This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

General Motors And Chrysler Merger Essay

2633 words - 11 pages

Executive SummaryHuman Resource Management is not still viewed as a critical strategy in merging companies, especially at the early stages of the process. This is really strange as the cultural incompatibility between the two merging companies causes a lot of obstacles and problems. I believe that Human Resource departments can significantly influence the most. Nevertheless, GM and Chrysler need to take account certain factors in their successful merger strategies.Nowadays, all companies should constantly adjust and restructure to survive and grow in today's progressively competitive economic environment. Obviously there is no exception for GM and Chrysler. Many companies follow the Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) process as the radical forms of constant restructuring. However, lack of attention to the human dimensions may prevent success and even may lead to complete failure.GM and Chrysler are considering Merger and acquisition as fast and efficient way to strengthen and maintain their position in the market place. Yet their success is by no means guaranteed.The following report offers some recommendations on how human resource management can be used to assure their success, and thereby reduce the numerous social costs associated with their failure.Considering the regulations of ILO (International Labour Organization), I have analyzed a three-stage model of mergers and acquisitions for GM and Chrysler.The three-Stage Model shows that HRM is the main issue on the success or failure of GM and Chrysler merger, especially at the combination or implementation stages; however; statistics show that only 15 per cent of mergers and acquisitions achieve their objectives.At this following report, I am trying to express a systematic, people-oriented approach for effectively doing mergers and acquisitions, from beginning to integration and post-integration.Considering that the job loss has a strong negative impact on employees and society, companies that are successful and inventive in mergers and acquisitions can create strong social values for their employees and the society. This successively, can lead to job growth over time and provide an edge for the company over the others competitors.Gunther believes that today there are a lot of attention to the legal, financial, and operational elements of mergers and acquisitions. However, executives who have been through the merger process now recognize that in today's economy, the human resource management is the real key to maximizing the value of a deal.Why GM and Chrysler should Merge together?This is a good question which should be asked before these two huge car manufacturing companies should ask themselves before involving into a very risky, time consuming and difficult operation. Here, I have summarized a list of good reasons for GM and Chrysler's amalgamation:Market dominance; economies of scale.Risk spreading, cost cuttingGlobal reach.SurvivalAcquisition of cashBigger asset base to leverage...

Find Another Essay On General Motors and Chrysler Merger

The Rise and Fall of General Motors Company

1592 words - 7 pages Could “Old” GM bring down “New” GM with the recent recall news? Is the “Cinderella” story about the turnaround all a “fairy tale?” Are the poor workmanship practices of “Old GM” haunting “New GM?” For want of a $0.57 switch will GM’s Kingdom be lost? Recently in the news there has been an alarming fact about General Motors automobile products that have caused a loss of property and more importantly loss of lives, while most admit a simple design

Merger of Daimler-Benz and Chrysler Corp. How a merger of two companies affect and is affected by the global market

1297 words - 5 pages , Maybach, smart and Setra. The second one Chrysler Corp. is a maker of American car brands such as Chrysler, Jeep, Pontiac, Dodge and trucks Freightliner, Western Star, and Sterling. The merger of Chrysler and Daimler-Benz is the biggest between two enterprises in industrial history. Promising a world's most profitable carmaker by Daimler Benz CEOJuergen E. Schrempp, the merger occurred in 1998. The reality wasn't as he thought. It wasn't that

The General Motors and Fisher Body Case Study by Benjamin Klein, Robert Crawford, and Arman Alchian

1426 words - 6 pages The General Motors & Fisher body Case Study The first paper referring to the case study was written by Benjamin Klein, Robert Crawford, and Arman Alchian, "Vertical integration, appropriable rents and the competitive contracting process." (Klein et al, 1978). It discusses "possibility of post contractual opportunistic behaviour" (Klein et al., 1978 p297) and is a great example of vertical integration used to relieve a hold up in the face of

The primary internal and external influence on the General Motors Corporation

3834 words - 15 pages automaker giants in the United States. They are the General Motors, Ford, and Daimler Chrysler. They compete fierce in the United States and in global market. In the Europe, there are strong competitors such as BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Peugeot etc. In the 1970s, with the raising of oil price, some Japanese automakers gradually seized the automobile market shares. The low cost and energy saving cars, such as Toyota, Honda and so on became world

Describe the differences in production methods of Toyota (lean) and General motors (mass) and how the function of managers has changed

1752 words - 7 pages The differences between these two production systems are very clear, in fact it can be said that they are the total opposite of each other in terms of their approach to, and methods of, production.One of several aspects of the Toyota production system that differ from The GM system is that Toyota puts a flow into the manufacturing process, while GM has lathes located in the lathe area, milling machines in the milling area Toyota places a lathe

