Examining Whether Or Not The Boston Massacre Was A True Massacre

1184 words - 5 pages

The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines massacre as “the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty” or “a cruel or wanton murder” (m-w.com). Essentially a massacre results in either the death of many people or death by cruel means. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770, in Boston, Massachusetts and involved American colonists and British troops. The colonists, upset by recent laws enacted by the British, taunted a smaller group of British soldiers by throwing snowballs at them (Boston Massacre Historical Society). In response, the soldiers fired upon the unarmed colonists leaving five people dead and six wounded (Phelan, 131). Even though the event in Boston on March 5, 1770, in which blood was shed, and called the Boston Massacre, the actions which took place on that day did not constitute a massacre. Since only five people were killed and six wounded and there was no evidence of cruelty, the name Boston Massacre was likely a propaganda ploy by Samuel Adams to rally the colonists against the British instead of a true massacre.
After the French and Indian War ended, England had massive debt and little revenue, so Parliament passed laws taxing the American colonists to aid in paying for the British army and navy that helped protect the colonies. Parliament passed a series of laws, including the Sugar Act and Stamp Act, which taxed goods purchased by the colonists. Colonial merchants, who did not feel they should be taxed without representation in Parliament, signed non-importation agreements promising not to buy or import British goods. There was a lot of violence committed on the customs officials who were enforcing the laws. Eventually the Stamp Act was repealed and then replaced by the Townshend Acts in 1767. The Townshend Acts put heavy taxes on goods that the colonists used every day, including paper, paint, and glass (Boston Massacre Historical Society). The act also gave customs agents the authority to search property, including the colonists’ homes. The colonial response to these acts was increasing violence against the customs officials. In 1768, the British government sent troops to America to reinforce the Townshend Acts and protect the customs agents. At one point there were 4,000 British soldiers in a city of only 16,000 people (Phelan, 24). According to Phelan, there were “almost daily confrontations” between soldiers and civilians (38). There was increasing tension between the troops and the American colonists. Some children as well as adults tormented the troops by throwing snowballs and chunks of ice at the soldiers. There was also increasing tension between the colonists who were loyal to the Crown and those who were loyal to the colonies because some store owners broke their agreements about importing and selling British goods. Children threw trash and rocks at those storeowners’ buildings. Several days...

Find Another Essay On Examining Whether or not the Boston Massacre was a True Massacre

Boston Massacre Essay

1547 words - 6 pages The Boston Massacre was an extremely important event in American History. Also, it a very controversial topic. To this day, no one can really give an accurate description of the events that transpired. The Boston Massacre was not a random event at all; many actions led up to the massacre. As a result of this disaster, America was changed forever and sent on a road towards revolution. The Boston Massacre was a defining moment in American history

Boston Massacre Essay

865 words - 3 pages The town of Boston was a very unstable throughout the 1760’s. This instability quickly turned to violence in the early part of 1770’s. Tension had already begun to in the beginning of the year with various clashes between the British and the colonists. However, in early March the tensions erupted into bloodshed to create what we now know as the Boston Massacre. The occurrence of these events is a fact, however, the interpretations of them has

Overview Of The Boston Massacre

1255 words - 5 pages depict the small death count as a massacre in order to gather followers for the cause of the American Revolution. The Boston Massacre was considered a massacre by means of propaganda. Propaganda is the information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution or nation. Only five men were killed in this event, men included Crispus Attucks, but Paul Revere has drawn a portrait of the scene to

Boston Massacre Trial.

1832 words - 7 pages probably a motley rabble of saucy boys, Negroes and mulattoes, Irish teagues and outlandish jacktars. Any why should we scruple to call such a people a mob, I can't conceive, unless the name is too respectable for them. The sun is not about to stand still or go out, nor the rivers to dry up because there was a mob in Boston on the 5th of March that attacked a party of soldiers... (O'Neill)Many British Soldiers were indeed hit with fists, rocks, clubs

The Boston Massacre: The British Were Guilty

844 words - 3 pages One of the key events that sparked the Revolutionary War was the street riot known as The Boston Massacre. Which also soon brought armed rebellion throughout the colonies. The squad of musket­wielding British soldiers was at fault for the inexcusable "massacre" on the colonial mob in Boston.. The killings of March 5, termed a "massacre" by Patriot leaders became a well­known, inspirational event in all colonies to rebel against the

What Really Happened in the Boston Massacre?

