Forced Drug Testing Essay

1277 words - 5 pages

Should defendants be forced to take a drug test? Are pretrial programs effective in reducing failure to appear rates and pretrial crime? Are pretrial drug-testing programs ineffective because they are based on faulty assumptions? These three questions need to be answered for one to fully understand pretrial drug testing programs, and whether defendants should be forced to take a drug test or not. This paper will explain this issue and why defendants should not be forced to take drug tests.IneffectiveBased of Faulty AssumptionsRequiring pretrial drug testing has become a widely used practice; however, according to Neubauer, (2006) several studies find that at best pretrial drug testing programs have limited success. The reason for their limited success is that the programs are based on faulty assumptions, and are therefore ineffective. The first assumption is that pretrial drug testing programs reduce failure to appear rates, second is that they reduce pretrial misconduct.Reducing pretrial misconduct. According to Henry and Clark, (1992), pretrial drug-testing programs are based on two assumptions. The first assumption is that obtaining the knowledge that a defendant uses drugs through a drug test at the time of his or her arrest allows for the prediction of pretrial misconduct. Second, monitoring defendants' pretrial drug use will reduce the risk of pretrial misconduct.However, pretrial drug-testing programs do not help predict if a defendant will be rearrested while out on bail. According to Neubauer, (2006) the best "predictor" was the number of "prior arrests, and not drug use." For instance, repeat offenders who test negative for drug use are more likely to commit a crime while out on bail than a first-time offender who tested positive for drugs (Rhodes, Hyatt, and Scheiman, as cited in Neubauer, 2006).According to Henry and Clark, (1992) "an experimental design was used to test the effectiveness of pretrial drug monitoring in reducing pretrial misconduct" (p. 10). The study did not show any findings that could prove drug use predicted pretrial misconduct or reduced pretrial misconduct. "The lack of predictive power is not surprising from a statistical perspective because drug use is very common among arrestees and pretrial misconduct a relatively rare event" (Belenko, Mara-Drita, & McElroy, 1992, p. 577).Reducing failure to appear rates. In the same study, researchers compared failure to appear and recidivism rates. Once again the results for the study were mixed, and therefore, could not prove that drug tests reduce failure to appear rates (Henry and Clark, 1992). Furthermore, according to Visher, and Goldkemp and Jones, (as cited in Neubauer, 2006), "requiring defendants to participate in drug testing does not reduce failure-to-appear rates" (p 241).ExpensiveTesting Options and Their ExpensesBesides being ineffective, another reason defendants should not be forced to take drug tests is that it is too expensive. Because the programs are...

Find Another Essay On Forced Drug Testing

Drug Testing Is Illegal Essay

927 words - 4 pages besides the student, his parents, and the agency that is counseling him. Law enforcement does not get access to the records and there should be some way set up by the state to enforce that the test are private. This bill is a complete violation of these students’ fourth amendment rights. They are forced to take drug test without probable cause.      Drug testing should not be allowed for many reasons. One major reason why

Drug Testing in the Workplace Essay

3716 words - 15 pages Court Reporter).      Another issue of constitutionality is traced to the Fifth Amendment which deals with self-incrimination. This can be used as a legal argument since, and ??by being forced to take a drug test, this person can lose some privileges or rights, such as employment? (Bryan). Fifth Amendment questions generally can lead to questions dealing with the fairness of the testing procedure or due process. Once again, this applies mainly

Random Drug Testing is a Waste of Time

1601 words - 6 pages everything that once made that young person happy. The only thing that matters anymore is the drug, getting high, and getting higher. It is a horrible and tragic thing that destroys so many young lives. Some people think that in order to prevent these situations, the best solution is random drug testing. But this is not a reasonable solution whatsoever. Many more students are using and selling drugs as they roam around the campus, but will never be

The Controversy of Animal Testing

1302 words - 5 pages many animals are forced to live under. Animal testing is defined as the use of non-human animals in research and development projects ( All kinds of animals such as rabbits, dogs, mice, and guinea pigs are used to test the safety of food additives, industrial chemicals, cosmetics, drugs, household products and much more. Universities, pharmaceutical companies, and medical schools are examples of