How Chrysler handled the 2007 recession in regard to their international strategies

1139 words - 5 pages addition, Chrysler also had heavy liabilities, and it made Chrysler’s financial situation worse. In order to save itself, Chrysler was attempting to seek restructure opportunities. In August and October 2008, Chrysler negotiated with Nissan and General Motors respectively. However, as the poor performance of General Motors in the crisis, the negotiation didn’t proceed then. At the end of 2008, Fiat and Chrysler began to discuss the merger. On

U.s Auto Industrys Market Share And Fluctuations

879 words - 4 pages U.S Auto Industry's Market Share and Fluctuations The U. S. auto industry's share of the market has experienced fluctuations over the past 50 years. These fluctuations have been caused by many reasons, but some of the main reasons include quality, price, and foreign competition. The Ford Motor Company, General Motors Company, and the Chrysler Corporation, a.k.a. "The Big Three", are the three largest manufacturers of automobiles in

U.S Automobile Industry's Share of the Market

956 words - 4 pages The U. S. auto industry's share of the market has experienced fluctuations over the past 50 years. These fluctuations have been caused by many reasons, but some of the main reasons include quality, price, and foreign competition.The Ford Motor Company, General Motors Company, and the Chrysler Corporation, a.k.a. 'The Big Three', are the three largest manufacturers of automobiles in the world. ' The Big Three' hold nearly 75% of the market and

Cultural Analysis

1497 words - 6 pages LH sedan are some of the excellent pioneering examples built by Crystler.in terms of market revenue Chrysler shares climbed to 23% in 97 and product development cost shrank to 2.8% compared with 8% of general motors and 6% of ford. Chrysler had always proven itself to be the risk taker as it had brought itself back to business from almost being bankrupt four times after the world war second, which earned Chrysler the title of “comeback kid”. Later

chrysler

837 words - 4 pages    The Chrysler corporation was founded by Walter Chrysler in 1925. Chrysler is one of the Big Three American automobile manufactures. The Big Three is when used in relation to the America automotive industry, most generally refers to the three major US automotive companies: General Motors, Chrysler,and Ford. The team are also sometimes used in relation to the Three major automakers of other countries. Chrysler greatly expanded in 1928, when it

Daimler Chrysler

3781 words - 15 pages rather than simply reducing shifts.Chrysler was, at one time, the most profitable automaker in the industry, but has now reported a third quarter loss of $512 million U.S. last year due to high product launch costs, consumer incentives, stiffer competition and decreased demand which has also affected Ford and General Motors. A fourth quarter loss of $1.25 billion U.S. is expected when year-end financial results are released.Article 3: ?Daimler

Similar Essays

Daimler And Chrysler Merger Essay

1170 words - 5 pages the time of the merger with Daimler Benz, the company was faced with increasing competition from the Japanese automakers, Chrysler was seeing substantial decrease in sales and was not in a dominate position in the merger. (Waller David, 2001)DaimlerDaimler Benz was incorporated in 1926 after the merger of Daimler and Benz companies. They are currently the 13th largest auto manufacturer in the world and hold the position for being the largest truck

Sony And General Motors Essay

4209 words - 17 pages that presumably accounted for Sloan and Morita's remarkable success. The often-unstated implications of such analyses suggest, therefore, that we would do well to broaden our views of management and of risk.Introduction This paper is about the management styles and philosophies of two executives, Alfred P. Sloan, Jr. of General Motors and Akio Morita of Sony, who managed by exception in rather unusual circumstances.We begin with the presumption

Merger Of Daimler Benz And Chrysler Corp

2434 words - 10 pages determine whether or not the anticipated benefits were realized after the DaimlerChrysler merger is shareholder value or Economic Value Added (EVA), which is a technique developed by the account firm Stern Stewart. The EVA is after-tax profits, minus the cost of capital (McElroy).In the instance of the merger and acquisition of Daimler-Benz and Chrysler Corporation, "both of the companies were extremely successful using their own methods," says

General Motors: Company Overview And Comparative Analysis

1906 words - 8 pages United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe and Latin America.Competitor AnalysisGeneral Motors Corporation operates in the Motor vehicles and car bodies section. My analysis compares General Motors with three other major automobile manufacturers: Ford Motor Company (2005 sales of $177.09 billion of which 87% was Automotive), DaimlerChrysler AG of Germany (149.78 billion Euro ([US$181.33 billion) of which 33% was Chrysler Cars), and Toyota Motor