This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Federalists And Antifederalists Essay

2939 words - 12 pages

Frustration was mounting. As he sat in the North Carolina ratifying convention and listened to the roll call of their membership, William Richardson Davie must have worried that the federalist movement in his state would die a slow and agonizing death before him. Davie, an ardent proponent of federalism and its promotion of a strong national and central government, had spent nearly a year arguing and debating the necessity and importance of ratifying the newly-proposed federal Constitution. The membership’s list of names forebode trouble for Davie and his federalist colleagues and he realized as the names were read aloud that the convention’s membership favored those who opposed the ...view middle of the document...

Now, after many months of discussions, debates, and published writings, it was July 1788 and the North Carolina General Assembly had finally called for a state ratifying convention to be held in the Town of Hillsborough. In the July heat, sitting in the meeting room of the local Presbyterian Church, William Davie quickly realized the momentous significance of the fact that with local elections for state delegates completed the previous March, the result was that far fewer Federalists were in attendance at the convention. A majority of the 284 delegates present were Antifederalists and had over the previous months repeatedly voiced their fervent opposition to the federal Constitution and its ratification. For Davie, it looked unlikely the federalists would prevail in Hillsborough and that North Carolina would ratify the federal Constitution. With delegates still arriving, it was already known that only three states, New York, Rhode Island, and North Carolina, had not yet ratified the federal Constitution. This meant that with the requisite number of nine states having ratified the Constitution, these remaining states would continue in their own sovereignty and remain outside the realm of the United States of America; unless and until ratification, these three states could not join the Union.
William Davie knew that with the unfortunate and unequal number of Federalists and Antifederalists present at the ratifying convention, he would have to take a prominent role in defending the actions taken in Philadelphia the previous year. Since the Federalists consisted of only thirty-one percent of the state ratifying convention’s membership, Davie shouldered the burden of defending the Constitution and upholding the Federalist cause. But could he? Would he be able to convince most of the delegates that the best course of action was to ratify the federal Constitution and become a member state of the United States of America? The answer is no. For all his worrying and foreboding, William Davie was not able to persuade most of his fellow delegates to ratify the federal Constitution . For the Antifederalist in 1788, the idea of joining a government with central powers as espoused in the Constitution was intolerable; Antifederalist were not going to ratify the Constitution as written and they were not going to compromise.
This intolerance resulted in the state of North Carolina remaining out of the Union and on its own for another sixteen months. In 1789, with a growing sense of separation and isolation, the North Carolina General Assembly called for a second ratifying convention. With this convention, held in Fayetteville in November 1789, North Carolina finally ratified the federal Constitution and officially became a member of the federal Union. But why, at the precipice of nationhood, would North Carolina need two years and two ratifying conventions to become a member state of the United States of America? What forces were evident...

Find Another Essay On Federalists and Antifederalists

Criticisms of the Constitution and their Legitimacy

1579 words - 7 pages unfounded. The Federalists presented a more sufficient argument in the justification of the Constitution. They argued that the Constitution established a government that could provide a safe state for its citizens and foster “stable republic order” (Caesar 84). The Antifederalists’ criticism of the wide scope of government under the Constitution is negated by the Federalists valid argument that only under a federal system could a strong national

The Bill of Rights Essay

1663 words - 7 pages , the Federalists however felt the articles were weak and ineffective, which some people say Shay’s Rebellion helped to prove, because there was no standing army, which was something the Antifederalists objected to having as well. Their fears however, were not the thing the Federalists were striving to achieve. They felt a strong central government was necessary for the newly forming United States of America. This was because the country needed

California World History Standard 10.2

574 words - 2 pages become the law, it needed approval from 9 out of 13 colonies. There was a severe debate over the passing of the new Constitution. The supporters of the Constitution were called the Federalists. They believed that the new government would provide a better equilibrium connecting national and state powers. Their adversaries, the Antifederalists, were worried that the new Constitution would give the central government too much power. The

Factionalism According To James Madison

1179 words - 5 pages Constitution were given to the delegates to be presented to their respective state legislatures for ratification. The proponents of the new Constitution, christened Federalists, actively sought after its passage. While its opponents, christened Antifederalists, feared the perceived loss of states’ rights and the absence of a bill of rights. Hamilton, Jay, and Madison were fervent Federalists. Thus, they were in full support of the passing of

