This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig: War Hero Or Butcher Of The Somme?

1124 words - 4 pages

Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig: War hero or butcher of the Somme?

Many historians see the Somme as one of, if not the most, significant
events of the war. The devastating casualties and deaths of the war
left thousands without their loved ones, a whole generation was lost
at the Somme. After the devastation of the war, many soldiers blamed
Haig. It was thought that Haig's leadership was to blame for the
tremendous amount of casualties and deaths of the Somme. The soldiers
were thought to have followed their orders courageously, precisely and
so that everything went exactly as planned, but they were let down by
their leaders.

However, many historians now believe that General Haig was not
entirely to blame for the failure at the Somme, and that it was not a
military disaster, but why?

There are many arguments for General Haig being the butcher of the
Somme, but also many for him being a hero.

Firstly General Haig was in charge of the attack from the British on
the first day of the Somme. This was a terrible failure. Many died due
to Haig expecting the artillery to work much better than what it did.
Barbed wire and areas of the enemy trenches were left fully intact
therefore allowing enemies much more ease in setting up weapons to
hold off attacks. The barbed wire was not destroyed mainly due to Haig
rarely visiting the front line. If he had have visited more often then
he would have seen the when barbed wire was hit by artillery it just
bounced up to fall back down in more of a tangle than what it was
originally. Also on the first day of the Somme General Haig ordered
the troops to walk steadily across no-mans land rather than move
quickly therefore getting there much later than the French troops
leaving them isolated. If the British troops had moved more quickly
then they would have been there to support the French troops and would
probably have been able to take over some of the enemy trenches.

General Haig also used tanks very badly during the war. He decided to
use tanks at the Somme when they were very slow and prone to breaking
down so he gave the secret away. He rarely used them on dry ground,
where they were much more effective. General Haig tried to use new
ideas such as the "creeping barrage" which failed killing many of the
British troops because the guns were not accurate enough. The
"creeping barrage" was when guns were fired just in front of the
troops causing a big cloud of mist and flying shrapnel which the
troops would run through, then more guns would be fired just ahead of
the troops again. This would continue right up to the enemy lines; it
would confuse the enemies so that they couldn't see who they were
...

Find Another Essay On Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig: War hero or butcher of the Somme?

Sir Douglas Haig Essay

990 words - 4 pages Intro - Sir Douglas Haig was born in Edinburgh on June 19, 1861, and educated at Clifton and Brasenose College in oxford. Haig was a career soldier but had been given job of commander in chief of the British Expeditionary force recently after he had first battle of Ypres and at Mons. To start off with there is much evidence which suggests that Haig was an uncaring general for example on the one hand Haig was called the butcher of Somme & he

Haig and the Somme, GCSE coursework questions

4894 words - 20 pages years. However, the fact that he believed that his plans would prove successful show that he did not intentionally send his men to be slaughtered. Nevertheless this fact may again be the result of his false optimism, or yet another account of Haig's incapability as a General. Indeed, the extent to which to which Haig is falsely informed about the progress made on the first day of the Somme shows that he was clearly ignorant of the feelings and

Air Chief Marshal Sir Hugh Dowding: The Battle of Britain

1952 words - 8 pages up the spirits of the British people, and had not refused to give in to Germany, then the Battle would have been lost. But the man who actually kept the Germans from taking control of Britain was Air Chief Marshal Sir Hugh Dowding. He not only won the Battle, but quite possibly saved the free world. Dowding won the Battle by his backing and use of radar, his insistence of a strong fighter force instead of a bomber force, and his brilliant

Evaluation of Actions of General Douglas Haig

2819 words - 11 pages Evaluation of Actions of General Douglas Haig Some historians believe that General Douglas Haig was a butcher because of the amount of people killed in action at the Somme. Others believe he was not to blame as many of the failures were mostly not of his creation. In truth, Haig is in the middle of this scale as the evidence and reasoning I am going to present. General Haig studied at Sandhurst and graduated. He was

Bibliography of Field Marshal Erwin Rommel

1864 words - 7 pages borrowed from the British and utilized by the Blitzkrieg. Also, Guderian gives his personal thoughts on F. M. Rommel and his abilities as a commander.Halder, Col.Gen. Franz. The Halder Diaries: The Private War Journal of Colonel General Franz Halder. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1976. This work is a genuine look into the German General Staff as written by Field Marshal Franz Halder. This journal is an important piece of historical literature

To what extent was Douglas Haig the most successful theatre commander, in the British Century of Warfare 1899 - 2003?

