Functionalism Essay

1876 words - 8 pages

According to Ned Block, Functionalism is concerned with finding the answer to the question (“what are mental states?”), ("What are mental states?”) One of the features of the functionalism is that it sees each form of mental state as being a state which includes the tendency to behave in particular ways in addition to possessing particular mental states.
Functionalists are usually preoccupied with the individuation of mental states, partly on the basis of causal relations to other mental states. As Shoemaker explains, in the 1975 work, functionalism, from the philosophy of mind view is the conviction that psychological or mental terms can be done away to a certain extent. Functionalists have been known to treat terms related to mental states as a mental state functional characterization which differs from input and output terms. Therefore in a (“simplified Turing –machine version of the theory,”) mental states are associated with the states of the Turing-machine, which own on their own are clearly defined by a machine table which mentions outputs and outputs that are explored nonmentalistically. Additionally functionalism empathizes that characterization of mental states ought to include descriptions of outputs and inputs in both its non-machine and machine versions.
The variation between Psychofunctionalism and Functionalism brings forth a difference in specifying outputs and inputs. Functionalists are restricted to specification of outputs and inputs that constitutes common-sense knowledge; Psychofunctionalists are not bound by such restrictions. Whereas both sides lay emphasis on physical specification outputs and inputs, Functionalists are keen on classifications that are externally observable. Psychofunctionalists, have the alternative to specify outputs and inputs in terms of internal parameters.
Problem of the inputs and the outputs
The difference between Psychofunctionalism and Functionalism generates a distinction in the manner of specifying the inputs as well as outputs. Functionalists tend to be restricted to inputs’ specification, as well as the outputs which are plausibly an integral of common-sense capacity (knowledge); Psychofunctionalists, however, are not under such restriction. Even if both the Functionalists and Psychofunctionalism emphasize on physical, or nonmental-specification over inputs and outputs, the requirement by Functionalists remains the externally observable classifications, for example, inputs whose characteristics assume the terms of the present objects within the organisms vicinity, expressed in body parts’ movements. On the other hand, Psychofunctionalists are at liberty to present a specification between inputs and outputs, assuming the internal parameters’ terms; for example, signals in input, as well as output neurons.
One problem of the input and output is that it is depended on the premise that outputs and inputs can be distinguished by neural impulse descriptions. The...

Find Another Essay On Functionalism

Structural-functionalism Essay

964 words - 4 pages The focus on how social structures determine, and are effective in maintaining the equilibrium is functionalism or structural-functionalism, which is the theorizing of Durkheim and Parsons (Dillon, book, 179). What this means is that we need to look at the structures effectiveness of social structures and make sure that it is at a satisfying state of equilibrium. An example of this would be the human body, we have many different organs and they

Functionalism Vs. Physicalism Essay

524 words - 3 pages While acquiring knowledge on the topics of Functionalism andPhysicalism, I ran across many disagreement between the two. Interestingly,those disagreements gave me an impression of different sides arguing with theirown support from their own theories. As if an Arabian and a Roman were arguingabout whether the number eleven is an 'Arabic' number or a 'Roman' number.Though, as I read more and more of the readings (especially Putnam's), I startedto

Structuralism and Functionalism

525 words - 2 pages One could say that Titchener is seen as the father of structuralism. Thought he gives great credit to Wundt, he altered Wundts theory extensively resulting in a new theory. Structuralism, in short, is the "system of psychology, which dealt with conscious experience as a dependant on experiencing persons" (Schultz, 2004, p509). This varies greatly from the functionalism approach that's focus is on the mind and how it adapts with its

Functionalism vs Conflict Theory

1138 words - 5 pages The theory of functionalism and conflict theory differ in several ways. They focus on different values, assume different things about society and differ in their explanations of power. Functionalism is defined as ?the analysis of social and cultural phenomena in terms of the functions they perform in a sociocultural system.In functionalism society is conceived as a system of interrelated parts in which no part can be understood in isolation from