Drug Testing is a Violation of the Fourth Amendment

3079 words - 12 pages Drug testing in the United States began with the explosive use of illegal drugs, in order to curb drug abuse. This began during the Vietnam War with drug use at a climax. In general, Drug testing is a way to detect illegal drug use and deter it, usually by Urinalysis. Drug testing in the United States violates a citizen's right to unreasonable search and seizure's along with jeopardizing one's freedom. Furthermore, Drug testing is not only an

Drug Testing

3244 words - 13 pages his, who had been accused of stealing. Adens refused because he had no knowledge of the crime. He was later threatened with his job due to the refusal, and given a urine test which he passed. Three months later Adens was forced to provide samples of his pubic hair for drug testing. He was never given an opportunity to sign off on the hair to identify it as his own, and much to his surprise it came back positive. Seven urinalysis tests had been

Drug Testing is Not a Violation of Individual Rights

2882 words - 12 pages Every day companies lose millions of dollars due to employee drug use. Athletes break world records with gargantuan strength, but not on a fair scale. Drugs ruin the lives of users and cause injury to those who must work with users. Detection by officials is necessary to curb this problem. When does the safety for others violate the rights of drug users? Drug testing, whether in the workplace or on the athletic field, is not a violation of

Drug testing in schools. The issue of drug testing in public schools. The postion is for drug testing and gives reasons and quotas from laws.

1354 words - 5 pages DRUG TESTING IN SCHOOLSThe issue of drug testing in public schools has become the most debated issue in the United States. This issue raises questions regarding the protection of the students' civil liberties and the moral obligations the schools have to parents, students and society. Schools are under pressure to do something about the drug use in the schools by the students. The school administrators are being forced to deal with both alcohol

Animal Testing

873 words - 3 pages makeup? Killing lab animals for such trivial reasons is morally no different from murder. If hundreds of people were forced to undergo these tests, there would be an outcry against it. Yet every day nothing is done to stop this from happening to defenseless creatures. Many people do not think there is anything wrong with testing animals because it is saving human lives; but there is no firm proof that animal testing has saved lives. It is assumed

Animal Testing

640 words - 3 pages Every year over 100 million animals die in the US; the cause for these deaths, animal testing. This injustice to animals involves testing products such as medical drugs or makeup, on poor imprisoned animals that don’t have the ability to stand for their own rights as most of us do. Animals used for testing are given products that may result in burning, poisoning, or death. These animals are forced to live in confined spaces where they wait until

Constitutional Rights in the Workplace- Patton-Fuller Community Hospital

1608 words - 6 pages , a positive drug test can put one out of a job or in a rehabilitation facility. Why is workplace drug testing legal? On September 15, 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed Executive Order 12564. The intent of this order was to create a drug-free Federal workplace. The order forced all Federal employees to stop using drugs while on or off duty. The Executive Order 12564 eventually helped create the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988. "The Drug-Free

Similar Essays

Drug Testing         My First Topic Paper Is Drug Testing. Drug

1007 words - 4 pages Drug Testing My first topic paper is drug testing. Drug testing is used in all fields of work, from a fast food employee to a professional athlete. Is it morally right for companies to give their employees random drug tests? I think so.This could be considered an invasion of privacy, but it is necessary for companies to be sure that everyone in the company is clean and in a safe working environment.In the profession of sports athletes get

Mandatory Drug Testing In High School Helps Prevent Drug Abuse

1048 words - 4 pages “The only way to have a drug free school is to follow the successful program of the military and workplace”. This is stated by Rep. John E. Peterson in 2005. In today’s volatile times, drug use is becoming more casual in high schools around the country. Many schools are having to face this struggle against drug use. Thus, I affirm that Resolved: Drug testing of high school extracurricular activity participants is justified.To aid

Drug Testing Essay

1177 words - 5 pages Against Drug Testing of Student AthletesNothing in the Constitution allows random urinalysis testing for students participating in interscholastic athletics. Such testing of students has not been proven beneficial to the students or the sports programs. More and more schools are testing student athletes for drug use, and so far, they are divided on the question of when and why schools may test student athletes for drugs. Laws vary from state to

Should People On Welfare Have To Have Drug Testing?

1389 words - 6 pages . benefits analysis. If money was no object, then testing is a clear cut decision. It will reduce the number of drug users because they will either be forced to go without assistance causing them to get a job or be on assistance and stop using drugs. Stopping the use of drugs should be the number one goal of welfare drug testing. Stopping the use of drugs leads a healthier lifestyle, which leads to a more healthy family and more healthy children.The