economy and Four Year Plans were devised (on paper).Hitler's methods for decreasing unemployment were successful; since government investments were being made into creating employment, more people were working, they could thus spend their money and the inflation went down while productivity soared and the government could then collect taxes to

How successful was J.S. Mill in overcoming the problems associated with Bentham's Utilitarianism?

1120 words - 4 pages How successful was J.S. Mill in overcoming the problems associated with Bentham's Utilitarianism?"The greatest good for the greatest number" is a simple way to sum up a fairly simple idea. But despite its simplicity it still has lots of problems; in this essay I will be looking at how John Stuart Mill tries to overcome these problems.In 1789 utilitarianism was born, the brainchild of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a hedonist or someone who is

How successful was Mussolini in solving the social and economic problems he inherited?

1360 words - 5 pages of the causes of the downfall of fascist Italy. Hence, it is difficult to assess Mussolini's domestic policies in terms of the benefit it created to society as a whole.One of the key aims in Mussolini's economic policies was to build Italy's economy to a level where it could rival the great industrial powers of the world like Britain, France and Germany. At that time, Italy's economy was backward and relied heavily on the inconsistent agriculture

Similar Essays

How Accurate Is It To Say That The Growth Of Reformist Groups In The Years 1881 Was The Main Cause Of The 1905 Revolution?

1027 words - 4 pages A Level History EssayQ: How accurate is it to say that the growth of reformist groups in the years 1881 was the main cause of the 1905 revolution?Many factors contributed to the 1905 revolution but there are some arguments that the growth of reformist groups was the main cause but there are other arguments saying that there are other factors that played a bigger role so to say that the growth of reformist groups is the main cause is not entirely

How Far Did The Achievements Of Alexander Ii, Between 1855 1881, Justify His Claim To Be The "Tsar Liberator"?

545 words - 2 pages This essay is to consider the achievements and reforms of Alexander II in the view of being a revolutionary liberator.You can't really help thinking whether Alexander II's motives were entirely unselfish.He probably got his intentions and reality mixed up. Maybe he really wanted to do good but his methods doomed his good thoughts straight away. So whose fault was it that the emancipation failed? The peasants are hardly to blame, they are, after

How Far Was Nicolas Ll Personally Responsible For The Problems Of The Tsarist Regime In Russia?

1078 words - 4 pages obstinant belief clearly illustrates he stuck to his beliefs, although in his early years as tsar his uncles had huge influence. That said, the fall of the Russian Empire was not all a result of Nicholas' character and poor leadership qualities, we must also see that the huge socio-economic changes happening as well as the outbreak WW1 hugely influenced the coming about of and the timing of the revolution. These changes would be hard for any

Abraham Lincoln's Views On Slavery From The Years Of 1861 1865

1010 words - 4 pages Even from the time Abraham Lincoln was a twenty-eight year old legislator, his views on slavery were strong--he was completely against it. He felt it was "founded on both injustice and bad policy." Abraham Lincoln was elected president in November of 1860. The issue of slavery divided the nation into two--the North and the South, leaving the President with a tumultuous task at hand. Even though his personal beliefs may have led him in one