Gun Control Is Not Losing Your Target In The Recoil

2475 words - 10 pages

Guns, like many other issues of the day, have two distinct and opposing views with many people in the middle or undecided. Even following the tragic events of December 7, 1993, when unemployed handyman Colin Ferguson boarded the LIR’s 5:33 out of Penn Station. Ferguson waited until the train, filled with local commuters on their way home, pulled out of the Hicksville station before drawing a 9mm pistol. Ferguson then opened fire walking up and down the aisle shooting passangers indiscriminately, stopping only to reload, twice. When he was finished six were dead and 19 were injured.
Gun control advocates think that outlawing guns would have stopped the killings from ever happening. While gun rights advocates believe just as strongly that it could have been stopped by one innocent person being armed and fighting back. In order for an issue to even be at hand, both sides must agree that there is a problem with guns and gun control. Both gun control and pro gun advocates do agree that there is a problem. Pro gunners say it is too hard to own a gun and the gun controllers say it is too easy to get a gun.
Gun control advocates would argue that gun ownership is not a right and is not protected by the second amendment. They further believe guns are harmful to society. Gun control advocates also believe guns are not needed for self-defense. Gun-controllers use points such as, the constitution, specifically the second amendment, hunting and gun related assaults to try to prove their point; however most of their arguments are based in emotions and only have merit in the specific case they are trying to illustrate. For when you strip away the emotional rhetoric and examine issues logically, so called gun control laws fail to accomplish any of their stated goals.
A lawyer once said, "If the facts are with you, argue the facts. If the facts are against you, argue the law." Now gun control advocates have added, “If the facts and the law are against you, argue the emotions!” Let us start this discussion with the simplest and strongest argument for gun rights. This argument comes to us from the very foundation of our great nation, the Constitution.
On December 15, 1791, the new United States of America adopted the Bill of Rights the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, affirming the fundamental rights of its citizens. The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, speech, and the press, and the rights of peaceful assembly and petition. The second amendment says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
The importance of this right to the framers of the constitution and the founding fathers could not be clearer, as it spells out in the foundation document of their new nation that they hold this right to be no less important than the freedom of speech.
Much has been made by the gun control advocates of the phrase “a well-regulated...

Find Another Essay On Gun Control is NOT Losing your Target in the Recoil

Why I Think Gun Control Is not effective.

568 words - 2 pages the wrong image about the Rhino Bullets.We are slowly having our rights taken away because people would rather be safe than have freedom. If we keep giving more and more freedom their will be no freedoms. If the common people have no guns or ammo the only groups who will have guns will be the criminals and the law enforcement so who is going to protect you from the criminals when the law enforcement can not come that instant. That is why gun control is bad.

America Needs Criminal Control, Not Gun Control

1935 words - 8 pages criminals with extensive criminal backgrounds to return to live among society. While a case can easily be made to improve/enforce existing gun control laws, it is key to point out that criminals are criminals due to the fact that they do not follow laws, whereas law-abiding citizens do. There is no reason why a law-abiding citizen should be forced to accept a system that would allow someone convicted of murder the chance to get out of prison after

The 2nd Amendment Does Not allow Gun Control

3696 words - 15 pages to this right citing it whenever there is objection for which they say this right which allows for. This individual right is consistently held up as self evident, so why would the right granted by the 2nd Amendment be any different? Gun control advocates and laws have attempted to pawn off 2nd Amendment rights as something that was never intended to belong to the individual and in doing so have infringed on American’s rights, all the while

Gun Control Will Not Reduce Crime

1367 words - 5 pages constitutional right. This would have a positive effect and limit the amount of unregistered firearms in America’s streets. Another possible solution to gun control is to require all gun owners to have a license, and take a course on gun ownership with the police department. This would limit the problem of crime and gun related accidents. Rivkin explains how a majority of gun related accidents last year were from people who did not understand how

Gun Control Laws Will NOT Reduce Crime

2339 words - 9 pages “I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it”. -- Clint Eastwood This nation was built on the right to bear arms, but this freedom is more controversial than ever. With all the school shootings and gun violence in America today at some point it may seem that just too take away all guns may be the answer to this problem. In defense, this is not the answer. If someone wants to commit a crime

