This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Gun Control:Necessity, Or Infringement Of Rights?

2481 words - 10 pages

Gun Control: Necessity or infringement of rights?The debate on gun control is dominated by emotion and fear. The right to bear arms or its ban is a fundamental issue, one that involves our constitutional rights. The dispute on gun control starts with the interpretation of the second amendment which provides that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The issue turns on whether the right to bear arms represents an "individual" or "collective" right. Gun control policies attempt to regulate ownership and use of firearms. These policies include legislation on local, state and federal government level. The first attempt at gun control was The National Firearms Act in 1934 which imposed a tax on sale and transfer of machine guns and short-barrel firearms. In 1968, following the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy, the Gun Control Act was passed. It prohibits felons and the mentally ill from buying firearms and bans the sale of mail-order firearms, as well as rifles and shotguns. These and other policies are established in the attempt to reduce violence. There are those who support these legislations and those who disagree with them. Opposition of federal control is very strong. Those against it say that it will not lower the death rate related to crime, because of other weapons available. They argue that control creates problems for law-obeying citizens. They also believe that it is infringement of their constitutional rights. Those who support gun control say that restricting accessibility to firearms will save innocent lives by keeping guns from the hands of high-risk persons. They also believe that private citizens should not poses firearms because they serve no military purpose.Although most Americans support some kind of gun control, it is very hard for most of us to pick a side. It is an issue that includes all of us. Some of us own firearms; others know victims of firearm violence. Deciding to support or oppose gun control should be an educated decision.The United States have the highest levels of gun ownership among other developed nations; it also holds the record for highest gun homicide rate (" Gun Laws Work, Loopholes Don't.") This problem is closely investigated and studied by gun control advocates and its opponents. While one side tries to prove the correlation between firearms ownership and gun violence, the other side focuses its efforts towards discrediting the theory. The question that is repeatedly asked by the society is; do restricted gun ownership laws protect the public and reduce crime?According to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, they do significantly. The campaign argues that strong national laws which restrict assault ( ( require lengthy background checks, and limit access to guns by children and criminals, reduce...

Find Another Essay On Gun Control:Necessity, or infringement of rights?

Should Canadian government have the right to withhold or suspend the rights of Canadian citizens in times of crisis?

901 words - 4 pages Should Canadian government have the right to withhold or suspend the rights of Canadian citizens in times of crisis?Looking back at the past that Canada strived through, there were many problems that she faced to be an independent and democratic country it is today. Times of major wars troubled internal-external affairs, sovereignty issues and national security regarding international organizations were all a part of a big crisis that put

Crime and Justice in American History- (significant court cases and laws that help or discourage the rights of criminals)

1210 words - 5 pages accused. However, the argument relents whether the U.S. system is too domineering or too soft in upholding the rights of criminals. Many believe the government has gone too far in protecting criminals and many believe the government has not gone far enough.American legal history actually begins in the early seventeenth century when the first settlers set foot on what we know today as America. With their European language and culture they also brought

Hackers are thieves who fail to comprehend and respect the rights of intellectual property owners and corporations. Argue for or against this statement

2441 words - 10 pages the various entities that reside within cyberspace. Furthermore it is important to note that for as long as corporations violate the rights of its consumers, there will be people out there, or ‘hackers’ as they might be termed, such as Matthew Skala who will use their technical skills to violate the rights of the corporation in retaliation.For some of the good that hacking may possibly bring, it is still of utmost importance that

has traditionally been defined as the illegal hunting, killing or capturing of wild animals, usually associated with land use rights

1356 words - 6 pages Everyone knows about animals going extinct, but do they know why? There are three main reasons for animals to disappear or to go extinct. The biggest reason is the black market and the trade of animals illegally. Another reason is the loss of habitat, and also poaching animals for prize, which are both caused by humans. The Black Market happens in most of Asia. Although poaching and loss of habitat happens all over the world, which the animals

The Fight Against Gun Control

1685 words - 7 pages are against strict gun control laws. Institute of medicine and the national research council says “crime victims who use guns in self defense have consistently lower injury rates than victims who use other strategies” (Cato) other strategies such as stalling, calling police, or using other weapons. “States that allow registered citizens to carry concealed weapons have lower crime rates than those that don’t.” (Lampo). That is a not very known

