Experimentation: Necessary Or Unnecessary? Essay

961 words - 4 pages

The recent debate on whether or not animal experimentation should be allowed has sparked uproar. When scientists think they have what they claim to be a “wonder drug,” they need a way to test the safety of the drug before it is safe for human use. At this point scientists turn to animals, because of their close resemblance to humans. With drug companies reducing experimentations and using alternatives, some people may wonder why animals undergo experimentation in the first place. While there are advantages to animal experimentation, it does not ensure success in human clinical trials, there is no law protecting any animal from cruel experimentation, and some animals should not have to live in cruel facilities.
According to several studies, animals have played a crucial role in medical advancement over the last century. The article “Alas, Animal Experiments are Still Needed,” explains that animals have been used for testing the safety of drugs and vaccines from common pain-killers to anti-cancer treatment. The article points out, “They may not be perfect and human trials are also vital, but without animals medical advances would seriously be hampered” (qtd. in “Alas” P2). The article suggests that animals are crucial to medical research because they test the safety of a drug. While it may be true that animals play a vital role in experiments, in reality, some animals do not get a second chance to live and have fun because if they are harmed, recovery takes time and is not guaranteed. The website People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) explains that nine out of ten (92%) drugs and vaccines that are tested on animals work for them, yet fail in human clinical trials. The author mentions, “They argue the potential benefits to human health justify the harm caused to animals, and that existing laws and guidelines adequately regulate the practice” (qtd. in Kretzer). Even if they regulate the practice it does no prove that the animals are not suffering.
Taking animals to the vet is the same thing as taking them to a professional scientist to work directly to minimize stress and conduct research on the problem. Most research animals do not experience anything any more invasive than what most people face during an annual physical examination. According to the article from Americans for Medical Progress it states, “When potentially uncomfortable procedures arise, anesthetics and analgesics are used to relieve discomfort” (qtd. in AMP). The reason the most people say experimentation is okay is because they don’t know the extent of it. Some scientists argue that anesthesia is administered to the animals; however, there are cases that do not need anesthesia but are still painful. If this is true, the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee should ensure anesthesia is administered to the animals; however, it still doesn’t depict from the 95% of...

Find Another Essay On Experimentation: Necessary or Unnecessary?

Should Animal Experimentation Ever Be Permitted?

1931 words - 8 pages Physicians are known to have performed vivisection on animals for hundreds of years, and nowadays animal testing remains an essential element of research in medicine and pharmacology. Animal experimentation has generated heated discussions among scientists, philosophers, and politicians. This issue is very controversial, since it involves ethical questions. While it is generally accepted that testing cosmetics on animals is unnecessary and

Human Experimentation Essay

964 words - 4 pages to unnecessary pain or discomfort be it physical, mental or emotional. Historical instances of unethical human experimentation: Although many of the most horrific examples of unethical human experimentation have occurred during times of war, unethical human experimentation has also occurred during times of peace. Some of the earliest recorded instances of unethical human experimentation occurred in the 1700’s when doctors tested vaccines on

Animal Cruelty - testing

990 words - 4 pages convulsions violently wracking their bodies without disturbing the peace of the rooms in which they "live": rooms containing row after row of plastic "shoeboxes" or stainless steel cages and the dogs will have been debarked their vocal cords severed to cut down on the noise (Newkirk, 2004).In addition, animal experimentation is not ethical. "Estimates of the number of animals used each year for experiments in United States laboratories range from 17 to 70

Bioethics

1678 words - 7 pages show the biblical view of the matter. Finally, to bring the reader to his or her own clear conclusion, without a bias opinion on the matter.THE CURRENT STATE OF THE LAWBiomedical experimentation on human subjects raises many complex legal problems that the law must deal with accordingly. For example, infringement on the rules subjects the researcher not only to criminal sanctions, but also civil sanctions (damages for harm caused), administrative

