This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Group Polarization And Competi Essay

2328 words - 9 pages

On Tuesday, November 14, 1995, in what has been perceived as the years biggest non-event, the federal government shut down all "non-essential" services due to what was, for all intents and purposes, a game of national "chicken" between the House Speaker and the President. And, at an estimated cost of 200 million dollars a day, this dubious battle of dueling egos did not come cheap (Bradsher, 1995, p.16). Why do politicians find it almost congenitally impossible to cooperate? What is it about politics and power that seem to always put them at odds with good government? Indeed, is an effective, well run government even possible given the current adversarial relationship between our two main political parties? It would seem that the exercise of power for its own sake, and a competitive situation in which one side must always oppose the other on any issue, is incompatible with the cooperation and compromise necessary for the government to function. As the United States becomes more extreme in its beliefs in general, group polarization and competition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of goal attainment, will lead to more "showdown" situations in which the goal of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering.In this paper I will analyze recent political behavior in terms of two factors: Group behavior with an emphasis on polarization, and competition. However, one should keep in mind that these two factors are interrelated. Group polarization tends to exacerbate inter-group competition by driving any two groups who initially disagree farther apart in their respective views. In turn, a competitive situation in which one side must lose in order for the other to win (and political situations are nearly always competitive), will codify the differences between groups - leading to further extremism by those seeking power within the group - and thus, to further group polarization.In the above example, the two main combatants, Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich, were virtually forced to take uncompromising, disparate views because of the very nature of authority within their respective political groups. Group polarization refers to the tendency of groups to gravitate to the extreme of whatever opinion the group shares (Baron & Graziano, 1991, p.498-99). Therefore, if the extreme is seen as a desirable characteristic, individuals who exhibit extreme beliefs will gain authority through referent power. In other words, they will have characteristics that other group members admire and seek to emulate (p. 434). Unfortunately, this circle of polarization and authority can lead to a bizarre form of "one-upsmanship" in which each group member seeks to gain power and approval by being more extreme than the others. The end result is extremism in the pursuit of authority without any regard to the practicality or "reasonableness" of the beliefs in question. Since the direction of polarization is currently in opposite directions in our two party...

Find Another Essay On Group Polarization And Competi

Groups Essay

545 words - 2 pages judgmental tasks they early always exhibit polarization: the collective view is more extreme than the average of individual opinions in the same direction. The three explanationsof group polarization is social comparision, persuasive arguments theory and social identity. Groups can sometimes make bad decisions by not considering all the relevant information and not appraising the full range of options. Janis called this group think and believed that it is caused by a cohesive group being led by an over-direc

Polarization and Unification in Complete Maus

1693 words - 7 pages Polarization and Unification of Identity in The Complete Maus Trauma and recovery both have cycles in which an individual must pass through to heal. For those having lived through the Holocaust, these stages were well defined and could be addressed. However, when addressed, they only address the individual, not the group nor those affected in a secondary way. This creates a dichotomy between those experiencing an internal conflict, survivor or

Manuscript tobe checked

786 words - 4 pages al., 2010). The fundamental issue of efficiency enhancement in photovoltaic power convertors using QW structures is currently very active area of research, specifically focusing to enhance the carrier collection efficiency by modulating the tunneling effect of the hot carriers generated in the well across the barrier layer ( Raisky et al., 1998 and Varonides and Spalletta, 2009). Presently, III–V group wide band-gap materials are considered as

Genocide Essay

1639 words - 7 pages been deprived of their rights through the act of genocide. Genocide is defined as the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group. At the common read lecture about genocide what I learned about was the eight stages of genocide, which are classification, symbolism, dehumanization, organization, polarization, preparation, extermination, and denial. In this essay I will further discuss the eight stages of genocide

Small Groups and Mourning

1183 words - 5 pages was mourned by them. But in the other hand with the astronauts we only saw the reactions of the Americans and how they were missed. Group polarization can also be a factor when it comes to mourning. Group polarization is how people interact with other to form opinions. Polarization is how well a person can integrate with another group and still give their true opinion without having to worry about the consequences. “Sociologist have documented

