Gun Control Laws Take Guns Away From Law Abiding Citizens

1347 words - 5 pages

Gun control is a very big issue in the United States today. Many people don't agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns away from law-abiding citizens. Many people have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns are not very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection. The second amendment states "the right to bear arms" does this grant everyone a right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for a good guy to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea.
Gun control only takes guns away from law- abiding citizens and it does nothing to stop criminals from buying illegal guns, who are unlikely to obey the law and register their guns (Long 45). In many cases the term gun control is improperly used. The definition of gun control is; government regulation of possession and use of firearms by private citizens (Zimring 23). The government is using it as way to take our right to bear arms.
There are many reasons that people want to own a gun. One of the main reasons that people own a gun is protection. In a survey given about guns, " self defense" was the primary reason for owning a gun (Nisbet 114). Guns provide a great source of psychological reassurance even among citizens who are not especially concerned about the fear of crime of being victimized (Long 53). The right of self-defense and the right to use firearms for defense of self and family are the cornerstone of individual rights enumerated in the U.S. constitution (Nisbet 89).
Why does the government make it harder for us to protect ourselves? Police cannot always protect everyone. There are only about 500,000 police officers throughout the country, which figures to around 125,000 police officers are on duty at any given time (Long 46). Other than a bodyguard or a law enforcement officer at one's side twenty-four hours a day, the most effective deterrent to criminal attack is the criminal's fear that the prospective victim is armed and prepared to defend themselves (Nisbet 14). Courts have ruled that there is no constitutional fight to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen, which means that police have no duty to protect the individual citizen (Long 55).
It is not very likely of being attacked when someone armed. Criminal's fear armed citizens. Victims who used guns for protection were less likely either to be attacked or injured than victims who responded in any other way (Long 112). According to the U.S. Justice Department victimization studies, a citizen that uses arms stands not only a greater chance of avoiding injury than his or her unarmed counter part, but also increases his or her odds of failing the criminal assault (Long 104). The police force went on strike...

Find Another Essay On Gun Control Laws Take Guns Away from Law-abiding Citizens

Gun Control Fails To Prevent Criminals From Getting Guns

1033 words - 4 pages rates, as much as by 40%, in major metropolitan areas ("Handgun crime 'up'," 2001). Much of this was attributed to the increase in gang activity and their use of firearms to commit crimes. These are the people that do not follow the letter of the law. Even though Great Britain set the world standard for gun control, they were unable to stop criminals from gaining access to firearms thus putting the law abiding citizens in greater danger than

Gun Control Laws Essay

1418 words - 6 pages Gun Control Laws Can we, “carefully controlling guns,” how many shootings at schools or malls will it take before we understand that people who intend to kill are not deterred by gun laws(Stossel)? Guns do not kill, people with the wrong mindset kill. There should not be any gun control laws, because criminals can get a gun no matter the law “money talks”; many of the gun massacres happen in gun-free zones; and when was the last time you

Controversial Gun Control Laws

1280 words - 5 pages arms shall not be infringed.” has secured certain gun rights for Americans for more than two centuries. But, over the past years, more laws have been made regarding the purchase and usage of guns. The first national gun control law didn’t take place until the 1920’s and 30’s, almost a century and a half after the second amendment was made. Also, the United States government has written a couple of controversial gun laws over the past 80

Gun Control Laws

713 words - 3 pages Many people believe that by making stricter gun laws will eliminated armed crime, they also thought that in D.C. on 1976, and when they did pass the anti-gun law armed crime erupted and the capital got the nickname of the “ Murder Capital”. Criminals won’t stop because there is a law, they will break it because thats what they do. There shouldn’t be anymore gun control laws, it is against the second Amendment to ban guns, criminals won’t stop

Undocumented Workers in the United States do not Take Away Jobs From U.S. Citizens

793 words - 3 pages -paying jobs (usually 2 dollars an hour) and that's still better then what they would receive in their homeland. Isn't that something? Some Americans say that Immigrants are taking away jobs. What American would be willing to work for 2 dollars an hour as a janitor or maid? Not many. One American women, in the video Natives: Immigrant Bashing on the Border, said "Immigrants come in the US, take away jobs from "us" and then live on welfare." Americans

