Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument
In a world of scientific inquiry, atheism, and the assassination of God, we are often neglectful of our Glorious God’s existence. With new theories of neuropsychology, quantum physics, gene therapy, evolution, and psychobiology, we are constantly forced to edge God out of our lives, to be replaced with cold, empty scientific thought. What, with meme theory, genetic predisposition, evolutionary spontaneous generation, dark matter, super string theory, multi-layered universes, and the neurological reasons behind consciousness, we are becoming more and more distant from the reality that is God.
This is disappointing. This is painful. And thankfully, this is avoidable. We must look no further than Saint Anselm and his Ontological Argument of 1077 B.C., and we are again reminded of the irrefutability of the Lord’s existence, and His awe-inspiring plan for us all.
Saint Anselm of Canterbury is not only the theologian responsible for one of the most potent arguments against atheism, but he is also the archbishop responsible for interpreting the Holy Bible in support of the Holy Crusades for Pope Urban II. Without Anselm, we would be without the Ontological Proof, and we never would have waged war against the infidel Turks, or the heathen Jews. So, we are doubly indebted to Saint Anselm, and should take this opportunity to learn a little more about him:
Anselm was one of the early Church Fathers who attempted to justify faith, not by reference to Holy Scripture, but through the use of logic and reason alone. Having been inspired by Saint Augustine’s The City of God, (413-426,) Anselm understood that to defeat Paganism, he must support his arguments using methods employed by pagans. This he did, in 1077 with Monolgion, in 1078 with Proslogion, and in 1098 with Cur Deus Homo. His major contribution to apologetics and theology is now called the Ontological Proof, which, essentially, is a set of logical steps which show that God must exist.
One thousand years later, his proof is still a powerful argument against the plague of atheism. With it, we can turn the tables on physicists, biologists, chemists, and psychologists. We can fall asleep at night knowing in our soul that God does indeed exist. We can use the scientist’s weapons of logic and rhetoric to injure that scientist’s theories.
But, the skeptic asks, how can we use a one thousand year old argument now, in the year 2000? Is it not out of date? Is it still applicable in a world of black holes, nuclear physics, Einstein-Rosen bridges, and self-replicating memes?
I answer in the affirmative, and I will relate the Ontological Argument in a more contemporaneous way, with the hope that my more simplistic, understandable methods will prove effective.
Anselm’s Ontological Argument:
The essential points of Anselm’s arguments are these:
God exists, for there is goodness in the...