Free Trade Essay

1687 words - 7 pages

Free trade can be defined as the free access of the market by individuals without any restriction or any trade barriers that can obstruct the trade process such as taxes, tariffs and import quotas. Free trade in its own way unites and brings people together. Most individuals love the concept of free trade because it gives them the ability to move freely and interact in the market. The whole idea of free trade is that it lowers the price for goods and services by promoting competition. Domestic producers will no longer be able to rely on government law and other forms of assistance, including quotas which essentially force citizens to buy from them. The producers will have to enter the market and strive into to obtain profit.
Free trade was first observed by Adam smith in 1776. “These artificial constraints to free trade are detrimental to a society” (Adam Smith). Until his book was published so many people had different skeptic about free trade. As a result of Adam Smith's book titled Wealth of Nations, free trade achieved an intellectual and rational status supreme to any other principle in the field of economics.
Another economist Douglas Irwin wrote a book titled “Against the Tide”. The book is an Intellectual History of Free Trade; it is an interesting, educational account of how free trade appeared and of how the concept of free trade has coped with two centuries of attacks and criticism.
The behavior of an economy is reflected in the behavior or nature of the individuals and firms that make up the economy. So by studying how the individuals and firms act we can be able to understand the economy. We begin our study of free trade by understanding the four principles of individual decision making.
Individual’s make their decisions by trading off one goal against another. A good example of trading off is how a buyer allocates his time when buying goods. He can either buy rice or beans or cassava and so much more and for every hour he spends buying rice he gives up an hour he could have used to buy beans or cassava. “Trade off can simply be defined as giving up something that you like to get something that you like” (Principle of microeconomics).
The second principle of how people make decisions is by realizing that the cost of something is what you give up to get it. Due to the fact that people generally face trade-offs, decision making requires comparing the costs and benefits analysis of other alternative courses of action. When making decision you must have an opportunity cost which is what you give up to obtain something else.
The third principle of how people make decisions is that rational people think at the margin. Individuals and firms can make better decisions by thinking at the margin and by comparing the marginal benefits with the associated marginal costs of a decision. “A rational decision-maker takes action if and only if the marginal benefit of the action exceeds the marginal cost” (Principles of microeconomics).

Find Another Essay On Free Trade

Free Trade Essay

972 words - 4 pages Running head: FREE TRADE Free Trade Wheat_boy Clarion University When discussing world trade issues many concepts and ideas are debated among professional economists. In every economists head they have their own idea on how the concept of free trade affects the world?s economy and society. Bickering amongst each other they try to come up with contracts and regulations that will help improve world trade. They all have goals set that they will

Free Trade Vs Fair Trade Essay

2369 words - 9 pages Introduction Adam Smith, author of The Wealth of Nations, shows support for free trade and emphasises it as a trade policy which ought to be adopted. Krugman and Obstfeld back Smith's support by stating that the efficiency of trade is increased by free trade and accumulates the national income of countries. Free trade is a theory which suggests that each nation benefits in specialising in an economic activity from which it gains absolute

Is Free Trade Passé?

1159 words - 5 pages “Free trade is not passé, but is an idea that has irretrievably lost its innocence” (Krugman, 1987, p.132). In his article, Is Free Trade Passé, Paul Krugman writes that the classical trade theory has been replaced with a new trade theory. The classical trade theory is based on constant returns to scale and perfect competition, is driven by comparative advantage, and endorses free trade. This classical theory emphasized the idea

Is Free Trade Passé?

1148 words - 5 pages The journal article “Is Free Trade Passé?” (Krugman, 1987) makes the case that the traditional free trade approach to international economics is more in doubt today than at any time since publication of Ricardo’s On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1821) that originally espoused the philosophy of free trade. Krugman (1987) argues that comparative advantage based on constant returns and perfect competition models have given way

Imperialism and Free Trade

2094 words - 8 pages Imperialism and Free Trade Like many terms used with the study of empire, the term Imperialism is considerably loaded, with many negative connotations. Modern political understanding of the word often suggests an illegitimate desire to extend one’s power or authority for reasons of self-advantage, be it national or individual. The British Empire is often considered to be imperialistic, largely due to its heavy

Is Free Trade Desirable?

