Examining The Creationist Theory Essay

2857 words - 11 pages

The Bible has been at the center of many highly controversially issues over the last 2000 years. Believers and non-believers alike have been debating whether it is the true word of God, or just a collection of stories and myths. At the forefront of this debate is the issue of creation. Many Christians believe that God created the world in 7 literal, 24-hour days. Using this theory, they would say the earth is roughly 6000 years old, but there is also a minority who believe in an old earth and that the creation story in Genesis 1 should be taken figuratively. Those who believe that the creation story is written in figurative language hold a variety of different beliefs on the issue, but at the center of their argument is the statement that: “Genesis 1 should not be taken literally, and that there is no way the earth is only 6000 years old”. In order to understand both sides, the true meaning of the Biblical text must be understood.
The most important question one must ask is how should the Bible be interpreted? The first and obvious, yet important thing to say about the Bible is that it is literature. In fact, it is a whole library of books: some of them history, some poetry, and some in the form of letters. When we approach literature, one usually asks the question “How does the author want it to be understood?” When reading the Bible, one should always try and follow the natural understanding of a passage in its context. Dr. John Lennox, who is a professor at Oxford University explains this idea well, by showing how the early Christian fathers used this “literal understanding” to counter a metaphorical interpretation.
The reformers emphasized this in their reaction against the kind of interpretation that took the four rivers mentioned in Genesis 2- the Pishon, Gibson, Tigris, and Euphrates- to represent the body, soul, spirit, and mind, respectively. By contrast with this “allegorical” method of interpretation, the Reformers adopted an approach described by the Oxford English Dictionary in its definition of literal: “that sense or interpretation (of a text) which is obtained by taking its words in their natural or customary meaning, and applying the ordinary rules of grammar.

Many of the basic teachings of the Christian faith are very straightforward and are relatively easy to extract the natural meaning. However, the natural meaning we apply to certain words or phrases may not be what the original author truly meant. The Bible was written 2000 years ago, in a foreign land, and in a foreign tongue. There are also certain words that can be taken literal and have two different meanings. In Genesis 1 there are several instances of this. The word “earth” is first used for the planet, and then a little later for the dry land as distinct from the sea. Both times the word earth is clearly meant literally, but the two meanings are different, as is clear from their context. When modern readers are trying to understand the Bible, it is...

Find Another Essay On Examining the Creationist Theory

Creationism: Does it have scientific roots?

1121 words - 5 pages In a historical context, creationism versus the theory of evolution has always been a hotly contested subject, one of the major breakthroughs being when Darwin publicized his theory of evolution. Due to that, creationism has garnered a less-than-savory reputation, but what is not realized that there are two sects of creationism: biblical creationists, and “intelligent design” creationists. When Darwin published his theory of evolution 1859, his

Evolution Essays - Is There a Conspiracy to Suppress Creation Science?

591 words - 2 pages Is There a Conspiracy to Suppress "Creation Science"?   Two Works Cited   A frequent claim in creationist literature is that there is a wealth of scientific evidence to support creationism, but that secular, mainstream scientists are suppressing its publication in peer-reviewed journals. They are not giving creation-scientists a fair shake, they claim; they are being censored.  The fact is that creation scientists are

The Debate of Orgin: Creationsim versus Evolutionism

1247 words - 5 pages is that creationist beliefs and ideals are less common among religious folk than the theory of Evolution. As a total, 36% of High School students said they believed in Creationism, and of that only 23% said they wish to be taught it in schools. That means 64% do not believe it and 77% of students wish to be taught only Evolution. So science, true science with evidence and testing supporting it, is more popular than the belief of creation. So why

The Creationism Question

2182 words - 9 pages down to the question if it is non-scientific. Many creationist theories are deeply rooted in scientific and evolutionary ideologies, such as the levels of oxygen in the atmosphere being linked to geological records and the carbon cycle, how fossils indicate that Noah’s Flood happened, and that it was regional, and the “big bang theory,” with its correlation to Genesis, leading to the question if creationism is indeed scientifically-rooted, and