America Does Not Need Gun Control

1318 words - 5 pages citizens have turned in their firearms while others no longer carry them out of the house, or carry their handguns about in a locked case in their car (where they are about as useful a means for defense as butter for cutting granite). Clearly, the law is only a restriction upon those who obey it. Another problem is deciding whether or not gun control laws are even, well, lawful. This is not as cut and dried as it may seem because it is not enough

Gun Control Laws Will NOT Reduce Crime

1777 words - 7 pages guns would lower crime rates and they are just not feasible. The National Academy of Science issued a 328-page report that found there is no link between gun control and lower crime rates. As shown in the United Kingdom, Jamaica, and Ireland gun control bans can increase violent crimes. In Jamaica after the handgun ban in 1974, the murder rate “soared to become the highest in the world”, as stated by Robert Levy (3). It has been said, people

Gun Controls Do Not Control Criminals

1038 words - 4 pages Gun Control Does Not Control Criminals   "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights, Article II). This seemingly simple phrase is probably the source of more debate and argument than any other single sentence in American history. The argument is not black and white, rather, it encompasses many shades of gray. At the one

Gun Control Does Not Reduce Crime

1248 words - 5 pages any further I'll pretend like it is necessary to give a brief background on my stance on guns in general. I've never owned a gun, and don't really have any strong desire to own one. On the other hand I was in the Marines for 4 years and certainly am not uncomfortable around guns (I literally slept with a rifle for 22 days straight). I am opposed to gun laws as I believe the largest threat to our society is government itself. A well armed

America Does NOT Need Gun Control

2516 words - 10 pages , despite the claims of gun control activists, gun control does not reduce crime, it only leaves law abiding citizens increasingly vulnerable to violent crime.      One common claim of gun control advocates is that gun control in foreign countries, notably Great Britain, is responsible for their lower crime rates. They present statistics showing that Britain has lower murder rates than America, but skip some other interesting information

America Needs Gun Education, Not Gun Control Laws

2287 words - 9 pages to guns. This method only infringes on the basic and most significant of all American rights, the right to keep and bear arms, as defined in the second amendment. It also takes guns from honest law abiding citizens and puts them in the hands of the criminals committing these crimes. The only effective way to reduce gun crime and unnecessary gun deaths is through education, not more gun control legislation. This education should begin at the

Similar Essays

Gun Control In Canada. Speaks Of How Gun Control Is Not In The Best Interest Of Society

2657 words - 11 pages An increase in gun control is not in the best interests of society, it just provides a false sense of security. Through out history governments have used guns as a scapegoat for their problems with violent crime. Guns are not the problem when it comes to society's problems with violence, people are. Guns do not commit the crimes people do. You must control the criminals in order to control crime.The history of gun control in Canada has had a

Gun Control Is Not Crime Control

949 words - 4 pages Gun Control is not Crime Control Americans are faced with an ever-increasing problem of violence. The streets of America are now a war zone. Teenage gangsters murder one another for drug territory, and innocent victims are caught in the crossfire. However, most recent and most abhorrent, is our children are killing one another. They are killing with extreme prejudice. Our children are killing, exhibiting little or no remorse for lives they

Gun Control Is Not The Answer To High Murder Rates

1740 words - 7 pages , all small scale. As the size of the gun control area is increases, however, there are no improvements in the results. Two prime examples of this are the bans that were set in Washington, DC, and Chicago. The Chicago handgun ban set in place in 1982, kept the civilians from owning any handgun that had not been registered before the law was in place. It also required that the guns must be registered again every two years, a requirement that was

Commonsense Control, Not Gun Control Essay

1281 words - 5 pages . They want a ban on all firearms. But that is not the solution, the solution is the education of every person that purchases a firearm and required trigger locks, and stricter compliance by judges to the sentences mandated for crimes involving firearms.The 'most recent attempt at federal gun legislation was the Gun Control Act of 1968' (Goldwater 183) and has done little if anything to lower the number of crimes committed using firearms. In fact