Explain The Development Of The Ontological Argument

1313 words - 6 pages

Explain the development of the Ontological Argument

The Ontological Argument was constructed differently to arguments such as, the Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument. Whilst, these two were developed through revelation by drawing conclusions from observing external factors. The Ontological Argument was brought together through reason, this is the process of drawing conclusions through the mind’s logic.
The Ontological Argument was based on the idea that we can prove the existence of God using our reason alone, therefore using a priori knowledge. According to the Ontological Argument, the definition of God is “that then which nothing greater can be conceived”. This is a logical tautology, meaning it is true by definition.

The key figure that created this definition was St. Anselm of Canterbury whose essential claim was that “existence is a predicate of God”, which is an intrinsic quality of God’s nature. It should be noted that in the historical context that the Ontological Argument was written, the idea of God was a given. It would be incredibly rare to find a medieval scholar who did not believe in God.
St. Anselm presented this argument in his works, Proslogion. This started from a theistic stance, it was an argument in response to Psalms 14 and 53. These biblical teachings began as “The Fool says to himself ‘There is no God,”. Although, this argument may appear to be attempting to convert, it is actually a “faith seeking understanding” argument. The majority of Anselm’s audience were theists.

The first part of his argument was concerned with proving God’s existence. He began with the definition “God is that then which nothing greater can be conceived” (Id quo nihil maius potest). From this definition, he argued that “Something that exists in reality (in re) is bound to be greater than something that exists in imagination (in intellectu)”. If this is true, Anselm concluded that as the “greatest conceivable thing” – God must exist in “both reality and thought”.
This is a complicated argument to comprehend, as a result Anselm use “the Painter” illustration to help explain his argument. A painter imagines what he is going to paint before he begins painting, the idea exists in his mind. When he/she paints it, it then exist “both in reality and thought”. Finally, the painting in reality is greater than the idea alone. This illustration can be related to the idea of God.

A key quote that is part of his argument is questioning the fool. “Why then, did the fool say in his heart ‘God is not’, since it is so obvious to the rational mind that you exist supremely above all things”? Through a philosophical device known as “reductio ad absurdum”, he argued the following.

Suppose this concept: “God only exists in one’s imagination”, this would mean that God is not the “greatest conceivable thing”. However, this conclusion is a contradiction of the definition of God. “That then which nothing greater can be conceived” which is...

Find Another Essay On Explain the Development of the Ontological Argument

The Ontological Argument Essay

1593 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument The Ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. "Ontological" literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm’s "Proslogion" which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature of God. His main aim in writing the

The Ontological Argument Essay

3667 words - 15 pages Outline and discuss the various forms of the Ontological Argument The Ontological Argument. Ontology is the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being. "˜Onto' means "˜being', the ontological argument is an a priori argument. And ontological argument for God's existence is an attempt to prove rationally that God exists, without referring to Scriptures or otherwise. It differs from other arguments of that kind by taking as

The Ontological Argument

1442 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument   The Ontological Argument, put forth by Saint Anselm in his Proslogium, attempts to prove the existence of God simply by the fact that we have a particular concept of God - that God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived." Saint Anselm presents a convincing argument that many people view as the work of a genius. It is also quite often considered a failure because, in William L. Rowe's words

strengths and weaknesses of the ontological argument

983 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not

Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument

1211 words - 5 pages Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument In a world of scientific inquiry, atheism, and the assassination of God, we are often neglectful of our Glorious God’s existence. With new theories of neuropsychology, quantum physics, gene therapy, evolution, and psychobiology, we are constantly forced to edge God out of our lives, to be replaced with cold, empty scientific thought. What, with meme theory

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Ontological Argument - A Level - Information

1525 words - 7 pages Key Concepts The ontological argument attempts to prove the existence of God purely through reasoning, from his definition as the greatest or most perfect being. It takes its name from the Greek word ontos, meaning ‘existence’, because it is concerned with logical proof of God’s existence as part of his nature. It is an a priori argument, which means that it is based upon pure reasoning rather than empirical evidence or experience. It uses

Anselms Ontological Argument And The Philosophers

1838 words - 7 pages Anselm's Ontological Argument and the Philosophers      Saint Anselm of Aosta, Bec, and Canterbury, perhaps during a moment of enlightenment or starvation-induced hallucination, succeeded in formulating an argument for God's existence which has been debated for almost a thousand years. It shows no sign of going away soon. It is an argument based solely on reason, distinguishing it from other arguments for the

The Major Features of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God

1562 words - 6 pages The Major Features of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument for the existence of God was originally set out in eleventh century by St. Anselm in his Proslogian. Anselm was a Benedictine monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the great medieval theologians. It has received a lot of both support and criticism from leaning philosophers. The argument is appeals to those who already

The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas

1455 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas Descartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, developed Anselm’s argument, in attempting to prove God’s existence from simply the meaning of the word ‘God’. The ontological argument is a priori argument, such arguments use logic to prove an initial definition to be correct. The basis of these arguments depends upon

Ontological Arguments for the Existence of God

1647 words - 7 pages In the fifth Meditation, Descartes presents his second argument for the existence of God. Descartes holds that existence is perfection and so, it can be a predicate for God. I will first explain what is the ontological argument for the existence of God. Next, I will discuss why Descartes decides to bring God into His method of philosophy. I will then try to argue that existence is a perfection and that as a predicate for God, existence reveal

Describe the ontological argument with reactions and contributions made to it by individual philosophers

1109 words - 4 pages The ontological argument is concerned with being it is an a priori argument for the existence of God. That is, it is not dependent on experience but is an argument where all knowledge is derived from the mind. It is also a type of argument that follows reason and not ones senses. The ontological argument is based on words and their meanings. Anselm (1033-1109), was the first philosopher to put forward the ontological argument in a logical form

Similar Essays

"The Ontological Argument": Explain The Traditional Forms Of The Ontological Argument Put Forward By Anselm And Descartes

1584 words - 6 pages a) Explain the traditional forms of the ontological argument put forward by Anselm and Descartes. (33 marks)The ontological argument is a deductive a priori argument that attempts to prove God's existence from logical reasoning. The first and best known ontological argument was proposed by St Anselm (Archbishop of Canterbury) in his writings 'Proslogion', however since then variations have been developed by other philosophers such as Rene

Explain Anselm’s Version Of The Ontological Argument For Proving God’s Existence And Gaunilo’s Criticism

1033 words - 5 pages St Anselm’s argument was from a theistic stance, he had produced the Ontological Argument in a time period where the existence of God was a given. It was very rare to find atheists, therefore it may seem that the Ontological argument was used to convert atheists, it was a response to Psalms 14 and 15 which begins as “The Fool says to himself “there is no God”. However, the argument is actually from a “faith seeking understanding” view and only

Critique Of The Ontological Argument Essay

926 words - 4 pages Are human beings morally obliged to be mutually honest in a true friendship? Can a real friendship continue without honesty? For instance, let’s say friend A is good friends with both friends B and C, whom happen to be married with each other. Friend A finds out that husband B is having extra-marital sex without the consent of wife C. Should Friend A be honest to husband B’s wife C? I believe that friend A does have an obligation to tell

Exploring The Ontological Argument Essay

2212 words - 9 pages contradiction to suppose that we can imagine a being greater than the greatest possible being that can be imagined.)” (Himma, n.d., sec. 2a para. 2). 6. “Therefore, God exists.” (Himma, n.d., sec. 2a para. 2). To better explain the ontological argument of St. Anselm, I will explain each premise so that intention and purpose of the argument is clear. The first premise is pretty clear already. God is supposed the greatest being out there. Nothing