Exclusionary Rule Week Two Essay

645 words - 3 pages

Exclusionary Rule PAGE 1
Exclusionary Rule Week TwoShannon CollinsCJA/353 - Exclusionary Rule Week TwoThe question that is required for me to give consideration too is; "Should the exclusionary rule be abolished?" Before giving my debate that is set in front of me, I would first define what I believe it means."The exclusionary rule often means the rule that illegally gathered evidence may not be used in a criminal trial. The rule has several exceptions, such as when the evidence is used to impeach a defendant's testimony and when the evidence was gathered in a good faith belief that the process was legal. (Stojkovic, Kalinich, & Klofas pp. 300, 2003)So, what I take this too mean is that any evidence collected during a criminal investigation or after a crime has already been committed and the evidence is gathered in an illegal method, and not given proper due process, will not be able to be used during a defendants trial. And this could possibly be the key element that would undoubtedly set the criminal free to go and commit more crimes.However, there are exceptions to this rule. And that is, if evidence is used against the defendant to impeach his testimony or if the evidence that was gathered during an investigation or even after the crime itself was committed, if this evidence was not gathered in malice thought, or actions, it may still be able to be used depending on the circumstances surrounding the situation.What the exclusionary rule ultimately does is prevent police misconduct, which does happen infrequently but none the less does happen, just not discussed openly. I do not think that the exclusionary rule should be abolished, for personal reasons of course from a citizen of this country, and a voting one at that, I believe that we all have a right to be free of warrant less searches. Of course the Supreme Court does have the ability to create and have...

Find Another Essay On Exclusionary Rule Week Two

America Needs the Exclusionary Rule Essay

2155 words - 9 pages part of both the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments” (Arthur & Shaw 357). What can be ascertained as a result from these two passages of legal opinion delivered by the highest court in the land is that the reason we have and adhere to the exclusionary rule is in order to defend our basic constitutional rights.      However, there are some that would prefer that we not bother with said protection, and exchange our personal rights to privacy for a

Legal Evolution of the Exclusionary Rule

1901 words - 8 pages the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule. This time, police misconduct was so outrageous and shocking that Justices were forced to overturn the conviction. The case of Rochin v. California involved three deputy sheriffs who searched Mr. Rochin's dwelling without a warrant. The deputies observed the defendant swallow two pills. Mr. Rochin was taken to the hospital where the physician pumped the defendant's stomach and recovered two pills of

The Exclusionary Rule: Redefining the Crminal Justice System

1294 words - 5 pages during prosecution. Search and Seizure along with the Exclusionary Rule is also subjected to human error (Crime Control Model), however, suppression of illegally obtained evidence will be scrutinized for its collected validity (Due Process Model). Prosecutor/Judge During the judicial proceeding, two key individuals become part of the criminal justice accountability “equation.” Prosecutors will utilize the collected evidence to create a compelling

Mapp vs. Ohio: Illegal Search and Seizure

1198 words - 5 pages ever was a warrant in the first place. Even so, the evidence collected illegally was presented during the case. As reasoning, the case of Wolf vs. Colorado was cited, which stated that when the accused is being tried in a state court, he or she does not have the protection of the exclusionary rule, which protects against illegal search and seizure (Fourth Amendment "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and

Mapp Vs. Ohio

1739 words - 7 pages necessary in the true administration of justice."This opinion was the overriding emphasis of the majority of the court and the reason in which the exclusionary rule was formed and guaranteed to the states and local governments.This legal ruling has greatly affected our judicial legal system as a whole. The exclusionary rule was basically formed by choosing one priority over the other. The legal argument the justices engaged in was two fold: First

Mapp v. Ohio

1717 words - 7 pages , she appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1961, and the Court saw it necessary to review this issue and see what Wolf needed to be overruled. After reviewing the case, the Court ruled in favor of Mapp and the exclusionary rule was developed. This rule said that illegally seized evidence could not be used to convict a person in a court of law. The Court came about this reason for two key reasons: it did not coincide with the fourth and

