Exposing The Weakness Of Saint Anselm Of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument

1211 words - 5 pages

Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument

In a world of scientific inquiry, atheism, and the assassination of God, we are often neglectful of our Glorious God’s existence. With new theories of neuropsychology, quantum physics, gene therapy, evolution, and psychobiology, we are constantly forced to edge God out of our lives, to be replaced with cold, empty scientific thought. What, with meme theory, genetic predisposition, evolutionary spontaneous generation, dark matter, super string theory, multi-layered universes, and the neurological reasons behind consciousness, we are becoming more and more distant from the reality that is God.

This is disappointing. This is painful. And thankfully, this is avoidable. We must look no further than Saint Anselm and his Ontological Argument of 1077 B.C., and we are again reminded of the irrefutability of the Lord’s existence, and His awe-inspiring plan for us all.

Saint Anselm of Canterbury is not only the theologian responsible for one of the most potent arguments against atheism, but he is also the archbishop responsible for interpreting the Holy Bible in support of the Holy Crusades for Pope Urban II. Without Anselm, we would be without the Ontological Proof, and we never would have waged war against the infidel Turks, or the heathen Jews. So, we are doubly indebted to Saint Anselm, and should take this opportunity to learn a little more about him:

Anselm was one of the early Church Fathers who attempted to justify faith, not by reference to Holy Scripture, but through the use of logic and reason alone. Having been inspired by Saint Augustine’s The City of God, (413-426,) Anselm understood that to defeat Paganism, he must support his arguments using methods employed by pagans. This he did, in 1077 with Monolgion, in 1078 with Proslogion, and in 1098 with Cur Deus Homo. His major contribution to apologetics and theology is now called the Ontological Proof, which, essentially, is a set of logical steps which show that God must exist.

One thousand years later, his proof is still a powerful argument against the plague of atheism. With it, we can turn the tables on physicists, biologists, chemists, and psychologists. We can fall asleep at night knowing in our soul that God does indeed exist. We can use the scientist’s weapons of logic and rhetoric to injure that scientist’s theories.

But, the skeptic asks, how can we use a one thousand year old argument now, in the year 2000? Is it not out of date? Is it still applicable in a world of black holes, nuclear physics, Einstein-Rosen bridges, and self-replicating memes?

I answer in the affirmative, and I will relate the Ontological Argument in a more contemporaneous way, with the hope that my more simplistic, understandable methods will prove effective.

Anselm’s Ontological Argument:

The essential points of Anselm’s arguments are these:

God exists, for there is goodness in the...

Find Another Essay On Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument

The Ontological Argument Essay

1442 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument   The Ontological Argument, put forth by Saint Anselm in his Proslogium, attempts to prove the existence of God simply by the fact that we have a particular concept of God - that God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived." Saint Anselm presents a convincing argument that many people view as the work of a genius. It is also quite often considered a failure because, in William L. Rowe's words

The Ontological Argument Essay

1593 words - 6 pages Proslogion is not to directly prove the existence of God but to moreover, to show the relationship between faith and reason. Anselm wanted to understand the object of the belief. He is also not trying to defend his belief against the atheist and neither is he trying to convince the atheist that God exists. The ontological argument differs from other arguments in favour of God as it is an ‘a priori’ deductive argument, a priori meaning that can

The Ontological Argument

3667 words - 15 pages something for it to exist. Since this argument has appeared it has been debated by philosophers, many saying it doesn't work but they can't always say why. It is not an argument that has been settled and is still after 1000 years very much alive today.An argument of this kind was first proposed by Anselm of Canterbury in his Proslogion created in 1077, a meditative prayer like book by the saint. The writing becomes a prayer. "˜The foolish man

The Major Features of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God

1562 words - 6 pages The Major Features of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument for the existence of God was originally set out in eleventh century by St. Anselm in his Proslogian. Anselm was a Benedictine monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the great medieval theologians. It has received a lot of both support and criticism from leaning philosophers. The argument is appeals to those who already

