This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Gruinard Island: Weapon Of Mass Destruction

1260 words - 5 pages

Gruinard Island is just one metaphoric piece of debris left over from the fallout and effects of Germany during World War 2 (WW2). This is just another testimony to the underappreciated fear of the invisible killer, the quiet storm and the science of the dragon’s breath also know as Weapons of Mass Destruction. This example is played out on the island of Gruinard merely a proving ground in fear of Germany’s biological program.

Gruinard Island
“Anthrax Island” an unsettling silence always follows whenever this is spoken. To think of such a place leaves you to envision an unnerving isolated floating rock of lifelessness. Gruinard Island is an oval-shaped Scottish island approximately 2 kilometers (1.2 miles) long by 1 kilometers (.62 miles) wide about 520-acre. Located in the Gruinard bay about halfway between Gairloch and Ullapool its closest point to the mainland is about 1 mile off the western coast of Scotland. This quaint piece of land was selected by British Military scientists from Porta Down in 1941 during World War 2 (WW2) as a testing ground for Anthrax. The scientist wanted to know the feasibility of an attack using anthrax via ground or air. Types of dispersion and how it would affect people, animals and vegetation if exposed, they also wanted to test their personal vulnerability and the viability of attacking Germany with a British Bio Weapon. This information was very valuable at the time due to the known threats coming from Germany at the time. They wanted to plan response plans and prepare for the worst case. The use of this land was primarily due to its isolation, the rugged mountain and constant offshore were not the best fit for overall control of downwind hazards. The island was split into halves, one side was designated as clean and the other was designated as dirty. Sheep were used as the test subject for the experiments. They were chosen due to the particular sensitivity to anthrax and because small animals like sheep were easy to move using a sheepdog. The sheep were kept off the island on only brought onto the island for testing.
Testing
At the time most locals had some idea of what was going on but never were formally told of the test and detailed information. Testing started in 1942 two expedition trial bombs was fired and in the summer of 1943 four additional bombs were also tested. The sheep that were tested needed to be covered due to the test, the scientist wanted to insure they did not farther spread contamination and also to set a time exposed. The sheep were placed in a four sided plastic incasing to prevent any other part of the body being exposed and possibly causing secondary contamination. The scientist will chart all information over sixty sheep were used and exposed to anthrax. Harrison (2001) Not all precautions taken by the scientist were effective there are stories of how the dead sheep were dumped in a cave on the island and buried under tons of rocks, but one of the sheep’s carcasses was washed out...

Find Another Essay On Gruinard Island: Weapon of Mass Destruction

Technological Developments on Weapons of Mass Destruction

1003 words - 4 pages Greeks - not to mention their enemies the Trojans."Even the rulers of ancient India used any means necessary in the Arthashastra, the Brahman military strategist advised the use of poison.The Hittites back in 1500 BC used plague victims to the land of the enemies.The expression Weapons of Mass Destruction originally came from Robert Whealey, in the London Times in 1937 describing a German air force attack in Spain, on the town of Guernica and killing

Weapons of Mass Destruction: Problems or Solutions?

1610 words - 7 pages ? We must all learn the dangers of weapons of mass destruction to decide which side to stand up for. Government and Military strength has always decided which countries are the best in the world. Now with drones, the development of lasers, and nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, every modern organization is a credible threat. Our way of life is balancing on a gymnast's beam. A big enough push could topple us over the edge. Nuclear power is

Chemical Weapons: Weapons of Mass Destruction

652 words - 3 pages Chemical weapons, devices used for the sole purpose of hurting or killing humans, are widely considered one of the four types of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Chemical weapons are devices that spread a certain toxic chemical to incapacitate people. The two most dangerous kinds of chemical weapons are nerve agents and vesicant, or blister, agents. Types There five kinds of chemical agents. Lethal, Incapacitating agents, Riot control gases

Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism

2283 words - 9 pages The whole world is just waiting for the one country, whether it is China, Russia, or North Korea, to set off a nuclear missile that would start a nuclear war and that would only end when there are few survivors left. However, maybe there is another way that a war could have an extreme number of casualties on every continent. The United States Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism believes that

