Grant And Lee Essay

905 words - 4 pages

Grant and Lee

     Throughout the course of my history career, which is not very long, teachers and professors have always focused on the point that General Grant was a butchering alcoholic who won the war solely on the account of his stubborn personality. And on the other hand, teachers portrayed General Lee as a masterful strategist, who used Christian values in order to win the rebellion. However, in Fuller’s account of the two Generals, he alleges through data and personal intuition that General Grant was actually a strategist and mastermind that not only won the war but also, lost fewer soldiers.
     During the past century there has always been this distinct cultural separation of the north and south (Union and Confederate). The main reason for this is due in part to the cultural differences of the north and south during the late nineteenth century. Citizens of the north believe that Grant was the better General because, well, he was the commander of the Union army. On the other side of things, southerners undoubtedly know that General Lee was the superior mind of the two because, well, he was the commander of the Confederate army. And even though the Confederates lost the war, people manipulate the truth and explain the reasons that the south lost the war were because Grant had the larger army, could kill off more of his troops, and still be able to take his objectives. But in Fuller’s description of the two, he analyses the personalities of the two Generals and analyses the psychological differences that made them choose certain strategies and tactics in which Grant is shown to be the superior commander.
Is this book biased? Of course, but as Fuller explains in the preface of the book, his instinctive premise was to show that Lee was the superior General because, he was taught this in his previous education, where he later states, “…so much for school education.”(Page 8)
As an overview of the book, Fuller does not indulge in reacting all of the battles of the war, that would be too much material. Instead, he sets up some of the battles in aspect of format, which he used to reenact the strategies that were influenced by the men’s personalities. For instance, after the battle of Bull Run General Lee’s inability to communicate effectively will be his downfall. Floyd states, “his [Lee] subordinates were at loggerheads, his personality at once crippled his generalship, for he refused to take command, that is to say-he refused to impose his will upon them and so established unity of direction.”(137)
The direct example of this occurs on August 7, 1861,...

Find Another Essay On Grant and Lee

Robert E. Lee 's Life and Achievements

828 words - 3 pages the south. In 1864, the new General of the Union General Ulysses S. Grant, sought to destroy Lee’s army. Grant pinned Lee down at the Confederate capital, Richmond, Virginia. Lee repelled each attack that Grant sent against him, but with larger numbers and reinforcements Lee was fighting for a lost cause. Lee repelled an attack by Grant that tried to capture Petersburg, a major supplier to Richmond. Lee entrenched himself around Petersburg. Lee

robert e. lee Essay

1011 words - 4 pages an impossible battle, the union forces had and advantageous position and more men. After Gettysburg, Lee retreated back to Virginia for the rest of the war. With the loss of more and more soldiers, Lee had no choice but to start taking a defensive position. In the spring of 1864, General Ulysses Grant got control of the union forces and decided to bring Lee into northern Virginia and crush the confederate forces there. Grant rushed to Petersburg

Generals of the Civil War

1622 words - 6 pages The civil war had many great soldiers fighting for what they thought was right for their country. It also had some of the greatest generals the United States of America has ever seen, sadly, some of these generals were on the losing side, but this fact does not make them any less great. Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson are all evidence of greatness in a time of darkness. Robert E. Lee was born on January 19, 1807

Robert. E. Lee After The War

799 words - 3 pages April ninth Lee surrendered his army to Ulysses S. Grant, with any outward show of emotion. The surrendering of the confederate army came to be known as Appomattox. Grant added one last small touch of respect, providing the right coda for Appomattox. As Lee rode away, Grant stepped down from the porch he was standing on, took off his hat and stood in silence. So did the rest of his down-ridden staff. There is no single greater act of military tribute

Robert E Lee

1217 words - 5 pages Confederate troops built trenches to protect Richmond. In 1865, after nine months Union troops under General Ulysses S. Grant broke Confederate lines during the Siege of Petersburg and Richmond. Lee was forced to retreat to Richmond and Danville station. Lee then attempted to meet up with a train full of supplies at Appomattox Station in Virginia, but was surrounded the Union Army which has gotten there first. Lee was surrounded on all sides and

