This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Government Affiliation And Cloning Essay

1415 words - 6 pages

Government Affiliation and Cloning

Abstract
The theory to alter and duplicate a human being first arose in the early 1900s. It became widely controversial since the entrance of the experiments on real animals by the 1990s. Influenced by its citizens, the governments all over the world stepped in to regulate the new process by establishing specific laws tackling the issue. Each government differed from the others, and hence, each national law varies from another. However, attempts were made to unify the regulations under international circumstances in organizations such as the United Nations. Still undergoing conformation, the effort to halt cloning failed to stay constant, and would continue to change in the future.

Since the successful cloning of the sheep Dolly in Roslin Institution of Scotland on July 5, 1996 (Peters, 2003, p.161), governments wrestled with the ideal of human cloning. Thrust with the responsibility to regulate a new form of artificial mammalian reproduction, and possibly human reproduction, the government became the deciding factor amidst the storm of controversy. Dolly signifies the first mammal cloned from the fully differentiated cell, which already had the genes of its function fully expressed. It allowed the duplication of another individual from any living cell of body. Ian Wilmut announced and patented the Roslin Technique, the method to clone Dolly, on February 22, 1997 and explained the details on the issue of Nature five days later (Peters, 2003, p.161). The reaction was immediate. Within hours of Wilmut’s announcement, the Church of Scotland released its rebuttal, criticizing the event as unethical. Likewise, the world was quick to establish its stance, pronouncing the cloning of human as morally wrong. Many theologians and ethicists released their own statements, ranging from the simple declaration that it is against God’s will, to clone to the more complicated theories of violating personal freedom and identity. It was not long until the governments involved themselves in the matter, having been pressured by organizations such as The United Methodist Genetic Science Task Force to ban the practice of cloning humans (Peters, 2003,
Government Affiliation 2
p.160). Laws pertaining to the restriction of human cloning were quickly established and enforced over the world; however, some countries resisted the movement more than the others, creating a gradient of varying laws on cloning.
Since the declaration of the success of Dolly, United States has undergone many changes. During the Clinton administration, the National Bioethics Advisory Commission drew a charter to prohibit the creation of a child through cloning. The act extended to March 10, 2001, and defeated cloning advocate Richard Seed’s proposal to raise a fund for human cloning. After the succession of the Bush Jr. administration, the United House of Representatives voted and banned all human cloning, successfully passing a law to imprison as well as...

Find Another Essay On Government Affiliation and Cloning

The Benefits of Human Cloning Essay

1129 words - 5 pages genes as a great basketball player or a runway model, he or she will still be biologically, psychologically, morally and legally different (Wachbroit). Cloning will not be able to make the “perfect child,” but it will be able to create a baby with the genes of someone other than his or her parents. Human cloning is very beneficial to the human society and the scientific world. Even though many people want the government to ban the

Just A Copy Essay

925 words - 4 pages find new ways to help humanity. I believe that it is animal abuse to put the animals through the torture of cloning because they simply can’t choose. They are forced to become test subjects. Cloning isn’t right for animals because they don’t have an opinion of their own nor can they state it. There is also a very low success rate of only 5% out of 100 that are successfully cloned. There is also a loss of government funds and money. Cloning may

Currissa Goodwin

823 words - 4 pages future and in the past time has changed and many differences were made. In his Dystopian Society Huxley portrays masses of niches where the government produces clones for specific reasons. Huxley decides throughout Brave New World that cloning humans is unethical. He then becomes in contact with the society’s most powerful Alphas and Betas clones. Huxley suggest in BNW that lower class groups in cloning humans to act like servants to terrorize

Arguement for the Legalization of Cloning

2648 words - 11 pages was the first organism from adult cells ever to be cloned. Cloning has been practiced for many years and has many benefits ranging from the human health to scientific research. The United States government should deregulate cloning and provide more funding for research and development, as cloning is beneficial for finding a cure for cancer and many other degenerative genes. Cloning is the copy of a biological entity; such as a gene, a cell, or an

Therapeutic Cloning

2585 words - 10 pages (Healey, J 2007). There are also many ethical issues for this technique of cloning that contribute to the research of therapeutic cloning. This essay will outline the ethical concerns of therapeutic cloning and stem cell research, Therapeutic cloning practice and policies in other countries, How the Government came to making therapeutic cloning legal in Australia and what the future holds for therapeutic cloning? Therapeutic cloning and the