The Weakness of Ophelia

2125 words - 9 pages . The Valentine’s Day song is the main example. "To-morrow is Saint Valentine’s Day, All in the morning betime, And I a maid at your window, To be your Valentine. Then up he rose, and donn’ed his clothes, and dupp’d the chamber-door; let in the maid, that out a maid never departed more." (4.5.52). Why else would Ophelia sing such an obviously sexual song? The maid in the song, who may symbolize Ophelia, loses her virginity on the 14th of

Exposing The Irony of McCarthyism

680 words - 3 pages Both The Crucible and “Talkin’ John Birch Paranoid Blues” agree with the hypocrisy and lack of sense that the time called the Red Scare or McCarthyism began, fed and ended. The Crucible uses the Salem Witch Trials as an allegory to show this side of the Red Scare while Bob Dylan uses an obvious sarcasm to show his point of view. Both Bob Dylan and Arthur Miller expose the irony of the time period called McCarthyism. The Crucible was written to

The Weakness of Servant Leadership

572 words - 2 pages After reading various essays and commentaries on servant leadership I thought about a criticism of the theory that wasn't addressed in the readings. Are servant leaders taken advantage of and in certain instances seen as pushovers rather than true leaders? If we review the basic concept of servant leadership, my definition would be a leader who does what’s necessary to ensure his followers are successful. Is this what you really want from a

Anselms Ontological Argument And The Philosophers

1838 words - 7 pages Anselm's Ontological Argument and the Philosophers      Saint Anselm of Aosta, Bec, and Canterbury, perhaps during a moment of enlightenment or starvation-induced hallucination, succeeded in formulating an argument for God's existence which has been debated for almost a thousand years. It shows no sign of going away soon. It is an argument based solely on reason, distinguishing it from other arguments for the

Ontological Arguments for the Existence of God

1647 words - 7 pages perfection. Therefore, Descartes’ idea of God contains the idea of existence and perfection in itself and consequently, God must exist. This claim correlates with St. Anselm’s ontological argument for the existences of God. Anselm claims that God is that “than which nothing greater can be thought” (Robinson p.18). If this being exists in the mind, then a greater being can be conceived, one that exists in the actual real world. Thereby, the God that

Exposing Lies of Scientology

1813 words - 7 pages Tom Cruise, John Travolta, Kirstie Alley, Sony Bonno and Lisa Marie Presley all have one similar lifestyle. Yes, they are all famous celebrities, however, this lifestyle has more effect on a person than any career possibly could. These celebrities, among many more, are part of what has been called “The Church of Hollywood.” They are all Scientologists. The Church of Scientology is one manufactured by a former science fiction writer who could

Perfect Island Objection by Anselm of Canterbury

1816 words - 7 pages that it highlights the distinctions between fictitious objects labelled as ‘in existence’ and physical objects in realty. However, I would argue that both objections give us good reasons to reject the entirety of Anselm’s Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Works Cited Simon Blackburn, Think, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 1999, p. 154 Saint Anselm

Similar Essays

"The Ontological Argument": Explain The Traditional Forms Of The Ontological Argument Put Forward By Anselm And Descartes

1584 words - 6 pages a) Explain the traditional forms of the ontological argument put forward by Anselm and Descartes. (33 marks)The ontological argument is a deductive a priori argument that attempts to prove God's existence from logical reasoning. The first and best known ontological argument was proposed by St Anselm (Archbishop of Canterbury) in his writings 'Proslogion', however since then variations have been developed by other philosophers such as Rene

Explain The Development Of The Ontological Argument

1313 words - 6 pages was based on the idea that we can prove the existence of God using our reason alone, therefore using a priori knowledge. According to the Ontological Argument, the definition of God is “that then which nothing greater can be conceived”. This is a logical tautology, meaning it is true by definition. The key figure that created this definition was St. Anselm of Canterbury whose essential claim was that “existence is a predicate of God”, which is

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Ontological Argument

983 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not

Exploring The Ontological Argument Essay

2212 words - 9 pages those arguments, ontological arguments still provide a phenomenal vehicle for ontological discussion through St. Anselm’s original ideas and argument, objections raised, and revisions of previous arguments. The ontological argument still intrigues philosophers despite potential objections and flaws found in it. St. Anselm: The First Ontological Argument St. Anselm came up with the first and most well-known ontological argument (Oppy, 2012, para. 2