Group Dynamics In 12 Angry Men

1594 words - 6 pages

In the 1957 classic 12 Angry Men, group dynamics are portrayed through a jury deliberation. Group dynamics is concerned with the structure and functioning of groups as well as the different types of roles each character plays. In the film, twelve men are brought together in a room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The personality conflicts, the joint effort and the functioning of several minds together to search for the truth are just a few characteristics of group dynamics at work. The whole spectrum of humanity is represented in this movie, from the bigotry of Juror No.10 to the coldly analytical No.4. Whether they brought good or bad qualities to the jury room, they all affected the outcome.

At the outset, eleven jurors vote in favor of convicting the accused without even discussing a single shred of the evidence presented at the trial. When a group becomes too confident and fails to think realistically about its task, groupthink can occur. Since it takes a longer time to communicate and reach a consensus in a group, decision making in a group is time-consuming. Therefore, when groups want to achieve a quick decision, as several jurors were eager to do, they make riskier decisions than individuals. Since not any individual is completely accountable for the decision, members will have a tendency to accept more extreme solutions. Only one brave juror refused to vote guilty. Juror #8 refused to fall into the groupthink trap and ultimately saved an innocent man's life. He openly admits that he does not know whether the accused is guilty or innocent and that he finds it necessary to simply talk about the case. What follows is not only a discussion of the particular facts of the case, but also an intense examination of the personal baggage that each jury member brings to the room.

Juror #1 tries to impose order in his capacity as Foreman. He plays the role of 'appointed leader', or the individual who is assigned the leader position from the onset. A simple man who clearly does not understand the complexity of the task that lies before him but is trying to do everything not to let anyone else find this out. He appears at ease only once during the film ' when he talks about football. He has the misfortune to be selected Foreman of the jury ' a task he clearly does not enjoy. Juror #2 is a small, quite man who is clearly unaccustomed to giving his own opinion much less to expecting his views to be of any importance. In his subdued 'observer' and meek 'information giver' role, No. 2 apparently finds comfort in his job ' he is an accountant. Juror # 3 is probably the most complex personality in the film. He starts off like a pleasant self-made successful businessman, analyzing the case impartially, explaining the arguments well and is reasonably self-assured. As time goes on he becomes more and more passionate exploding in disbelieving anger and seems somehow to be personally involved with the case. His motivation for...

Find Another Essay On Group Dynamics in 12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men Essay

1167 words - 5 pages bring about the fair and impartial administration of justice in the courtroom.12 Angry Men makes its point that only reason and fact have a place in the courtroom. With a room full of imperfect, prejudiced and unsure men, the term reasonable doubt comes into play. In a criminal case, like this, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime. A reasonable doubt is an honest and reasonable

12 Angry Men Essay

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a

12 Angry Men

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

12 Angry Men

1438 words - 6 pages Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.      The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect

"12 Angry Men" - Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages addresses the other African American men in the room and talks about them and us. Telling these men that the defendant and his kind are taking things away from them. Harris and Sherblom write that all perspectives and points of view must be heard in order for the group to come to a true consensus in decisions.Challenges and WeaknessesThe jury faces several challenges such as group development, groupthink, and communication. The group also suffered from

Personality Types in 12 Angry Men

1349 words - 5 pages for us to make group decisions when we want to go out and have fun. These decisions generally include where we are going, what time we will be going and what we will be doing. In a like manner, the jurors in 12 Angry Men seem to have a similar problem. However, their problem is more difficult especially considering the fact that they don’t know their individual personalities and their decision will ultimately decides whether a person lives or dies

"12 angry men."

721 words - 3 pages that they really need to stop and think logicly about the facts in the case. The black and white film is appropriate to issues of right and wrong, a murder trial, and the death penalty. The camera work, focusing on the jurors' faces and the attitudes they reveal, and small clues about the backgrounds of individual jurors create a large canvas of twelve angry men who will decide whether the accused will live or die. Small "sub-scenes" within the

Analysis 12 angry men

3337 words - 13 pages WHY (meanings and audience effect). It's better to use fewer examples and analyse them well, than to give us a shopping list of every example in the text that proves your point.In Year 12 essays, quotes are less important than writing devices and features.You can use quotes anywhere in an essay but also ensure you concentrate on the various ways characters and events are presented. Obviously, metalanguage typical of both fiction and non-fiction

Analysis of 12 Angry Men

929 words - 4 pages The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class. The play was so alive and made me really feel like I was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the murder of his father. The play showed how one man didn’t give up in what he believed to be true. The play also showed a powerful leader who fought till the end. The

The Problem of Groupthink in 12 Angry Men

1102 words - 4 pages groups meeting, social roles and expected behavior. This notion is exemplified during the movie, "12 Angry Men". The purpose of this essay is to examine the movie content to display the groupthink symptoms in place. Groupthink consists of eight major factors that occur during the film's scenes, as the twelve men debate a premeditated murder court case. All of the factors continue to rise as the jury discusses the young man's fate. During the film, a

12 Angry Men: The Importance of Personality in Negotiation

1191 words - 5 pages people exhibit during negotiations when determining how the negotiation will unfold. In the movie “Twelve Angry Men”, juror number eight demonstrates an understanding of the effect of personality and behavior when building relationships, setting moods, and gaining power (Fonda & Rose, 1957). To understand the effect personality has on negotiation one must first understand what personality is. According to Berens and Nardi, personality is both

Similar Essays

Leadership In 12 Angry Men Essay

1335 words - 5 pages In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. Fonda not only exhibits the the 10 qualities of a leader but he uses these qualities to lead the entire jury to a vote of not guilty (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Early on in the film Fonda

Ignorance In 12 Angry Men Essay

706 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men, is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play is about the process of individuals and a court case, which is determining the fate of a teenager. It presents the themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Rose emphasises these three themes through the characters and the dialogue. Justice is the principle of moral rightness or equity. This is shown through juror number eight who isn’t sure whether or not the boy is actually

12 Angry Men Essay 1776 Words

1776 words - 7 pages 12 Angry Men PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: 12 ANGRY MEN12 Angry MenDon Carter, John Case, Cassandra SmithGrand Canyon University12 Angry MenIntroduction: In the movie "12 Angry Men" an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not

12 Angry Men Essay 1475 Words

1475 words - 6 pages frail man becomes exiled from the group when he tries to convict the boy saying, “we know how these “African-Americans” act. They are all the same. They lie, steal, and drink.” By presenting his argument based on looks and fallacies, he uses the peripheral persuasion. Finally, we reach the last social psychology concept in “Twelve Angry Men.” During deliberation, a fair majority of the jurors (several) tend to overemphasize personal factors of the