Creating the Constitution

2380 words - 10 pages Sept. 2011. Semonche, J. “The Debate Over the Constitution: Federalists vs. Antifederalists” n.d. Web. 6 Sept 2011. ThinkQuest. “Federalists and Anti-Federalists.” N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Sept. 2011. ""

Federalist versus Antifederalists

2359 words - 9 pages From the birth of our Republic, Federalists and Antifederalist debated the nature of democracy and representation. One argument involved competing views of “communities of interest” and the nature of representation. Federalists desired a strong national government ruled by the political elite. Leaders should be isolated from the public and focus on making broad decisions at the national level. Antifederalists favor promotion of local

Title: Was The Federalists Papers really propaganda in the same sense as the Declaration of Independence and Paine's Common Sense?

749 words - 3 pages as The Federalists Papers. They are among the greatestcontributions to political theory.Despite the Antifederalists efforts, ratification preceded quickly, and in 1788 theConstitution was theoretically possible to go into effect. It can be insinuatedthat the Federalists Papers had a definite impact in the minds of Americans,whose attitudes are usually a reflection of the results of Congress's actions.In conclusion, allof the above can be considered in some way a form of propaganda. It promotedmany practical ideologies, which were intended to benefit the overall welfareof every American.

Federalists in the 19th Century

1319 words - 6 pages The formation of the United States Constitution in 1787 led the people of the United States to divide into two groups: the Federalists and the Anti Federalists. They both agreed in the some political thoughts as well as disagreed. Most distinguishable, the Federalists favored the central government, whereas the Antifederalists opposed it. In order to settle the new country after the Revolutionary War, the Hamilton Federalists best represent the

Articles of Confederation vs. the Constitution

839 words - 3 pages in the past had ever tried or succeeded with the ideas of republicanism. America's first constitution was called the Articles of Confederations and it was drafted in 1777. This constitution only lasted for eleven year because the Federalists wanted to strengthen the government. In 1788, the new Federal Constitution was ratified by all the states except North Carolina and Rhode Island. In Document A, James Madison discusses how the "smallest state

The Inevitable Two-Party System in the U.S

2117 words - 9 pages ). Washington likely mentioned the issue in his Farewell Address due to the rising heat on the issue of state power versus federal power. The first political parties in America began to form at the end of the 18th century. "The conflict that took shape in the 1790s between the Federalists and the Antifederalists exercised a profound impact on American history." The two primary influences, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, worked together

paper from hell

2431 words - 10 pages The Federalist Papers are a series eighty –five essays published in The Independent Journal and The New York Packet from 1787-1788, promoting the ratification of the United States Constitution. They were written in response to the Antifederalists who were opposed to the ratification of the Constitution. After the Federal Convention wrote the proposed Constitution and sent it to the Confederation Congress who in turn sent it to the states for

Similar Essays

The Causes Of The Revolutionary War Viewpoints Of Federalists, Antifederalists

1819 words - 7 pages The Road to Revolution The American Revolution was a great turning point in American history. When The American Colonies were first established in the new world, the colonies needed a lot of support from Britain, their mother country and ruler. The thirteen original colonies; Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and

Political Parties Essay

818 words - 4 pages and Antifederalists were a couple of the main causes that led to the rise of political parties in the 1790’s. The conflict between the Antifederalists and the Federalists had a tremendous impact on the formation of political parties. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were both members of President George Washington's Cabinet, but had completely different views on politics. The differences in opinions made the people split into two

Beliefs Of The Anti Federalists Essay

753 words - 3 pages was exactly opposite of what they are. According to the proper definition, the Anti-Federalists were really more “Federal” than the so-called Federalists. Many Anti-Federalists felt this way because “they took their bearings from the principles of federalism laid down in the Articles.” (Allen viii) The Anti-Federalists say they stuck with the Articles of Confederation and stayed with the government. Before the Federalists took on their

Early Government Essay

1486 words - 6 pages were respectable and embraced the cultured and propertied groups. 3) They lived in settled areas along the seaboard, not in the raw backcountry. They were in outlook rather closely akin to the conservative Loyalist group of Revolutionary days. 4) Remaining Loyalists assisted in the ratification. 5) Federalists strongly supported the Constitution. Antifederalists were alarmed by the absence of a bill of rights. Federalists assured them it