This is an essay that describes how the 4th ammendamant effects law enforcement in America. This was used in Criminal Justice 101

1013 words - 4 pages reason to believe holds evidence of a crime."As a result of Weeks v. United States, 1914, the court embraced the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule says that evidence gained as a result of an illegal act by police cannot be used against the person from who is seized. In the case Mapp v. Ohio 1961, police entered Mapp's home thinking that will find evidence of illegal gambling. While searching the house they found no evidence of gambling, but

Mapp v. Ohio and the Fourth Amendment

918 words - 4 pages regarding the exclusionary rule and the poisonous doctrine. In the fact pattern provided, Mark Quickdraw, a detective is conducting an investigation case whose main mission is to capture a drug dealer named Sally Martin. Detective Quickdraw relies on what he heard about the drug dealer. That leads him to believe that she will be selling cocaine in the street she lives in. In connection to his belief, that shows the reasonable suspicion he had

The Fourth Amendment

3424 words - 14 pages pages I will be mentioning two exceptions to the exclusionary rule. First I will define the good faith exception then give an example and last show a court case in which the good faith exception plays a role. The case that I will explain first is United States v. Leon (1984). I will also define exigent circumstances give an example and a court case in which this particular exception also played a role. The second case that I'm going to explain

Constitutional Law in the UK

1230 words - 5 pages they do not, such motions are disproportionately granted to young offenders. When the offense is serious and the case has a high prosecution priority, the exclusionary rule does seem to increase police legality, judges are less likely to grant a motion to suppress, and the case consequently goes to trial. The deterrence rationale rests on two assumptions: Separation of legislative powers are a major objective of law enforcement officers, and the

4th Amendment

1095 words - 4 pages . (History Channel Online) In the case Michigan v. Tyler, 1978, there was evidence that two furniture dealers of committed a crime when the store was on fire. While searching an automobile there is a different standard. For example, in the case Chimel v. California, the automobile was a ?movable scene of crime.? Evidence could be gone by the time a warrant could be issued. In California v. Acevedo, 1991, the court set down a rule that covers all

Similar Essays

Balancing 4th Amendment Rights Essay

664 words - 3 pages liberties and the ability of the police to enforce the law. This need is met by exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule: the Good Faith exception and the Inevitable Discovery exception. The exclusionary rule does not extend the protections provided by the 4th Amendment. Rather, the exclusionary rule and the subsequent 1984 establishment of two exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule, the Good Faith and the Inevitable Discovery, refine the intent of the 4th

Analyze The Rationale And Purpose Of The Exclusionary Rule

868 words - 3 pages . Besides this, the evidence may used in the civil court and the hearings of the grand jury. Identify the exceptions to the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule has three exceptions. Independent Source Doctrine is the first exception. With this exception, he evidence is held in two unrelated physical ways; legal and illegal seizures. Secondly, Inevitable Discovery Doctrine. With this exception, two modes of seizing evidence are

Case Study: The Exclusionary Rule

1686 words - 7 pages The Exclusionary Rule PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: CASE STUDY: THE EXCLUSIONARY RULEThe Exclusionary RuleThe Exclusionary Rule by the Supreme Court of the United StatesAccording to Dempsey and Frost, (2011), although it is not part of the United States (U.S.) Constitution, the exclusionary rule is an interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment by the U.S. Supreme Court. Simply stated, the purpose of the exclusionary rule is intended to

Mapp Vs Ohio Essay

1670 words - 7 pages the state law. Instead they dismissed her case on other grounds, saying that the evidence was illegally seized and shouldn’t have been used in the court as it was in violation of the fourth amendment. This is called the exclusionary rule. This rule already applied to all federal cases due to weeks vs. United States but not to state cases. This rule blocked illegally obtained evidence from entering the courts, whether or not the person was in