Polarization in the Political System

2334 words - 9 pages cooperation and compromise necessary for the government to function. As the United States becomes more extreme in its beliefs in general, group polarization and competition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of goal attainment, will lead to more "showdown" situations in which the goal of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering.In this paper I will analyze recent political behavior in terms of two factors: Group behavior with

Environmental harmony

1114 words - 5 pages Administrators). Nor would the United States Fish and Wildlife Service be responsible for enforcing federal wildlife laws, and distributing money to states' fish and wildlife agencies through the Wildlife Sport Fish and Restoration program. It is apparent that if the diverse group of environmentalist were to combine activism in the nation would increase. As a result of this direct polarization between local and national organizations, the environmental

testt

7757 words - 31 pages competitive environment. Hence the umbrella term academics use to describe this work: the resource- based view of the fi rm (RBV). The RBV combines the internal analysis of phe- nomena within companies (a preoc- cupation of many management gurus since the mid-1980s) with the external analysis of the industry and the competi- tive environment (the central focus of earlier strategy approaches). Thus the resource-based view builds on, but does not

Identity Loss: Polarized Expertise & Fragmented Media

2297 words - 10 pages longer and more loyally. This shows how experts are dictating what the masses are watching and believing and also aligning the masses views with their ideologies. However, it also demonstrates how polarization creates inequalities in policy education from the masses of each political spectrum and, therefore, trust. Since the media’s willingness to go to “enormous and expensive lengths” to study public interest, it has proven to the media that it

Does the Public Have Unrealistic Expectations for the Presidency?

1860 words - 7 pages time of increased political polarization than doing so when the Senate is controlled by the opposite party or when neither party has a significant majority in the Senate. During this age of increased political polarization it is difficult for the president to pass any major piece of legislation when the his party does not control both houses of the Senate because parties are more unified and less willing to compromise on their ideals (Wayne 2012

Are the U.S. parties getting stronger or weaker? Is this a positive or a negative development for the American system?

1403 words - 6 pages . After Reconstructions, parties were starting to gain in strength, but after 1910 it began to crumble when a group of progressive Republicans joined with a minority Democratic faction to overthrow the Speaker of the House at the time, Joseph Cannon (NY Times). During much of the next half-century, the two-party system continued unraveling, and in the 1960s the two-party system reached a very weak point in the American system. The parties were very

Similar Essays

Group Polarization And Competi Essay

2354 words - 9 pages cooperation and compromise necessary for the government to function. As the United States becomes more extreme in its beliefs in general, group polarization and competition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of goal attainment, will lead to more "showdown" situations in which the goal of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering. In this paper I will analyze recent political behavior in terms of two factors: Group behavior

Group Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior

2102 words - 8 pages incompatible with the cooperation and compromise necessary for the government to function. As the United States becomes more extreme in its beliefs in general, group polarization and competition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of goal attainment, will lead to more "showdown" situations in which the goal of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering. In this paper I will analyze recent political behavior in terms of

Group Polarization And Competitioning Political Behavior

2099 words - 8 pages andcompromise necessary for the government to function. As the UnitedStates becomes more extreme in its beliefs ingeneral, group polarization and competition, which requires a mutualexclusivity of goal attainment, will lead to more'showdown' situations in which the goal of good government gives way topolitical posturing and power-mongering.In this paper I will analyze recent political behavior in terms of twofactors: Group behavior with an emphasison

Is Political Polarization Good Or Bad For American Politics And Government?

1058 words - 5 pages Thomas Mann of Brookings Institutions writes that, “in addition to the decline in competition, American politics today is characterized by a growing ideological polarization between the two major parties”. In addition to his opinion, political data has shown that political polarization is increasing and is more readily seen in the way the American government functions in the political sphere. In an article by the University of Rochester’s Campus