Case Study: The Benefits of Animal Testing

1757 words - 7 pages duplication of animal experiments is unnecessary. However, replicable experiments are what make findings credible. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary for these experiments to be done more than once. Clearly the benefits of animal experimentation are numerous. These experiments are able to give people new organs. These transplant surgeries give individuals a new start on life. Also, animal testing allows diabetics to take their insulin to avoid getting

Animal Experimentation and Research

2622 words - 10 pages advancements made, the use of animals remains an unethical practice. I feel that animal experimentation has the capacity to be very beneficial to medical research. However, scientists should try to prevent as much suffering as possible. Likewise, it would be a good idea to prohibit unnecessary testing and experimentation, especially with the recent development of many alternatives. Despite mounting controversy, many people still find

Animal Experimentation

809 words - 3 pages For years now people have been using animal experimentation to create new ways to help save the human race. There are people who believe that it does help, and that it is necessary to continue, while others oppose and want to fight for the elimination of animal experimentation. Scientists fight for the cures needed to help man kind, but struggle to do so as people fight against their work in progress. But as Jennifer A. Hurley stated, “History

animal experimentation: pros and cons

1945 words - 8 pages animals if not most of them. My opinion on Animal experimentation is split between both of the answers. There are many factors that split my decision on which would be more beneficial to human kind. While animal experimentation may be bad and hurts animals, there are many reasons why it is very important to many aspects of life. It may be important to have animal experimentation, but on the other hand is it necessary to put animals through a lot

Animal Experimation Position Paper (Against)

862 words - 3 pages not an opinion torturing and/or killing them is against the law. Vivisection isn't just cruel it's totally unnecessary. There are many alternatives to animal experimentation. A few examples are mechanical models and simulators, surveys of people and their culture, diet, lifestyle and other factors that affect human heath. There could also be human volunteers hired to participate in an experiment, audio visual aids, and many more creative

The Horrors of Animal Experimentation

1188 words - 5 pages , starve, or just hurt animals in any way. ‘In the name of science’ seems to be the excuse for all the harm done to animals. It is not enough. This ‘science’ talked about all the time does not seem to be working. The only thing animal experimentation does is cause pain and suffering. Now that more effective and less expensive alternatives exist, animal testing is completely unnecessary. More advanced methods to test products and medicines have

Mice or Men

1073 words - 5 pages ). Although Homo sapiens are capable of a much more complex thought and emotion than nonhuman animals, it does not give humans the right to exploit them. The unethical medical and cosmetic experimentation on animals should be ceased, due to the intentional and unnecessary killing of, and the cruel and inhumane treatment of animal test subjects. Animals in laboratories that are used for medical research are subjected to extremely painful and damaging

Similar Essays

The Necessity Of Animal Testing Essay

1299 words - 5 pages and suffering (“Animal Research Is Unethical and Scientifically Unnecessary”). Although the arguments against animal experimentation seem credible, animal testing on medicines and products are necessary in order to insure the safety of human beings. The types of experiments performed at the University of Buffalo and the University of California depicts just some of the few horrors of animal testing. According to the article, during these

Vivisection Essay

613 words - 2 pages IS ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION RIGHT?Is experimentation with laboratory animals justified or not? This subject has always been discussed all over the world. This is an important issue because it concerns science ethics. For years, various arguments have been put forward about this subject. In this essay, we are going to argue whether experimentation with laboratory animals is justified or not and point to particular effects of experiments on these

Animal Research: A Necessary Evil Essay

933 words - 4 pages It has long been debated as to whether it is ethical to use animals for experimentation. When considering whether animal research is ethically acceptable or not two main concerns must be raised. The first issue is whether it is absolutely necessary to use animals in order to acquire information that may contribute to the improvement of people’s health and well-being. The second issue is whether the use of animals is defendable on a moral

What Might Christians Think About The Use Of Animals In Medical Research?

1070 words - 4 pages experimentation raises many questions, there are also levels at which people agree or disagree with animal experimentation. Most people, my self-included, do not condone totally unnecessary scientific experiments that do not significantly benefit humans or animals. However, I do support necessary scientific experiments that will benefit humans or animals, and which are done with the utmost caution to keep the animal from suffering. I have very specific