This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Gmo Labeling Legislation Is Necessary Now

1444 words - 6 pages

Are genetically engineered (GE) foods or genetically modified organisms (GMOs) required to be labeled? Unfortunately, though polls consistently show a majority of Americans want to know if the food they are purchasing contains GMOs, powerful biotech corporations continue to keep this information hidden from the public (GMO Facts). Genetic engineering is the transfer of genetic material from one organism to another, including unrelated species such as plants and animals. For example, scientists may insert a gene from a fish that thrives in a icy part of the ocean into a strawberry in hope that the fruit could become frost-resistant, however, cross-reactivity could occur if those who consume the altered berry are allergic to fish. Genetically modified foods have been in existence since the early 1990s, and they are not going away any time soon. In the European Union for example, GMOs are widely either restricted or banned if the “GMO in question poses a risk to human health or the environment” (Health and Consumers). I believe that genetically modified organisms are not only bad for the global economy, but a threat to the safety and integrity of the global food supply. Therefore, I propose legislation be passed in the United States requiring corporations to label foods that contain GMOs because we deserve the right to know what we are consuming.
Consumers have the right to know what they are eating, especially since GMOs could have negative health effects on humans. Jeffery M. Smith, Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology and consumer activist about GM foods discusses that the Bt toxin, regularly engineered into many foods as a barrier between the environment, causes skin irritation, nausea, fever, and can lead to increased incidence of allergies as well as compromise the immune response (Skancke 17). If the Bt toxin, a common biological pesticide found in many GM foods can cause individuals numerous problems, consumers should be able to make an informed choice whether or not to procure and consume products containing GMOs in the future. Giuseppe Nacci, an Italian physician, published an article in the highly acclaimed Gerson Institute Newsletter, which brought to light that “genetically modified foods disrupt the body’s ability to fight disease. Recent scientific research has shown that transgenic food causes the immune system of rats to collapse.” If rats’ immune systems fail to function properly after ingesting GM foods, humans, who have been ingesting these foods for about two decades, should have the right to make informed decisions to prevent any health concerns from arising. Making these choices is challenging today due to the simple fact that the average consumer does not know what he or she may be eating. Looking at a label on a product and deciding whether to consume a GMO is currently not a consumer’s choice in 48 out of 50 states in the United States. Farmers, however, have a bigger say in whether GMOs...

Find Another Essay On GMO Labeling Legislation is Necessary Now

GMO Labeling Essay

1933 words - 8 pages effect is most pronounced in the countries of the European Union, where legislation has limited the marketing of genetically modified products. Regulations adopted in July 2001 can be generalized into two parts. The first part is complete traceability of all GMO products ¡Ýfrom farm to table.¡Ü The second part requires labeling on all products with genetically modified elements in them exceeding 1% of product content (Economist 1). Outside the

Do We Need to Label Foods Containing Genetically Modified Organisms?

659 words - 3 pages participants’ cognitive world” (Sénémeaud, C., & Somat, A.,2009). Conclusion The example with the Prop 37 and the GMO labeling reflects on the theory of cognitive dissonance and persuasion. Even strong beliefs can be changed if they are being persuaded in the right way and in the right moment. The persuader will provide all the necessary tools and arguments to prove their point of view. The votes on Proposition 37 were highly persuaded through the


1013 words - 5 pages U.S should be competent enough to do that too. America is currently the most prominent GMO using country in the world. A solution to the mutated food being used depends on Americans realizing that these products do not benefit the health of anyone. The best way right now is the use of accurate labeling. If associations like the FDA are forced to make companies label what they are selling than the U.S. can have a chance at consuming less GMO

Say Yes to Gmo Labeling

1069 words - 5 pages Say Yes to GMO Labeling Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have begun to swarm our supermarket shelves, yet many are not aware that their foods contain GMOs. This is due to the lack of labels on America’s processed foods. Labeling not only points out the materials used in our foods, but provides awareness to the use of GMO products. 93% of Americans currently support labeling, but America has not successfully enforced it (Genetically

I want to know what I'm eating

1975 words - 8 pages ideal example of how it is possible to remove GMOs out of our foods. This act alone shows the use of GMOs is not necessary. Although this is a victory for those who want the labeling or complete elimination of GMOs, it is not enough and the public knows it, “Now that General Mills has completed a year-long process to remove GMOs from regular Cheerios, consumers will pressure the company to remove GMOs from their other cereals, starting with