This is about weapons of mass destruction including anthrax etc

1496 words - 6 pages Weapons of Mass DestructionChemical and Biological Warfare, use of harmful or deadly chemical or biological agents as weapons of war. These agents can kill many people and are considered weapons of mass destruction. Chemical weapons are made up of poisonous chemical compounds, whereas biological weapons are living microorganisms. Toxin weapons contain poisonous chemical products of living organisms and are sometimes classified separately

Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile

3811 words - 15 pages Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile Mitigation, to the dismay of some, has become publicly synonymous with notions of preservation and conservation. Mitigation is neither the ‘preservation’ nor is it the ‘conservation’ of habitat. Mitigation is the creation of new habitat, or the guarding of an existing habitat to "make up" for the destruction of similar habitat somewhere else. It was the infamous environmental buzz

Disarment, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Outer Space: Mongolia´s Stand

1504 words - 7 pages The topics before the First Committee are: Relationship between Disarmament and Development, Measures to prevent Terrorists from acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction, Prevention of arms Race in Outer Space. Mongolia is dedicated to collaborative

Nuclear Energy: Substitution for Oil or a Possible Source of Mass Destruction

2333 words - 9 pages all propositions and to grab an attention. The expanding of the nuclear industry seems to be the most offered. This type of energy is considered very efficient, productive, and much cheaper than other types. However, the possibility of nuclear energy becoming the source of mass destruction instead of a substitution for oil should make the world look at the problem much closer and to think twice.Nuclear radiation was discovered more than hundred

Gruinard Island Biological Warfare Testing

1228 words - 5 pages biological weapon. He was quoted as saying, “Why should the devil have all the good weapons?” Inhabitants on the mainland, a half a mile from Gruinard Island, were uninformed of the danger of the anthrax field testing. They believed it was just great fun and some kind of military exercise. People wanted to show their patriotism during the war and didn't even think about complaining. Authorities were not oblivious to local feelings. A carcass of

Preventing Terrorist Attacks

4014 words - 17 pages Weapons of Mass Destruction After the success of the September 11th attacks, al-Qaeda stepped up their rhetoric and began to specifically discuss the desire to acquire and use Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD's) against targets within the United States (Howard & Forest, 2013). In a letter addressed to the U.S. State Department, al-Qaeda leader Abu Musab al Suri, notes that WMD's are the great equalizer between the much smaller al

Comment Winston Churchill

618 words - 2 pages of Germany unsuitable for human habitation. More alarming was their inability to decontaminate Gruinard Island. Once the anthrax spores were there, they were impossible to remove (Rosenberg, 24). His change of tack to use of poison gas instead when he wrote to his Chiefs of Staff and he said that he needed a cold-blooded calculation made after of how it would pay us to use poison gas, and later on approved anthrax to be used for an initial

Similar Essays

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay

795 words - 4 pages Weapons Of Mass Destruction Weapons of mass destruction are the most powerful weapons ever created. Weapons of mass destruction are a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread annihilation. But according to United States law it also fits in many other weapons in to an extremely broad description of weapons. Nuclear weapons are a major crisis in today’s world as seen in the cold war can cause tensions to rise

Chemical And Biological Weapons Of Mass Destruction

1536 words - 7 pages project. Approved by Winston Churchill; soon anthrax, botulism, tularemia, and brucellosis toxins became weaponized. Gruinard Island in Scotland became poisoned with anthrax for 48 years (Prasad, S.K. 2009). The USA followed suite to produce such BW and tested in Utah (Guillemin, J 2006). Japan did the worst form of BW research, tested on humans-prisoners (Williams, Peter; Wallace, David 1989). Japan also used BW against China. During the cold war

Weapons Of Mass Destruction And Risk Galore

1338 words - 6 pages presence continues to threaten the world as they lead to immense risk in relation to peace, security and the survival of mankind. One of the most well-known weapons, the atom bomb, has the potential, due to its explosive power, to threaten harmony and safety as can be seen in history through the events of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As described by the US army, the atom bomb is a weapon of mass destruction which has an explosive energy equivalent to

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Are Bad

2261 words - 9 pages Should Weapons of Mass Destruction be stopped from being created because of the harm that they do or continue to be created for their use in protecting society? This question continues to bother American’s daily. Weapons of Mass Destruction are weapons that are used to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release of toxic or poisonous chemicals. It’s also a weapon that is used to release radiation or radioactivity at a level