I negate the following resolved: Wealthy nations have an obligation to provide developmental assistance to other nations.
My value for today’s debate is utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham defined Utilitarianism as the doctrine that an action is right insofar as it promotes happiness, and that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guiding principle of conduct. I will prove that developmental assistance is harmful and immoral through offering assistance in the assistant's image.
VC- My value criterion to weigh my value will be maximizing sovereignty
Developmental assistance has proven in history harmful. Western society clearly shows this in the form of imperialism.
SUB A: Countries receiving aid lose their independence and sovereignty through imperialism
Africa has always been abused by imperialism from European nations in the 17th century and still today. Nobel Prize of economics winner Angus Deaton charted over the span of ten years that an influx of foreign aid lowered economic growth. And countries that receive less have a higher economic growth. Foreign aid is mostly brought upon countries with the most natural resources proving that wealthy nations seek the most benefit for themselves. He expressed these opinions most forcefully in a chapter of his recent book The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality, an excellent book, in which he argues that aid does not work, and that it can accelerate corruption and keep bad leaders in power.
SUB B: Development Assistance Has Unethical Motivations
International Geopolitics Play a Significant Role in Aid Allocation. NJG
Dreher, Axel. Eichenauer, Vera. Gehring, Kai. Langlotz, Sarah. Lohmann, Steffen."Does foreign aid affect growth?” The Center for Economic Policy Research. October 18th 2015. Accessed October 10th, 2017.
Figure 1 gives a hint of the political motives donors might have. The figure shows that countries of particular geostrategic importance – measured by their presence as temporary members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) (bolivia, egypt, japan, kazakhstan) – receive substantially more aid than other countries, and get almost twice the aid the same countries receive before they enter the UNSC. This relationship holds in more rigorous settings, highlighting the importance of vote-buying in international organizations as one important motive for giving ‘aid’
SUB C: OBLIGATORY DA CREATES ECONOMIC INSTABILITY
Griffin et al (Magdalen College, Oxford), “Foreign Assistance: Objectives and Consequences”. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Apr., 1970), pp. 313-327 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1152061lk
Even if the primary objective of foreign aid is not to improve the material well-being of the recipient nations, it is still worth examining the effects of capital imports on development. Our thesis is that not all help is helpful; not all aid assists. A...