This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Gay V Straight, Right V Wrong!

1414 words - 6 pages

As whole The United States of American has came along way from the Revolutionary War, The Civil War, Slavery, Women Rights, Great Depressions, and Civil Rights. America is the land of free, we were founded on a basis that everyone would be treated equally because we understood that oppression and suppression were by all mean not what a society should be based off. America knows as a whole when something is not right, we fight to change it. Although things may not have drastic changes we the people have always been known to fight for what is right and fair. Now when it comes to the same- Sex Marriage debate it is basically Americas knew Racism and instead of being black or white, it has turned into gay vs. straight. Once again what is right or what is wrong.
“ Same sex marriage – when two people of the same sex who live together as a family.” The legal aspect of same marriages have been hotly debated. “
The Same-Sex Marriage debate has heated up government rulings for centuries. Since most countries were created with religious beliefs the idea of Same-Sex Marriage and homosexuality was a topic that was utterly shunned and overlooked. The Supreme Court has left a lot of unanswered questions with this debate until recently. In the past it was unclear unto were the actual law stood in respect to the right to engage in homosexual conduct. Living in the 21st century with a higher population that is homosexual, the push for marriage equality has been at an uproar. In recent times on August 19, 2013 was the first time that modern laws for same sex marriage were actually enacted. They were enacted in 15 different countries (Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, Iceland, Uruguay, Denmark, etc.). In America there are 16 states who allow gay marriage, and there are 33 states who ban same sex marriage. Some of the states with the largest populations such as California and New York are amongst these sixteen states, while Massachusetts was the first to legalize gay marriage in November of 2003.
The main argument for being against same sex marriage comes into play with religion, Leviticus 20:13
"If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense." (NLT). Homosexuality has always been a practice that was looked down upon in society. This nation was built on religious freedoms but almost all religious practices do not agree with this behavior. So that trickles down into our government leaders and how they were brought up and taught which persuades how bills are past based on beliefs. If we go into technical definitions marriage was originally a religious practice, a ceremony to unify man and women. Until recently it became a legal aspect due to people needing marriage licenses and etc. “Marriage- the union of man and women, typically recognized by law, they become husband and...

Find Another Essay On Gay v Straight, Right v Wrong!

An Analysis of Collin v Smith; Nazi's right to march in Jewish community is upheld as free speech

868 words - 3 pages "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech" (US Constitution, Amendment 1) Once in a while, a case comes along that forces us to redefine our views about what "freedom of speech"(Amendment 1) truly means. The case of Collin v Smith is a classic example. In 1977-78, the American Nazi party requested permission to march in the village of Skokie, Illinois, a village predominantly populated by Jews, many of whom were Nazi camp

Gay Marriage in America Essay

2069 words - 9 pages to the Constitution, everyone is equal. That means everyone, whether gay or straight has the right to equal opportunities and privileges such as marriage. If straight couples can receive benefits than constitutionally gay couples should be able to receive those same benefits. Gay couples face discrimination and a plethora of prejudice, including the assumption that they are all promiscuous and not capable of sustaining a committed relationship

Homosexuality and the Right to Form a Family

1158 words - 5 pages infertile, the elderly, the impotent and those with no wish to procreate” (570). At the same time, even though it is biologically impossible for a gay couple to procreate, adoption remains as a possibility to form a fully functional family. Pollitt also pointed out, when analyzing straight marriage through history it is possible for someone to realize that a gay marriage is a more romantic and happier union (Pollitt 571). Additionally, the

Same Sex aMarriage

5157 words - 21 pages protected by the Constitutional commitment to liberty and equal opportunity (ProCon.org, 2011). The United States Supreme Court declared in 1974's Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur that the freedom of personal choice regarding decisions such as marriage and family are liberties that are protected by the Due Process Clause (ProCon.org, 2011). A second reason supporters use is that legalizing gay marriage would make it easier for same-sex

Gay Marriage: Between Man and Woman or Love and Love?