Cloning-definitions, pros, cons

1626 words - 7 pages cloning, although the constitution was written before the idea of cloning existed.(6:1) Should the federal government have the right to suppress scientific exploration? Maybe, since cloningclashes with the President's morals.Even though religion is kept out of government it is still a logic in debates over cloning. Accordingto the bible:"God made us in his own image, and he is the one that gives life and takes it" (Genesis1:26-28)so a religious person

The controversy over cloning

2551 words - 10 pages (Kelly; Prentice, "Promise"). As the science and technology stand today, therapeutic cloning and other embryonic approaches will divert resources from promising research and delay cures. In 2003, the federal government spent about $25 million for embryonic stem cell research when that money could have helped further the cause of adult stem cell research, which is currently in human trials. "In addition, private investors have abundantly invested in

Cloning

622 words - 2 pages diseases could cure diseases. Leukemia patients would not have to wait a long time for bone marrow transplants anymore. One of the newest treatments for cancer is called angiogenesis, but by cloning scientist might be "able to cure cancer" (Simon Smith). Angiostatin and endostatin are injections that stifle blood vessel growth when put into human cancers cloned in mice. In conclusion, whether the government bans cloning or not, it is probably

Ethicality of Human Cloning

2296 words - 10 pages this can be a good cause if used correctly. The government would be using money that could possibly be going to the sick, poor, hungry, and places that need to stay open that run off of government money(such as post offices, schools, etc.). It can cost a country a lot of money to even be able to run this project, and to even run it successfully (Goodnough) Since there isn’t hardly any data on human cloning, the only other cloning that has

SHOULD CONGRESS BAN EMBRYONIC CLONING? August 2002

1100 words - 5 pages Supreme Court ruled that reproductive activities may be limited by the government if there is a compelling state interest for doing so.The destruction of embryos in the cloning process is inevitable. A pro-life argument against cloning is that a cloned embryo is a reproduced human and has protection under Fifth Amendment. Pro-choice groups are arguing that if embryonic cloning is banned it is like saying to sick or injured people that a clump of

America Needs Cloning

1545 words - 6 pages started to doubt if cloning was ethical and morally correct. The government began to ban and impose constraints on cloning as a result of public pressure. After the cloning of Dolly, President Clinton was quick to cut all federal funding for research of human cloning (Lester & Hefley, 123). In December of 2001, the United Kingdom put a ban on human reproductive cloning but not therapeutic cloning (Seppa, 32). Even though cloning raises some

Similar Essays

To Clone Or Not To Clone Part 2

794 words - 3 pages procreative liberty; meaning the government should not interfere with the right of individuals to reproduce in any manner they choose (Genetics & Public Policy). The arguments that have been made opposing human cloning are as follows: recombinant DNA cloning, therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning would require the destruction of human embryos, recombinant DNA cloning and therapeutic cloning could possibly harm a woman?s health

Benefits Of Cloning To Humanity Essay

1275 words - 5 pages be ruined. Cloning is more beneficial to animals than to humans, due to fact that humans will face more life threatening situations than cloning the animals. All these causes and effects to both animals and humans has started not only ethical debates but as well as political decisions on rather it should be legal or not. Although the United States are facing the debate amongst each other, the government still respects our constitutional rights

The Ethics Of Human Cloning Essay

1307 words - 5 pages the parent’s genetic makeup. The age differences and environmental factors will affect their development, and it will not permit the clones to develop the exact same and perfected skills. Therefore, the cloned object will not be the exact copy of each other and the chance of creating a gene pool, a group of genetically altered clones, is very unlikely. Even if the government legalizes cloning, it will remain very costly stopping the practice of

Genetics Essay

970 words - 4 pages . There are laws against human cloning in Canada, Denmark, England, Norway, Spain, and the UK. Even in the USA, the government doesn't allow to clone human. (Because in USA, the human right is higher than everything)ConclusionIn the end, I think cloning is new technology, it should be accepted, how to look upon this technique, first we should know the advantages and disadvantages, then we should know the effect of cloning for human and the animal, third we will take the action: To advocate the animal cloning but be against with the human cloning.