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in the USA

1209 words - 5 pages Americans were to purchase a gun, be trained to use the gun, and carry the gun, gun violence would begin to decrease. The second amendment was incorporated under the fourteenth in the landmark case McDonald v. Chicago. According to The Fourteenth amendment, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” Prior to this the city of Chicago had infringed upon the rights of

Differing Interpretation on 2nd Ammendment on Gun Control in U.S

986 words - 4 pages support citizen’s individual right to own guns and oppose licensing of guns, and registration of guns, as an invasion of privacy and infringement on second amendment rights. Based on the analysis it has become clear that as a nation our second amendment rights to obtain, own, and use firearms is exactly that, a right as an American. The evidence shows nations with strict anti-gun laws have higher murder rates than those with weak or no gun regulation

Gun Controls Do Not Control Criminals

1038 words - 4 pages Gun Control Does Not Control Criminals   "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights, Article II). This seemingly simple phrase is probably the source of more debate and argument than any other single sentence in American history. The argument is not black and white, rather, it encompasses many shades of gray. At the one

Intellectual Property Protection

1266 words - 5 pages patent rights is done through the United States Patent and Trademark office at Each submission is studied thoroughly by a patent examiner, who may either accept or reject the patent submission. As we now understand patents and their creation, let’s discuss patent infringement and the punishments of the infringing party along with the rewards to the infringed party. Patents are governed exclusively through federal law. Any

Guns in American History

1129 words - 5 pages a gun and due to the since that a gun can cause gravely injury there has to be laws pertaining to this matter. When traveling from one state to another the laws may vary. Many states do not recognize other states permits or licenses. In other words what might pass in one state does not pass in another state. Forty four states have a provision in their state constitution similar to the Second amendment of the Bill of Rights. When buying or

Guns Don't Kill People, People Kill People

1527 words - 6 pages eventually make it more difficult to own guns. For the NRA, an inability to own guns would be considered an infringement on Constitutional rights and in the end, make guns available to only criminals (Awesome Library). According to the NRA, the Second Amendment of the Constitution guarantees individuals the right to own and carry guns. As stated by the supreme court, in District of Columbia v. Heller, the Second Amendment protects "the individual

Similar Essays

Citizenship Of The European Union Metaphor Or Source Of Rights

4377 words - 18 pages rights. In addition to showing a complete lack of interest in the question, the responses were words to the effect of 'what???' and 'something to do with the EU'. Thus, despite frequent European inter-governmental meetings implementing new agreements or Treaty amendments, together with the poignant speeches of various foreign ministers voicing the potential that such developments hold for the people of Europe, it is submitted that a substantial

Abu Ghraib And Guantanamo Bay: The Safety Of Nations Or The Rights Of Few?

1107 words - 5 pages camps are justified or should be closed lies with two factors: The violation of human rights and the importance in gathering information to aid America’s “war on terror.” Abu Ghraib’s and Guantanamo Bay’s holding cells have been criticized for infringing on detainees’ basic rights. BR, an Abu Ghraib detainee, commented on his experience, “They accused us of planting bombs on the road and resisting American forces. I gave them the same answers and

The Patriot Act: Just Or Just A Major Violation Of Our Constitutional Rights?

1037 words - 5 pages The Patriot Act: Just or Just a Major Violation of Our Constitutional Rights?After the devastating acts of the Muslim terrorists on 9/11, the president issued an Executive order known as HR 3162, or the inaptly named "USA PATRIOT Act" (which stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism"). Or so he would have the public believe. The Patriot Act was actually an extremely

Is Frances "The Declaration Of The Rights Of Man And Of Citizens," More Democratic, Or Liberal? In The Classical Sense

528 words - 2 pages at large for their own benefit or in a majority’s best interest. Founded through analysis of the declaration are three ample examples of Democratic point of views. One of these rights however stands out from the rest; number thirteen is as follows “A common contribution being necessary for the support of the public force, and for defraying the other expenses of government, it ought to be divided equally among the members of the