Creationism: The Center of Our Universe and Life

2226 words - 9 pages practices and beliefs they all agree that the universe, earth, and life were created by a higher power and or creator. The majority of creationist believers are of a Christian faith, “In the US and UK, significant groups of Christians believe that evolution is an unproved theory which may devalue religious belief” (BBC). Most creationists believers believe the biblical description of the earth and mankind as fact, “Creationism teaches that life on Earth

Evolutionists and Creationists Will Never Agree

2574 words - 10 pages the gray moths to become the dominant form of the two species. When the Clean Air Act was enforced in 1952, this hypothesis was, in fact, the case (Arms and Camp 341-342). This modern example of natural selection supports the theory that organisms evolve over time to suit their changing environments.   A scientific creationist's views directly contrast the theory of evolution. A creationist believes that, during the six days of

Biodiversity

886 words - 4 pages The theory of evolution as opposed to the theory of creationism tries to explain why things are the way they are. Do I think we came from Monkeys? No, but neither do I believe a lot of creationist arguments set forth regarding spontaneous generation. However, what I do believe is all this hoopla is more psychological rather than literal. Meaning the material learned from studies about evolution and creationist teaches us eternal truths rather

Miller: Finding Religious Truths in Science

1236 words - 5 pages sentence with, “By arguing, as creationists do . . .” (Miller 584) Which again stereotypes creationists by portraying to the readers’ that all creationists are prone to argue on the topic of evolution, and the reader is unable to gain a clear sense of what a creationist believes in association with Christian beliefs as well as “Darwin’s God.” Miller establishes a clear emphasis of his preference of the evolution theory to sporadic creationists

Understanding Evolutionary Misunderstanding

1111 words - 4 pages figure out how God did things. These creationists came to the conclusions of an old earth and species originating by evolution” (“Misconceptions” Para. 26). Therefore, the theory of evolution itself, he implies is not opposite to creationism by any means, but rather an extension thereof which can coexist peacefully with creationist beliefs. Isaak's argument is not that Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is perfect or that any other explanation is

Evolution over Creationism for the Public School System

2562 words - 11 pages the youth of America. Roughly twenty to twenty-five percent of public school educators holding creationist views and nearly all the text books used currently contain evolution as their founding principle (Dean, Cornelia). All of the confusion over whose theory is more correct or viable for the American public school system, has caused quite a stir the between religious views which are well established theories and the undeniable facts of evolution

Evolution & Creationism in Education

3923 words - 16 pages , is it really necessary to strictly chose either an evolutionary or creationist belief? Many Christians today would answer "no" to this question. Accepting the theory of evolution as a possible explanation of how we came into existence does not deny God as our Creator or that He remains at work today. Instead, it is entirely possible to believe that God used the process of evolution to create the human species. In addition, evolution should

Similar Essays

Evolution Versus Creationism Essay

1796 words - 8 pages who followed Charles Darwin as a paragon of evolution, found evidence and answers to argue that evolution is the more reasonable theory in the question of: Where did everything come from? This paper focuses on a traditional Creationist theory as described in the Genesis story of creation in the Hebrew Bible. Evolution is the process by which different kinds of living organism are thought to have developed from earlier forms during the history of

Analysis Of The Opinion Of Judge William R. Overton

589 words - 2 pages Judge William R. Overton sets out five criteria in examining the validity of 'creation science' as a scientific theory in the case McLean vs. Arkansas. Two of these characteristics are testability against the empirical world and the tentativeness of a theory's conclusion. Overton explains why he thinks these criteria are important and why creation science fails to satisfy them.Overton feels that testability against the empirical world is a

Argument Between Science And Religion Essay

1961 words - 8 pages as a paragon of evolution, found evidence and answers to argue that evolution is the more reasonable theory in the question of: Where did everything come from? This paper focuses on a traditional Creationist theory as described in the Genesis story of creation in the Hebrew Bible. Evolution is the process by which different kinds of living organism are thought to have developed from earlier forms during the history of earth. Evolutionists think

Creationism Vs. Evolution: How Did It Really Happen?

1232 words - 5 pages . Evolutionists believe the cause of life on earth to be accidental, random atomic collisions (non-living matter), known as abiogenesis2. Creationists believe the cause to be supernatural intervention outside the physical world, God. Both groups have reasons for what they believe. However, proving either theory to be true is impossible as of now, due to the lack of provable evidence on the Evolutionist side, and the lack of evidence to refute the Creationist