This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Fighting The System In 12 Angry Men And A Time To Kill

2472 words - 10 pages

Legal dramas provide audiences the opportunity to enter the world of the courtroom in addition to dramatized emotions as reflected by the characters (typically the lawyer and juries) of the film. The Post-Classical era film 12 Angry Men (Sidney Lumet, 1957) and the Post-Modernist film A Time to Kill (Joel Schumacher, 1996) consist of a goal-driven protagonist finding the truth and meaning in societal paradoxes while overcoming strong adversity. However, the legal drama genre shift between the Post-Classical and Post-Modernist eras (as seen in the two films) from a character-driven genre to an expository-character genre is attributed to the paranoia brought on by forces such as McCarthyism in the 1950’s and America’s internal conflicts and mistrust of the government in the 1990’s.
The drama genre goes back to the early nineteenth century and lays the foundation for character and plot as reflected in legal dramas of today. “The proper fate for the dramatic hero or heroine was to learn Christian resignation by preserving moral purity in the face of great trials and tribulations,” (Cawelti 38). The idea of good versus evil, right versus wrong, stemmed from the belief that to be “good” was having a strong faith in God and the resultant courage to act on one’s good intentions. This genre myth carried over to the middle of the twentieth century and served as the basis of the first legal dramas. However, Cawlti states, the emphasis on God were taken out of the moral equation to “seek for other means of affirming transcendent moral truths in secular, naturalist world,” (47).
Regardless of the inclusion or exclusion of God in the dramatic genre myth, the consistency of the main protagonist “doing the right thing” and “fighting the injustices of the world” was (and continues to be) a driving force of legal drama narratives. Films that come before or after the Post-Classical era, such Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, To Kill a Mockingbird, and Runaway Jury, all support this myth. The strong emphasis on emotions and inner suffering due to societal injustice rings true throughout the genre. This myth allows the audience to become emotionally in the story from the outset as they form expectations based on other legal dramas they have seen in the past, enhancing the overall appeal of the genre.
The drama’s core foundation of an individual fighting to preserve moral purity was a key element in the legal drama during the 1950’s and this tradition carries on today. In both 12 Angry Men and A Time to Kill, the two male protagonists must make the “morally right” decision regardless of the opposition’s attempt to bully them into compromising their principals in favor of the establishment. This idea of “moral purity” reflects the 1950’s ideology that “money and success were important values; that heterosexual romance, marriage, and the family were proper social forms,” (Cawelti 212). Furthermore, Cawelti’s idea that “the state, police, and legal system were...

Find Another Essay On Fighting the System in 12 Angry Men and A Time to Kill

Descriptions of the Character in the 12 Angry Men

897 words - 4 pages . Juror #11- He is a watchmaker. He always wondered why the boy came back to the house when he killed his dad. He votes not guilty. He gets made at juror #7 saying he is not man enough to explain his reasoning’s. He is very observant. Juror #12- He is in the advertisement business. He suggests that everyone explains what they think of the boy. He always switches back and forth with the people that have the better agreements. But at the end he votes not guilty and he doesn’t swath back.

12 Angry Men Essay

1776 words - 7 pages , able to convince the other jurors to vote not guilty. This demonstrates that of an individual who displays strength and fortitude when defending his decision can make a positive impact.References:12 Angry Men. Dir. Sidney Lumet. Perf. Martin Balsom, John Fielder, Lee Cobb, E.G. Marshall, Jack Klugman, Edward Binns, Jack Warden, Henry Fonda, Joseph Sweeney, Ed Begley, George Voskovec, and Robert Webber. Orion-Nova Productions, 1957. DVD.CliffsNotes.com. Situational approaches to leadership. Retrieved September 8 2010 from:http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/topicArticleId-8944,articleId-8914.html

12 angry men movie to book analyisis

869 words - 3 pages The Fight For A LifeIn the classic story of ?12 Angry Men? originally directed by Sidney Lunnet and then by William Friedkin many characteristics shine through in both films. Both directors chose different actors, camera angles, and lighting, but the essence of the film stays the same. Each film also is greatly influenced by the time period in which they were made. Each time period is reflected in many ways throughout the story of ?12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

12 Angry Men

1475 words - 6 pages because the other answers didn’t make sense logically and only one possibility could exist. We also conformed because of a small time-constraint placed by Dr. Bradshaw. In our justice system, the courts are overburdened which places an insurmountable amount of pressure on judges, jury’s, and prosecutors due to time constraints. This perceived pressure could discompose a jury and create conformity. In addition to the overburdened system, the

12 Angry Men - 550 words

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a

12 Angry Men - 1445 words

1445 words - 6 pages 12 Angry Men is about 12 men who are the jury for an 18 year old accused murder. The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty. The 18 year old male is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade, in their home. The prosecutors have several eye witness testimonies, and all of the evidence that they could need to convict

"12 angry men."

721 words - 3 pages that they really need to stop and think logicly about the facts in the case. The black and white film is appropriate to issues of right and wrong, a murder trial, and the death penalty. The camera work, focusing on the jurors' faces and the attitudes they reveal, and small clues about the backgrounds of individual jurors create a large canvas of twelve angry men who will decide whether the accused will live or die. Small "sub-scenes" within the

"12 Angry Men" - Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages IntroductionOn a hot summer day, twelve men do their civic duty and begin deliberations over a minority young man's future. The young man is on trial for killing his father. His alibi is that he went to the movies. However, a knife, similar to a knife that he bought, is found protruding from the victim. The witnesses included an old man who claims that he heard the boy say "I'm going to kill you" only seconds before he heard a thud, which he

12 Angry Men

1438 words - 6 pages Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.      The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect

Analysis 12 angry men

3337 words - 13 pages WHY (meanings and audience effect). It's better to use fewer examples and analyse them well, than to give us a shopping list of every example in the text that proves your point.In Year 12 essays, quotes are less important than writing devices and features.You can use quotes anywhere in an essay but also ensure you concentrate on the various ways characters and events are presented. Obviously, metalanguage typical of both fiction and non-fiction

Similar Essays

12 Angry Men: Conflict In The Courtroom

791 words - 4 pages up until the end. Juror 12 was a fine illustration of a follower because at one point in the film he switched three times until he finally makes his final decision of not guilty. Throughout the majority of the discussion he had been doodling and not actually paying attention to what was being said, a sign that he didn't find the case to be important at all. In the beginning, Juror 2 seemed unsure of why he chose to vote guilty. He waits to hear

Leadership In 12 Angry Men Essay

1335 words - 5 pages shows the first quality of leadership vision. Vision can be defined as the leaders ability to know what is needed and how what is needed can be achieved (book). In the case of 12 Angry Men, Henry Fonda has a vision that he and the other jurors have the responsibility to consider the facts in the case and entertain the possibility that the young man may had not killed his father. An example of his vision can be found in his statement that “We're not

Ignorance In 12 Angry Men Essay

706 words - 3 pages eight is the main protagonist, he also a reserved with his thoughts, yet very strategic with them. He is the defender of the down trodden victim. He has a calm rational approach to everything and he reveals the gaps in the testimonies placed against the defendant. These examples would be; that the old man couldn’t have seen the boy run out of the house, as the old man had a limp and therefore could not make it to the door in time. The old lady

12 Angry Men Essay 1167 Words

1167 words - 5 pages In the movie "Twelve angry men" an eighteen year old is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all the jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not. The man who does not believe that the boy is guilty explains his views to the rest of the jurors and is ridiculed by the rest of the jurors. An old man later sees where