Opposition to Gun Control Laws

1385 words - 6 pages bear arms. Gun control laws don’t need to be put into action, no matter how well the laws are assumed to be protecting. Although the abolition of gun control has its perks, some may argue that keeping and implementing gun control has advantages, too. For example, gun control protects: law-abiding citizens, children, and any other type of citizen from other harmful citizens, such as criminals. It keeps guns out of criminal’s hands -- especially

Gun Control Laws in Tennessee

733 words - 3 pages industry.Tennessee's gun control laws can be defined in one word: despicable. In no way are these laws strict in any way. For the two positive grades that Brady Campaign gave the state those should be guaranteed ones anyway. Nobody under 18 should be allowed to purchase a gun. Seriously even in Texas people under 18 can not buy guns. Why the state can't force gun manufacturers to put safety locks on weapons is just lack of concern for the public's well being

Gun Control Control Laws Decrease Crime

494 words - 2 pages amendment the right "to bear arms". Opponents of gun control, including the National Rifle Association, better known as the NRA, argue that the "right To bear arms" is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and licensing restrictions penalize law-abiding citizens while in no way preventing criminal use of handguns. It is also argued that by making it difficult for guns to be bought and

Law Brief on Gun Control

1844 words - 7 pages spur to the black market in firearms. If guns were to be banned, gun advocates believe that the same thing that happened in the 1920's with the prohibition of alcohol would just happen again. Honest law abiding citizens would find themselves buying guns from the black market to protect themselves. Gun control sounds like a very wise step towards ending gun related violence and crime in our country. "Every year, more than 24,000 Americans are killed

Gun Control Laws - Should They Be Altered?

624 words - 2 pages to stop gun violence. In this essay I will tell about why I believe gun control laws should not be changed. After the many shootings in schools over the past two years, many people believe guns should be made illegal for civillians to posses or purchase guns. While this may make it difficult for minors, drug addicts, and people with mental deficiencies to get hold on a gun, The Constitution allows all citizens to possess arms to defend

Gun Control Laws Will NOT Reduce Crime

1777 words - 7 pages Gun control laws aim to restrict or regulate firearms by selecting who can sell, buy and possess certain guns. Criminals do not obey laws and stricter gun control laws or banning guns will have little effect on reducing crimes. There are many myths about gun control reducing acts of gun violence, which are simply not true according to research. People are responsible for the crimes, not the guns themselves. Taking guns away from United States

Similar Essays

Gun Control: Law Abiding Citizens Should Be Permitted To Have Guns

1258 words - 5 pages Gun Control: Law Abiding Citizens Should be Permitted to Have Guns "Bleeding and weakened from the bullet wound in her chest, Susan Gonzalez aimed her husband's .22-caliber pistol, the one she hated, and emptied it into one of the robbers who had burst through the front door of her rural Jacksonville home"(Pinkham). This story shows that guns can be used to save lives. Americans have gun rights and privileges thanks to the Second Amendment

Gun Control: Opposing The Removal Of Guns From American Citizens

1730 words - 7 pages , people should be the ones that are controlled. During this decision, people from different organizations have expressed their own views and thoughts. Gun control has both positive and negative effects on U.S. citizens. Some organizations report that the removal of firearms will reduce crime rates, deaths, and injuries from guns(Handgun Control Debate). An organization known as “The Brady Center” says that the Second Amendment does not state that

Right To Bear Arms. This Essay Is About Gun Control And Some Problems With Guns. It Is Pro Guns For Law Abiding Americans

609 words - 2 pages control activists are motivated by the best of intentions. Although, their quest for a gun free society is not the route to stopping violent gun crime. The prosecution of those people who deliberately use weapons in an illegal manner is a must. While prosecuting the law-abiding companies that manufacturer guns and those private individuals who own guns, is blatantly ignoring the second amendment.The laws that exist on the books now need to be

Just Take Away Their Guns Essay

1670 words - 7 pages In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson proposes a particular method to assist gun control laws in our country. Wilson proposes that if law enforcement acquires street frisks, the possession of illegal guns will drop in numbers. Through his many methods of persuasion, Wilson’s essay is executed effectively. He shows reasoning and fairness to the opposing sides to his argument but lacks the thought to other issues, such as