Functionalism Theory of Education

1389 words - 6 pages There are three main theoretical perspectives (or theories) that represent the views of sociologist and educators, these views are the conflict perspective, symbolic interactions, and functionalism. Although all of these theories are important to education and society, I have chosen to focus my research or theoretical perspective on functionalism also including the effects functionalism and education. The Functionalist perspective is one of

A Response to Functionalism

2380 words - 10 pages A Response to Functionalism Stephen Priest in Theories of Mind Chapter 5 describes functionalism as 'the theory that being in a mental state is being in a functional state' and adds that 'functionalism is, in a sense, an attempt to bypass the mind-body problem'. What does this definition really mean? An analogy might clarify the situation. Suppose a young child were to ask me what a saucepan was and in reply I said that it is a means

Functionalism and Marxism

2388 words - 10 pages In the history of anthropology and sociology, there have been many different social theories. Often these theories are influential for a period of time and then lose popularity once a new, more seductive theory is established. Marxism and functionalism are two examples of social theories that made a grand impact on the anthropological and sociological fields, but have since faded from the forefront. Marxism was established by Karl Marx in the

Prostitution and Functionalism

695 words - 3 pages Prostitution and Functionalism Works Cited Not Included Throughout America and the entire world, prostitution flourishes. Prostitution is another never ending war like abortion, which society feels is immoral. This immorality leads functionalists, who apply functionalism to this social problem, on a chase to figure out why prostitution is what it is today. Functionalism is the best theory for looking at prostitution. It allows us to see

The Plausibility of Analytic Functionalism

2109 words - 8 pages The tenets of analytic functionalism worked well at attempting to align the philosophies of behaviorism and the identity theory, and though there are many objections to the theory’s method of formulaic definition of mental states, I find that analytic functionalism is a plausible theory that describes the mind. I find that in determining a means in which to define mental states, analytic functionalism demonstrates an ontological method in which

Structuralism and Functionalism of Psychology

1376 words - 6 pages than engaging themselves in research. It was at this period when several schools of thoughts emerged to explain behavior, cognition, and consciousness. In this paper, two of the earliest school of thoughts will be discussed. These are Structuralism and Functionalism. These two will be compared and contrasted. Structuralism and Functionalism One of the earliest schools of thought in psychology was structuralism. It was founded by Edward B

structural functionalism - Sociology - Research Assignment

644 words - 3 pages · What is structural functionalism? In what ways is poverty functional for society? Do you agree? Structural functionalism is the idea of society being a complex system that work together to promote unity and stability. In the paper the major theoretical perspectives in sociology the writer focuses on the institutions being the "structures" in structural functionalism, playing an important role in the stability and survival of society

Similar Essays

Functionalism Essay

2248 words - 9 pages Functionalism is a materialist stance in the philosophy of mind that argues that mental states are purely functional, and thus categorized by their input and output associations and causes, rather than by the physical makeup that constitutes its parts. In this manner, functionalism argues that as long as something operates as a conscious entity, then it is conscious. Block describes functionalism, discusses its inherent dilemmas, and then

Functionalism Essay

1358 words - 5 pages Theories have been composed and exposed by various philosophers to explain their understanding about the mind. Dualism, Behaviorism and Identity Theory are well-known theories supported by well-written explanations. A modern theory, Functionalism has been proposed that provides great insight to the main problem philosophers deal with, the mind/body problem. Functionalism was developed as a combination of the Behaviorist theory and the

Functionalism Essay

1343 words - 5 pages Theories have been composed and exposed by various philosophers to clarify their reasoning about the mind. Dualism, Behaviorism, and Identity Theory, are well-known theories supported by well-written explanations. A modern theory, Functionalism provides ample insight to the main problem philosophers deal with, the mind/body problem. Functionalism was developed as a combination of the Behaviorist theory and the Identity theory. Behaviorism

Fodor's Functionalism Essay

1307 words - 5 pages Fodor's Functionalism Fodor begins his article on the mind-body problem with a review of the current theories of dualism and materialism. According to dualism, the mind and body are two separate entities with the body being physical and the mind being nonphysical. If this is the case, though, then there can be no interaction between the two. The mind could not influence anything physical without violating the laws of physics. The materialist