958 words - 4 pages monogamy “unnatural.” (Douthat) Despite opposition, I am convinced that the definition of marriage cannot be based upon what’s in the dictionary or bible and the truth behind marriage doesn’t have to be between a man and a woman but between love and love. Two adults whether they are gay, lesbian, or straight, should have the right to make the personal decision of whether they will commit themselves to each other or not. It is clear that gay

The Universal Right to Family

2048 words - 8 pages forms for ones’ children in an emergency, the right to inherit property after death, the right to sign a school permission slip, and the right to custody and visitation in cases of two parents separating (Wolfson). These are rights so fundamental that no straight person probably thinks about them, but many gay families need to use a family lawyer to update wills, set up special trusts, and create durable powers of attorney in order to avoid

"Homosexuality as a Deviance" The view that homosexuality is deviant allows society to discriminate against certain people

1599 words - 6 pages , employment, membership into organizations, and engaging in violence against homosexuals. Heterosexuals also express homophobia by avoiding acts that would cause people to think they were gay. It affects men the most like this because it hinders male friendships. Men do not want to get too close to their male friends, or express emotions because they might be considered gay. Homophobia restricts the lives of both gay and straight people.Laws against

The Controversy Ocer Gay Marriage

1608 words - 7 pages Supreme Court declared marriage to be "of fundamental importance to all individuals” (Zablocki v. Redhail 1978). The court also described marriage as "one of the basic civil rights of man" and "the most important relation in life” (International Lesbian and Gay Association, p1, 2008). The court also noted that "the right to marry is part of the fundamental right to privacy" in the U.S. Constitution” (Ed. Kate Burns, 2005). When my aunt came out as

Artistotle's use of distributive, corrective, and reciprocal justice,

2251 words - 9 pages their race, sexual orientation, religion, or gender should have equal rights under the law. Fear, ignorance, and religion are not reasons to condemn homosexuals the right to marry. Most religions do not condemn homosexuality, the verses of the bible of any religion is typically misinterpreted and not challenged. It is not wrong to love another person. Everyone should embrace a society that is equal, and just for everyone.Same Sex Marriage Should

We Must Legalize Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transsexual Marriage

1611 words - 6 pages In the state of Oklahoma, there are political, social, and legal barriers that restrict gay marriage within the state boundaries. In pursuing the “American Dream”, gay marriage is a natural right given to every human living his or her life in this country. Natural, inalienable, rights provide a way of life in which eternal love is an example of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I believe that Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, and

Gay marriages: Should it be legal?

2664 words - 11 pages license, but have been denied because they were gay. Loving v. Virginia was case when the Supreme Court's decision was declared as "The freedom to marry as long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men." Gays looked as this as a promise to be able to enjoy their personal rights (Lahey 16). The Loving decision gave hope to the gay community in guarantees to equality. Two early

Similar Essays

Lawrence V. Texas And The History Of Gay Rights

3139 words - 13 pages entered the foray on the wrong side of history, supporting the legality of anti-sodomy laws and sending a clear message to the public that the gay community would find no friends on the court. That is, until 2003 with Lawrence v. Texas, where the Supreme Court acted with a dynamic court view by overruling Bowers v. Hardwick and striking down decades of anti-sodomy law. The Supreme Court first ruled on the issue of gay rights with Bowers v. Hardwick

The Right To Freedom Of Expression: R. V. Keegstra

3315 words - 13 pages of R. v. Keegstra to argue that the rights of individuals and groups to be afforded the right to respect and dignity outweigh any claim to freedom of expression. R v. Keegstra: s. 2 (b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms versus s. 319 (2) of the Criminal Code The case, R. v. Keegstra, constructs a framework concerning whether the freedom of expression should be upheld in a democratic society, even when it is used to perpetuate deliberate

Robert Bork's "The Right Of Privacy". An Examination Of The Landmark Case Griswald V. Conneticut

877 words - 4 pages Robert Bork's The Right of Privacy examined the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut. Bork's 'originalist' view proclaimed that Justice Douglas erroneously interpreted the right of privacy from the Constitution. The originalist view is that judges must strictly adhere to the language of the Constitution, thus people do not have a general right to privacy because it was never actually written into the Constitution. This view severely restricts

The Right To Appointed Counsel In Decisions Of The United States Supreme Court Prior To Miranda V. Arizona (1966)

1804 words - 7 pages The right to appointed counsel in decisions of the United States Supreme Court prior to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) From the Judiciary Act to incorporation doctrine In the landmark decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) the US Supreme Court stated in the name of Chief Justice Earl Warren that “…He [accused] has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning