Genetical Engineering Is Wrong Essay

939 words - 4 pages

     At one time, golden rice was just a wild idea that Ingo Potrykus thought up. Optimally, golden rice would improve the lives of millions of the poorest people in the world. The rice would contain beta-carotene which is the building block for vitamin A. However, imagining golden rice was one thing and bringing it into existence was another. He struggled for years with his colleagues to deal with the finicky growing habits of the rice they transplanted to a greenhouse near the foot hills of the Swiss Alps. Potrykus and his colleagues became successful in the spring of 1999. By creating golden rice, Potrykus wanted to be sure it would reach malnourished children of the developing world; those for whom it was intended. He knew that would not be easy because of the fact that the golden grains also contained snippets of DNA borrowed from bacteria and daffodils. Being a product of genetical engineering, Potrykus's product was entangled in a web of hopes, fears, and political baggage.
     Until now, genetically engineered crops were created to resist insect pests or to control the growth of weeds by using herbicides. However, in this circumstance the genetically engineered rice not only benefits the farmers who grow it, but primarily the consumers who eat it. These consumers include at least a million children who die every year because they are weakened by vitamin-A deficiency and an additional 350,000 people who go blind. In addition to this concern, there is another. It is prospected that by the year 2020, the demand for grain, both for human consumption and for animal feed, is projected to go up by nearly half, while the amount of farmable land will probably dwindle, thus introducing a whole new series of problems.
     There is only a short four step process that enables one to produce golden rice. The genes that give golden rice is its ability to make beta-carotene in its endosperm come from daffodils and a bacterium called Erwinia uredovora. These genes, along with promoters (segments of DNA that activate genes), are inserted into plasmids that occur inside a species of bacterium known as Agrobacterium tumefaciens. These agrobacteria are then added to a Petri dish containing rice embryos. As they "infect" the embryos, they also transfer the genes that encode the instructions for making beta-carotene. The transgenic rice plants must now be crossed with strains of rice that are grown locally and are suited to a particular region's climate and growing condition.
     There are a few concerns with product such as golden rice. All foods created through genetic engineering, are potential sources of allergens. The genes that are transferred contain instructions for making proteins, in which all proteins are not created equal- some proteins cause allergic reactions. "Genetic pollution" is another major concern. Pollen grains from wind-pollinated plants as corn and canola, for example, are carried far and wide. Transgenic canola, for instance,...

Find Another Essay On Genetical Engineering is Wrong

Discover Engineering: Architectural Engineering Essay

1572 words - 7 pages building process. For example, when things go wrong, you can restore it and try to improve it. This contributes to the solution because it helps om what my achievement is. This is my grand challenge that i have chosen. About the Author Hello, my name is Randy Cifuentes. I am an engineer, i am 14 years old. My birthday is on November 10. I am a 1999 baby. I have chosen that certain engineering discipline because i like what It does. It has what

Genetic Engineering is Unethical Essay

1135 words - 5 pages (Epstein 5). Others argue that such inventions as human clones, which are genetically constructed humans, and other genetically created figures, are wrong and should be stopped (Epstein 5). Overwhelming textual evidence proves that genetic engineering is not beneficial to society. Accordingly, genetic engineering is unethical and therefore should be stopped. One reason why genetic engineering should cease is because genetic engineering disrupts

Is Genetic Engineering Superior or Appalling?

1613 words - 6 pages genetic engineering to be considered as playing a role as “God”. Some people also believe it to be a chance for them to live a life without any diseases. Many different kinds of diseases are being treated such as cancer, AIDS, diabetes, and Bubble boy. The default on using Genetic Engineering for humans is if something were to go wrong it could kill people or spike up an even worse case of the disease that is harder to treat. Other ways genetic

The Engineer Extraordinaire

1845 words - 7 pages paycheck. If an individual is pursuing engineering only because of its yield, they are following the wrong doctrine. Pain and sorrow lie at the end of the road traveled by pure money-seekers. Although this seems contradictory to this report as a whole, it is the truth. Someone should pursue a career they love, and if engineering is that career choice, they are a lucky individual. They, along with other prospective engineers will succeed with the