Article Critique on GMO

694 words - 3 pages the GMO labeling concerns and provide regulations if necessary. She also gives readers various facts about how different states tried but failed to implement the labeling regulation on GM products.After showing FDA as a potential candidate to take part in the GMO food fight and giving brief idea about the lack of state authority to regulate concerns regarding GM labeling, the author shows the problems of the state GMO laws not being able to

Governmentally Modified Organics: GMO's

2605 words - 11 pages splicing have made the public extremely wary of this selective form of genetic modification” (Brody 89). Americans are not aware of the dangers of GMO, or even know what it exactly is. The public has not been educated enough. The ignorance is due to the un-regulated labeling system for GMO products. Food grown or imported to the US does not require labeling of any kind. “Much of the world already requires labeling of genetically engineered food

The Benefits of Genetically Modified Organisms

1038 words - 5 pages change. Changes are something that can not be found in nature or in the process of cross breeding plants. The two most commonly used GMO in the United States are soy and corn. Two plants have many benefits, soy is now resistant to a herbicide called Roundup. New soy plant allows the farmers to kill weeds with the Roundup without killing the plant itself which is amazing. There are benefited of corn by feeding more people than it normally

research paper gmo

582 words - 3 pages , and the United State government is at this time maintaining the labeling must be necessary on Genetically Modified Organisms foods individual in situation those ingredients and nutritional worth make a huge change since old-style resources. Their assertion was simply support by Argentina and Canada, major Genetically Modified Organisms crops manufacture nation state; moreover, it positions contradictory toward other nation state such as the

Genetically Modified Organisms

920 words - 4 pages Yellow squash. Without any labeling for GMO products in the marketplace, there is no way to know what is in the food consumers are purchasing. Without labeling there is also no way to monitor the potential health effects of eating GMO foods over the long-term. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently does not require companies producing foods containing GMOs to submit their products for review or approval. The FDA, however does encourage

Should Products Containing Genetically Modified Crops Be Labeled As So?

614 words - 3 pages available GMO and non-GMO foods. In fact, genetic modifications can actually improve nutritional content for some foods” (Dr. Lamaux- University of California, Berkeley). With there being no difference between both GMOs and non-GMOs, the labeling of foods containing Genetically Modified crops is completely unnecessary. Forcing the labeling of GMO foods would be a costly venture, not only for the companies producing products containing GMOs

Similar Essays

Gmo Labeling Legislation Essay

1111 words - 5 pages million to defeat Prop 37 in California because they think that labeling GM foods would cause unnecessary fear in consumers and lead to a “devastating loss in profits for GMO companies”(Fight the GM). These companies may be right about unnecessary fear, but it would be of the unknown. In short, these companies are wrong, just like with food allergen labeling many years ago; everyone deserves the basic right to know what is in the food they are

Gmo Labeling Legislation Essay

1052 words - 5 pages GM food is great for people, the economy, and the environment and the future; if this is true then why are companies afraid of mandatory labeling laws for GM foods? Large genetic engineering firms such as Monsanto spent at least $41 million to defeat Prop 30 in California because they think that labeling GM foods would cause unnecessary fear in consumers and lead to a “devastating loss in profits for GMO companies. These companies may be right

People Have The Right To Know What They Are Eating; Labeling Gm Os Is Necessary

1027 words - 5 pages necessary. Michael Hansen, a senior staff scientist contends that foods need to be labeled for GMOs because there is evidence that suggests a connection between GE crops and allergenicity. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show an 18% increase in reported food allergy cases among children between 1997 and 20072 . Consumers deserve the right to know if they are eating GMOs, so the labeling of GMO products needs to be nationally

Anti Dumping Is A Necessary Part Of International Trade Legislation

1257 words - 5 pages dumping threatens to injure domestic market. The best way of interaction is involvement an independent arbiter. The World Trade Organisation (WTO) takes this function upon itself. This conflict of interest could be solved by anti-dumping legislation - a powerful instrument of international trade regulation. The general meaning of the term “dumping” is “unfair export”, which means exporting goods at an unreasonably low price, which much more