3549 words - 14 pages 1MORGAN FARGOTO WHAT EXTENT WAS DOUGLAS HAIG THE MOST SUCCESSFUL THEATRE COMMANDER, IN THE BRITISH CENTURY OF WARFARE 1899 - 2003?It has been said that a theatre commanders goal during wartime is "to bring that conflict to an end on favourable terms," through efficient and effective command. However, Douglas Haig has been deemed a theatre commander who "must be indicted…for willful blunders and wicked butchery" during World War One. This

Battle of the Somme

1148 words - 5 pages The Battle of the Somme epitomizes the harsh realities of trench warfare for the Allies and represents the negligent battle planning and technological advancements that are associated with the stalemate of World War One. Trench warfare was common across the Western Front, with similar strategies being employed by both opposing sides. Sir Douglas Haig, one of the British coordinators for the Somme offensive is blamed with an offensive strategy

The Battle of Somme

1932 words - 8 pages Verdun. Initially, Haig opposed a battle on the Somme front, but in the end agreed that the Somme would lead to a final victory because of the great trenches. On December 19, 1915, Douglas Haig became the new commander of the BEF’s “British Expedition Force” First Army. He was a hard person to get to know and seemed to have no concern for the human suffering caused by the war. His colleagues found him strange because of his spiritual practices

Battle of the somme

619 words - 2 pages loosing so many trying to fight. Commandeer Ludendorff thought if this kept up the war would become a military struggle and Germany would end up loosing.The planning:Planning for this battle began in December 1915. Britain's new commander in chief, general sir Douglas Haig wanted to attack in Flanders in the north. General Joffre suggested that that the British army attack that the Somme river.In February the Germans forced a change in the original

Battle of the Somme

860 words - 3 pages of controversy.He committed great masses of troops to an unsuccessful offensive on the Somme Rover, which cost 420,000 British casualties.After helping to stop the last German offensive of the war, Haig showed perhaps his best generalship in leading the victorious Allied assault beginning on August 8th. He was created an Earl in 1919 and died on 29th January 1928 in London.KitchenerHerbert Kitchener was born on 24th June 1850 near Listowel in Co

Battle of the Somme

1053 words - 5 pages The Battle of the Somme, or “humanity’s bloodiest battle”, took place between July 1st and November 18th, 1916 (Wikipedia). The German Empire was pitted against the French and British Empires, resulting in over 1,000,000 men wounded or killed, 60,000 of them being on the first day of the battle. This battle was one of the largest and bloodiest battles on World War I, making it consequential to the French, British, and German Empires. Although

Similar Essays

Defining Field Marshal General Sir Douglas Haig

1340 words - 5 pages death. I believe that Field Marshal General Sir Douglas Haig earned the title of Earl and the £100 000 given to him given to him by King George V and the government. And that he was a hero, not a leader who unnecessarily butchered his own men.

Field Marshall Haig: The Butcher Of The Somme

3202 words - 13 pages Field Marshall Haig: the Butcher of the Somme In order to answer the main essay question on whether or not Field Marshall Haig was the Butcher of the Somme I will include points for and against and also quotes to sum up and give a complete answer on my opinion of Field Marshall Haig. When field Marshall Haig was appointed commander of the British forces, he was 54 years old. Before this time Haig had had a long and

General Haig A Butcher Not War Hero

1275 words - 5 pages Sir Douglas Haig was born on the 19th June 1861. The Field Marshal was very highly ranked in the duration of The Great War. Haig was a British soldier and a senior Commander of The British Expeditionary Force from the year of 1915. General Haig is notorious for commanding the Battle Of The Somme and also renowned for the third battle of Ypres and various other victories leading to The Triple Entente’s victory of WW1. After the war, Haig was

Does General Haig Deserve To Be Remembered ‘The Butcher Of The Somme’?

1617 words - 7 pages war, our leadership was flawless – perfect. There was an obvious genius for pure generalship which has made Sir Douglas Haig fit to rank with any general of past or modern times.’ This source had clearly showed that General Haig was overall not a butcher – by the fact that he had at least done the first half of the war well. Historian John Terraine, writing in his study of the Somme, The Smoke and the Fire (1980) had claimed that ‘The truth is