This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Free Speech And Religion

1815 words - 7 pages

When Speech Challenges Religious Beliefs

Ever since the terrorist attacks of 9/11, many have taken great care in what they say. In one instance, a political science professor, Kenneth Hearlson, of Orange Coast Community College in California, urged his classroom to discuss the nature of Islam and its relationship to September 11. He posed the valid question of how Muslims and Islamic states could condemn the terrorist attacks on America and not the suicide bombers in Israel. It turned into a high-spirited discussion, in which some Muslim students took exception and complained to the dean. As a result, the College suspended professor Kenneth Hearlson (NOW with Bill Moyers at http://www.pbs.org).

        In a free and democratic society that values our freedom of speech and religion, what are we to do when the two come into conflict? Should we limit free speech when it challenges, criticizes, mocks, or scorns our religious beliefs?

        I will argue that Canadians do have the right to speak openly and freely with respect to other Canadian’s religious views and beliefs – even if it is to scorn, mock, or criticize. The only legal limit to free speech would be the incitement of serious injury to the state and its citizens. The government’s role is to look after our civil interests, which includes our physical safety.

        The freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression is protected and enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Section 2a). This includes speech that is judged by others as offensive. People should be able to discuss the merits or demerits of a religion because it is a measure of opposing faiths and beliefs, not true and false. To prohibit religious debate allows ignorance to flourish. It prevents all participants from achieving a better understanding. Furthermore, the organizational nature of a religion actually allows for others to criticize their views because the religion can only have jurisdiction over its own members.

        John Locke, in A Letter Concerning Toleration, defined the civil interests of government as, “…life, liberty, health, and indolency of body; and the possession of outward things, such as money, lands, houses, furniture, and the like” (1947). Therefore, the government has a right to interfere in our freedom of speech and religion if it interferes with the civil interests our society has to offer. In this case, the incitement of serious violence to the state and its people can justify silencing speech. Any speech short of this measure is best remedied through more speech.

        In sections of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it conveys our right to freedom of conscience and religion (Section 2a) and freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression (Section 2b). The overwhelming message is that as Canadians, we are free to think and say pretty much anything we want. The Charter gives Canadians, “…equal protection...

Find Another Essay On Free Speech And Religion

Interaction of Free Speech and Right to Privacy

2096 words - 9 pages How do free speech and privacy rights interact with each other in a country? Where does the boundary lie between free speech and privacy? The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states that: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the

Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition

918 words - 4 pages tell we need our freedom of expression daily! The Government is supposed to let people express themselves without constraint. The 1st Amendment says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances

This is a cause and effect essay explaining how education, free speech, and contraception contribute to a free society

1319 words - 5 pages dispense valuable information about protected sex. In the United States, we have a constitutionally protected right to discuss anything openly.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-The First Amendment to the

Free Will and Religion in the Aeneid and Plato - Seminar, Bard - Essay

979 words - 4 pages 1 Quinn Henegar John Adams Seminar 25 November 2017 Free Will and Religion Fate and free will plays a big role in a lot of religious texts. That’s because, in a way, religion can strip a person of their free will. In ​The Aeneid ​the Gods determine the humans’ fate. More specifically, seems to be calling all the shots. With Jupiter determining the humans fate, it takes away their free will because whenever they attempt to make their own

awareness of malaysian and chinese regarding issue of free of speech

1505 words - 7 pages Malaysians. Citizens of Malaysia back in the olden days when they had just gained their independence, did not delight in much freedom of speech or simply known as free speech. They are much restricted by the act of the law and one of that is the Sedition Act 1948 which was introduced and left by last colonizer of Malaya back then. Bounded by the act that enacted tendency to be seditious can actually put one guilty according to the Sedition Act

Social Media, Free Speech and the Judicial Legacy of the Tinker Case

1467 words - 6 pages student’s freedom of speech and a school’s responsibility to provide an appropriate learning environment. Over 40 years ago the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that defined student free speech rights within the framework of the public schools, but the Tinker decision, or any of United States Supreme Court’s other student free speech rulings, could not anticipate the impact of student off-campus use of the Internet would have

