The fight for gay rights escalated to a debate between Separation of Church and State. This doctrine was created in the United States Supreme Court in 1947. This doctrine prohibits any federal, state, or local government preference or support for religion. This doctrine exists because of the first amendment of the Bill of Rights which basically states that there should not be a national church. You are free to exercise and express your religion, freedom of speech, and you can gather and petition the federal United States government (U.S.). Religious leaders think that it is against their religion to support the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender, LGBT community, because it is sinful. While many people of religion are leaders in the community and organizations, discrimination against the LGBT community is relevant not only in churches, but in public places and organizations.
Same Sex Marriage
According to Geoffrey Stone, author of Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime, from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism, describes the Separation of Church and State in two forms, “Either they discriminate against certain religions (‘Jews may not serve as jurors’), or they endorse particular religions (‘schoolchildren must recite the Lord's Prayer’)”(Stone). California’s Proposition 8, wanted the ban of same-sex marriage. This proposition did not violate the church and state according to Stone because it did not restrict religious freedom or forces those to a certain religion. Some would argue that it does violate the Separation of Church and State. It put religious beliefs into law, trying to enforce that what they are doing is sinful. Some people says that Proposition 8 discriminates against the LGBT community, and it is in violation of the Equal Protection Clause (Stone). The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution which prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection.
The argument for gay marriage by James Kellard, writer of news articles, political analyses, and book and travel reviews, states that the ban of gay marriage is to protect the institution of marriage. Kellard says that the argument is “ridiculous” and “the main reason people in the US seem to get married is out of love” (Kellard). There are many threats to the institution of marriage that occur other than same-sex marriage such as, the marriage for money and for health insurance, etc. The opposing view by Peter Sprigg, a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council, says that fewer people would marry if same sex marriage was legalized that fewer people would get married. When California legalized same-sex marriage for only a few months, “91% of opposite-sex couples who lived together in California were married. In other words, only 9% of heterosexual couples in California have rejected the institution of marriage, while over 80% of the homosexual couples rejected...