1622 words - 6 pages The free trade debate has been a long and very much politicized one since its conception, with people split up into camps such as "Economic Liberalists" and "Neo-Mercantilists". Whether or not to impose a free trade system between countries has caused much fear and confusion within the public. Will free trade be beneficial to all or will it cause unemployment in developed countries? Will it cause entire domestic industries to crumble under the

Free Trade Agreement (FTA)

1093 words - 4 pages FTA continuously increases, even though the WTO exists? First of all, the USA adhered a negative position in FTA, but after 90’ they come turned to positive position. After the USA changed their position they propelled free trade agreement contracting. The USA is the center country of the world economy so the changing their position is enough to call the ripple effect to other countries. The second, the WTO is the multilateral trade

Free Trade vs Protectionism

3984 words - 16 pages Free Trade vs Protectionism One of the greatest international economic debates of all time has been the issue of free trade versus protectionism. Proponents of free trade believe in opening the global market, with as few restrictions on trade as possible. Proponents of protectionism believe in concentrating on the welfare of the domestic economy by limiting the open-market policy of the United States. However, what effects does this

Free Trade Agreement

2785 words - 11 pages IntroductionOne of the very first concerns of the recent international business participants has been stressed in the context of Free Trade Agreement (FTA) since more and more countries pursue it in the regional or multilateral trade initiatives with large benefits derived from it.Free trade is a trade between nations where the government exerts minimal influence on the exporting and importing decisions or a firm or individual (Mahoney, Trigg

Australia and Free trade

2571 words - 10 pages 1980's, and the negotiation of free trade agreements (FTAs), or more precisely, preferential trade agreements (PTAs). FTAs are multilateral in nature, encompassing majority of global nations. Such agreements are mediated through the World Trade Organization and negotiated at the Doha round. Current negotiations have been broken down since 2008, when constituents were unable to reach a compromise on agricultural trade-barriers. PTAs are distinct

Globalisation and free trade.

2332 words - 9 pages Task 1 Comparative AdvantageThe basic model of comparative advantage is a static analysis of the production possibility frontier (PPF) curves of two countries that produce two goods. It measures the increase in output due to specialisation and trade. The model implies that free trade will benefit both countries. In the global economy, comparative advantage is dynamic and involves many countries and many products; therefore it is difficult to

Similar Essays

Free Trade Essay

1084 words - 4 pages Free trade is a part of the geopolitical landscape today, but that was not always the case. In terms of free trade, the practice of reciprocal non-interference had been followed in the second period between 1934 and 1990, but there had also been very different results ("Civil," 1999). The period witnessed an expansion in terms of the scope of civil society, and a growing labor movement had become increasingly involved in the debate; this

Free Trade Essay

1380 words - 6 pages What is free trade? Many American’s have a broad and sometimes-false idea of what free trade actually is. Free trade “refers to the economic philosophy and practice of reducing barriers such as tariffs, taxes, subsidies and quotas so that raw materials, goods and services can move unhampered across national borders.” (68) Various options have arisen about whether or not free trade benefits developing counties or not. I believe that free trade is

Free Trade Essay

1665 words - 7 pages cost added to it from the purchase. That is what the ships crew is getting ready to unload, but is this the future of international trade?Free trade is defined as trade between two separate entities, usually countries, with little to no governmental interference and regulations. Also called opening trade, would allow all nations to prosper and develop fairly and equitably (Free Trade 1). The idea of free trade is still just a dream. It is

Free Trade? Essay

681 words - 3 pages In an economic age in which speedy transactions of imports and exports are essential, is free trade a necessity for aiding worldwide economic development? At least John F. Kennedy thought so, he being the initiator of removing tariffs and other limitations on U.S. imports. His hypothesis was that by doing that, other nations would follow America’s example and leadership. However, that never happened because the other nations were more concerned