Role of Ulysses S. Grant in the American Civil War

1536 words - 6 pages During the Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant played a main part in the Union’s Victory. He did this by: Winning multiple battles, his expertise as a leader, and defeating Robert E. Lee. Grant started his career as an officer by going through the military academy called WestPoint. After graduating as a Second Lieutenant, he made his way through the ranks in the Mexican-American War. During the Civil War, he was promoted to Brigadier General, Major

Life Of Robert E.Lee

3998 words - 16 pages Victories, and Stalemate Spotsylvania General Ulysses Simpson Grant, who was now leader of the entire Union army, took on Lee in the battle of the Wilderness in May 1864. General Grant was attacking, and because Lee was not making it easy, Grant backed up. Grant's men thought that he was retreating, but Grant was not Hooker. Grant went around and hit Lee again. Lee realized what Grant was doing so he went to the Spotsylvania Courthouse

Ulysses S Grant

826 words - 4 pages Chattanooga. On March 9, 1864, Lincoln promotes Ulysses S. Grant to Lieutenant General and then 3 days later is appointed to General Chief of all U.S armies. Shortly after this, the two legendary commanders, Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee, face off in three battles: Battle of the Wilderness (May 7, 1864; draw), Spottsylvania Campaign (May 10, 1864; draw), and the Battle of Cold Harbor (June 3, 1864; draw). In these battles, Grant did lose more

Robert E Lee

993 words - 4 pages , and not an exemplary leader like Abraham Lincoln. Doing so, Lee is connecting the people to their president, boosting morale, and hence productivity. The public, however, does not view General Ulysses S. Grant in such a positive light. The Union residents see Grant as a man who is overcome by his addiction of drinking and smoking, earning the disdain of General McClellan who was “annoyed and offended” by Grant’s obsession. General Grant is also a

Ulysses S. Grant

1164 words - 5 pages advantage to the Union army. The union had many civilians willing to join the army’s ranks, but the South had few people able or willing to fight in this war. This gave Grant’s Union Army a direct advantage over Lee’s army of North Virginia. And when Grant continued to advance on Richmond, he was the first commander to not be defeated at Robert E. Lee’s hands. Lee and Grant clashed several times in Virginia but Grant out-maneuvered Lee in the end and

Atticus vs. Grant

993 words - 4 pages , which was found out when he said, “For a number of reasons …The main one is, if I didn’t I couldn’t hold up my head in town, I couldn’t represent this country in the legislature…” (Lee 100). Atticus stated this when he was explaining to scout of why he is defending Tom Robinson. This shows that Atticus and Grant are similar due to their passion of learning. Grant and Atticus were both entrusted in big responsibilities that affected other

Similar Essays

Grant And Lee: A Study In Contrasts

738 words - 3 pages Abstract: Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts Wars and conflicts may determine the rise or fall of great leaders. Even today, such leaders are portrayed as martyrs for their impeccable courage and valor on the battlefield. In Bruce Catton's essay, Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts, he reveals the different leadership styles of both generals and then presents the strength of two conflicting currents that entered into a final collision, the

"Neat People Vs. Sloppy People" Vs. "Grant And Lee"

668 words - 3 pages After reading Suzanne Britt’s “Neat People vs. Sloppy People” and Bruce Catton’s “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts,” there are many comparisons that can be made. Although they seem to be very different, these essays are a lot alike. First, both essays compare two different “types” of people, although Catton’s “Grant and Lee” uses specific people as representatives of the “types” he compares, while Britt does not use specific people, only

Grant And Lee: A Study In Contrasts – Comparison/Contrast Essay

787 words - 3 pages Both Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee were men of integrity, determination, passion and great skill. This is where their similarities end as Lee’s empowerment ideology differed from that of Grant’s aristocratic beliefs. Bruce Catton wrote about the two men in the essay, “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts”. Catton, a Pulitzer Prize winning author and Civil War Historian, provides a brief character analysis of both men in this essay. The

Comparing And Contrasting Ulysses S. Grant And Robert E. Lee Two Icons In American History

781 words - 3 pages No matter how much something can differ some characteristics are shared. As strange as it sounds it’s very true, both Grant and Lee are two different yet similar people. As these two fights for what they believe in, though their beliefs are different they share some qualities. Ulysses S. Grant wanted the nation to expand and look forward towards the future. Robert E. Lee thought that an old aristocratic way of life was the better choice and