Genetic Engineering

1727 words - 7 pages proven to be limited. The power of genetic engineering is great, and can be used to create more useful plants and animals, however, the safety of this science should always be considered dangerous, as there are many things which can go wrong. Personally, I am against genetic engineering unless it is developed and refined into a 100% safe science.I also believe that if any food is genetically modified, it should be labeled, so the consumer knows

Engineered Life vs. God Given Life

1317 words - 5 pages When considering the social context of our society today, it is not surprising that the concepts of morality and ethics are introduced in the debate over genetic engineering. Is it ethically correct as a society for scientists to alter human nature by editing genetics? Is it moral for an engineer to “play God” in the eyes of some and determine which genes will be passed on to the next generation? Bioethics, a critical part of any medical field

Genetic Engineering: Consequences of Playing God

730 words - 3 pages will be." (Turner).Though some would say the benefits of genetic engineering outweigh the risks, there is too much that can go wrong for genetic engineering to be seriously considered right now. Science is about precision, and genetics leave too many things to chance. Genetic engineering is a bad idea due to the current ethical issues, the risks involved, and the potential for unseen consequences. Works Cited: Dutton, Gail. (1995, September 11

This essay depicts the morality of genetic engineering.

1320 words - 5 pages defective genes ( Clarke 1)" The part of genetic engineering that is wrong is holding back the natural process of science evolution." Some benefits already exist in medicine, but the true benefits can only be seen when genes are further altered and experimented with. "The real benefit that will help mankind is when bioengineers will be able to replace a cancer or defective gene with agene that does not have an error in its genetic code

Genetic Engineering

2142 words - 9 pages partly to blame on the ignorance of society, because it believes that genetic engineering is wrong. The part of genetic engineering that is wrong is holding back the natural process of science evolution.Some benefits are used in medicine today, but the real benefits will come as genes can be altered more. The real benefit that will help mankind is when bioengineers will be able to replace a cancer or defective gene with a gene that does not have an

ethics

892 words - 4 pages IntroductionFrequently there is some confusion between the ethics and the morals. In simplistic terms, morals refer more to the individual's system of conduct to determine whether something is right or wrong, good or bad. Individual morals are usually fixed early in life, changing little over the years. Ethics generally refers to a field of philosophy describing a social system in which morals are applied, where there may be written standards

ethics

892 words - 4 pages IntroductionFrequently there is some confusion between the ethics and the morals. In simplistic terms, morals refer more to the individual's system of conduct to determine whether something is right or wrong, good or bad. Individual morals are usually fixed early in life, changing little over the years. Ethics generally refers to a field of philosophy describing a social system in which morals are applied, where there may be written standards

Similar Essays

Biotechnology Essay

859 words - 3 pages engineering is used to take genes and segments of DNA from one species and put them into another species. Genetical Engineering provides a set of techniques to cut DNA either randomly or at a number of specific sites. Once isolated one can study the different segments of DNA of another cell or organism. Genetic engineering makes it possible to break through the species barrier and to shuffle information between completely unrelated species

History Of Chemistry Essay

1045 words - 5 pages faster and more effectively. A career in biochemistry could involve genetical engineering. A biochemist in this field could genetically modify plants, animals and many more things. There are many ways to put genetical engineering to use. One of the most common things to be genetically modified is food. Biochemists could genetically modify an orange or a banana. A biochemist could help out with the growth of bananas. They could use their

Skaelene Essay

4692 words - 19 pages the solution. Rifkin believes that there is life beyond the two technologies he discusses. It is not impossible to rid our society of the nuclear weapon or genetical engineering. ?Our generation must realize that the future is never fated. It is always willed into existence.? (80) It is the human will that can change the worldview. Security does not have to be in control. Security can be found in a number of ways that come from a different way of

Pros And Cons Of Improving Humans By Genetic Engineering.

832 words - 3 pages be banned. Cloning is wrong because it's like we are trying to play God. Also, then humans would be just another man-made thing instead of a blessing. Germline engineering should be banned because it is wrong to design your own baby. It not right that the parent is making important decisions and the child has no say in it. Finally, I think that somatic genetic engineering is acceptable. All it is doing is altering your physical