Behind the Stop Online Piracy Act Bill (SOPA): Copyright, Censorhip, and Free Speech

1700 words - 7 pages Behind SOPA: Copyright, Censorship and Free speech At the beginning of 2012, a series of coordinated protests occurred online and offline against Stop Online Piracy Act Bill (SOPA) that expands U.S. law enforcement’s ability to combat online copyright infringement. As this protest involved many influential websites like Google and Wikipedia, it certainly draws national attention on SOPA. Whether censorship should be used online against online

Propaganda in the Online Free Speech Campaign, Propaganda and Mass Communication

5227 words - 21 pages support for their cause, and a small number of these organizations claim this fight as their only cause. Some of these organizations are broad based civil liberties groups, some fight for freedom of speech based on the first amendment, and other groups favor the lowering of laws involving the use of encrypted data on computers. All of these groups, however, speak out for free speech on the Internet, and all of these groups have utilized the

Constitutional Issues and the Scope and Character of the U.S. Government: Free Speech - Ashford University POL 303 - Research Paper

3078 words - 13 pages its own voting procedures” (vocabulary.com). The First Amendment of the Constitution protects the right to freedom of expression and religion from government interference. “It prohibits any laws that establish a national religion, impede the free exercise of religion, abridge the freedom of speech, infringe upon the freedom of press, interfere with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibit citizens from petitioning for a governmental redress of

Limits of free speech and expulsion of a student from Brown University. Discussion on why it happend and should he be expelled?

811 words - 3 pages Did Hann Deserve this Punishment?The limits of free speech have always been a subject of argument between colleges and universities. It shows itself once more in the case of Doug Hann, when he started throwing out abusive, racial and religious words at black and Jewish people. This wasn't the first time that Mr. Hann did this. But surely, this was the incident that cost him to lose his educational future and accordingly he expelled from Brown

America, Land of the free. Discusses what would happen if it didn't have the freedom of press, and the freedom of speech

807 words - 3 pages America, land of the free. America, a country based in many ways on the freedom of press, and the freedom of speech. But what would happen to this great country, tis of thee, if these precious rights had ceased to exist? America, the land of liberty and home of the brave, would hold a great stock of uninformed and uneducated community, ready to rise up to anarchy at any moment; a crowd of undiverse and ununified people; and a population of souls

Similar Essays

Free Speech And Pornography

638 words - 3 pages rights, they did not rule on the issue of Fifth Amendment rights violations. Both constitutional and criminal issues were being addressed in this appeal. Constitutional Provisions at Issue The Constitutional issue that was addressed was whether the CDA violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech (Reno, 1997). The court found that the CDA did infringe upon the freedom of speech protection afforded in the First Amendment. The CDA was an

Free Speech And National Security

1185 words - 5 pages first amendment, free speech clause: should someone be able to put up very offensive and anti-Muslim images near a mosque? Associated press. "Anti-Muslim images are protected speech, Minn. officials say." Web. A recent article states that superbowl-style ads could soon be coming to your TV. This means that independent corporations could advertise for a political candidate on TV. Now, the question here is should corporations be able to

First Amendment And Free Speech

1976 words - 8 pages This paper will examine the first amendment’s right to free speech based on three different Supreme Court cases and how there are varying examples of free speech. In the case of Snyder v. Phelps, Snyder sued Phelps, the Westboro Baptist Church, for intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy by intrusion upon seclusion, and conspiracy because the church set-up protest outside of his military son’s funeral service (Chen et

Oliver Wendell Holmes And Free Speech

3577 words - 14 pages Close analysis of Oliver Wendell Holmes’ approach to the 1st Amendment freedoms of speech and press reveals a changing conclusion. The amendment that Holmes is associated with reads as such, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a