1119 words - 4 pages or not Captain Preston yelled for the soldiers to fire or not. The book provides evidence and witness testimony to help the reader determine what might have happened the night of the Boston Massacre. The evidence given was from witnesses from the King and witnesses for Preston. This trial lasted for five days and ended with Preston being innocent (83). The story information given from the witnesses was different, although all the witnesses had

“Alfred was not only a great warrior, but more importantly a nation builder”. Explain whether or not this quote is a true assesment of King Alfred the Great.

1031 words - 4 pages Untitled "Alfred was not only a great warrior, but more importantly a nation builder". Explain whether or not this quote is a true assesment of Alfred. King Alfred the Great was not only a great warrior, but more importantly a nation builder. I think this quote is a true assesment of Alfred and I will explain why in the pages that follow. Alfred was born into a royal family in 849 in Wantage (now in Oxfordshire

Examining Whether or not Brutus is a Hero or Villain in Shakespeare's Play Julius Caesar

1093 words - 4 pages fates. / The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars / But in ourselves, that we are underlying. / Brutus and Caesar- what should be in that "Caesar"? / Why should that name be sounded more than yours? / Write them together, yours is a fair name" (I.ii.140-145). In this quote Cassius vents his feelings on Caesar. He knows that Caesar is power- hungry, and only wants to become king or ruler of Rome. "Why, there was a crown offered him; and, being

The Boston Massacre and Other Contributing Factors of the Revolutionary War

1344 words - 5 pages The Boston Massacre and Other Contributing Factors of the Revolutionary War The Boston Massacre was not the only cause of the Revolutionary War. There were many events before and after that also contributed to the start of this war. They were the Sugar Act, Stamp Act, Declaratory Act, Townshend Act, Quartering Act, Tea Act, the Boston Tea Party, and Coercive Acts. One of the first taxes put on the colonies by Britain was the Sugar Act

This is an essay that argues as to whether or not the "Progressive Era" was truely progressive or really retrogressive

1182 words - 5 pages , women proved that they deserved a chance at politics. In 1920, all the women's hard work paid off, and the nation made a new amendment. This amendment stated, "the rights of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States of any state on account of sex." (Bailey, A 18) This guaranteed political equality.Another example of how the United States progressed was the economic boom. Before World War I the

"A Study in Causation of the Mexican War" examines whether or not the Mexican-American War was an exercise of American Imperialism.

644 words - 3 pages Webster's dictionary defines "war" as an open armed conflict between countries or between factions within the same country. It is a conflict often resulting in the death of many innocent civilians, the destruction of private property, and sometimes the unjust treatment of prisoners. Many would agree that war ought to be a last resort to settling a conflict, as was the case for James K. Polk in the Mexican-American war.Some have argued that the

Similar Essays

The Boston Massacre Essay

688 words - 3 pages Zack 3 event. By that I mean like how nobody knows if Paul Revere was there, or if Captain Preston told the soldiers to fire. There is still a lot of stuff about the Boston massacre that still remain a mystery. We may never know the true events of that evening but we do know the great impact it has had in history.

The Boston Massacre Essay

1893 words - 8 pages Throughout history, events are sparked by something, which causes emotions to rise and tensions to come to a breaking point. The Boston Massacre was no exception; America was feeling the pressure of the British and was ready to break away from the rule. However, this separation between these two parties would not come without bloodshed on both sides. The British did not feel the American had the right to separate them from under British rule

The Boston Massacre Essay

2701 words - 11 pages soldiers were asked why they should not be sentenced to death they both replied, “Benefit of the clergy.” This was a legal device that let first offenders off without punishment, priest used it. They were not put to death. They were set free, but only after they had been branded on the thumb. The Boston Massacre was an event that only strengthened colonial America’s hatred toward the British nation. People could answer the question of whether or no

Boston Massacre Essay

1150 words - 5 pages : Revere, Paul, The bloody massacre, (1770)]The company of British soldiers in Boston has for long been contagious issue amongst various radical politicians in Boston. As captain Preston's account is given, It is a matter of too great notoriety to need any proofs that the arrival of his Majesty's troops in Boston was extremely obnoxious to its inhabitants. They have ever used all means in their power to weaken the regiments, and to bring them into