This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Habeas Corpus And The Use Of Military Tribunals

3664 words - 15 pages

Habeas Corpus and the Use of Military Tribunals

In America Under the Threat of Terrorism

Introduction
It was on this date one hundred forty two years ago (April 25, 1861), that President Abraham Lincoln sent a letter to Lt. General Winfield Scott authorizing the suspension of “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus” . Lincoln had been president for less than two months and was facing, what was up to that time and arguably may still be the greatest threat to the survival of the United States since the Founding Fathers launched this “Great Experiment”. Only eleven days earlier Major Robert Anderson, the commander of the federal garrison at Fort Sumter, South Carolina, had to surrender the fort to the Confederate Army. Lincoln was reluctant to issue such an order but had done so as he faced the very real possibility that the Maryland legislature would convene and “[t]ake action to arm the people of that state against the people of the United States” .
Thus began the first of several occasions in our nation’s history where a president when faced with a “clear and present danger” to our national security has had to balance fulfilling his oath to “[p]reserve, protect and defend the Constitution…” with the “privilege” to have any detainment reviewed by a judge or magistrate of competent jurisdiction.
Problem Statement
How far may law enforcement officials go in compromising civil liberties to enhance national security? What does the Constitution say with respect to the suspension of the civil liberties in times of national emergency? How has the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the constitution with respect to the suspension of habeas corpus? Few citizens would disagree that national security is a legitimate function of government. First and foremost, our national government is responsible for the protection of life, then liberty. The most ardent champions of the Bill of Rights concede that it would be foolish to treat civil liberties as inviolable when the lives of innocent thousands are at stake. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson, dissenting in a free speech case, gave these words of warning regarding civil liberties:
“[T]he choice is not between order and liberty. It is between liberty with order and anarchy without either. There is danger that, if the Court does not temper its doctrinaire logic with a little practical wisdom, it will convert the constitutional Bill of Rights into a suicide pact.”
How then do we balance this legitimate function of government with the government’s responsibility to preserve and protect our liberty?
With the recent “war” on terrorism our government has moved to curtail and, in some cases, to deny United States citizens their constitutional rights to due process. The delicate balance between the fundamental right to the due process of law and national security is the focus of this research paper and is structured as follows:
• Introduction to Habeas Corpus
• A Brief History of...

Find Another Essay On Habeas Corpus and the Use of Military Tribunals

Habeas Corpus and War Essay

1728 words - 7 pages . In 2002 five men were arrested in Afghanistan and were held for almost six years without charges or trial. The Military Commissions Act by Bush denied the right of habeas corpus to "alien prisoners" but detainees still fought ("Habeas corpus: A," 2007). The issue came that prisoners were being transferred between different holding places without being charged ("Habeas corpus: A," 2007). Just because habeas corpus was not to be applied to enemy

Abraham Lincoln and the Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus

1000 words - 4 pages enumerated powers and violated one of the fundamental rights of the nation he was trying to preserve when he suspended the writ of habeas corpus and ignored the Supreme Court while unreasonably defending his own illegal actions. The writ of habeas corpus is perhaps the most important right a citizen possesses. Sir William Blackstone, the author of young Lincoln’s revered Commentaries on the Laws of England, said “the writ of habeas corpus [is] the

In Favor Of Military Tribunals

1552 words - 6 pages a military operation. The President has declared war on terrorism; there is no question about it. Congress gave President Bush the right to use ?all necessary force? against those who ?committed or aided? the terrorist acts (wired.com). Tribunals are a necessary force, according to the President, and these people are being detained under the suspicion that they committed and/or aided terrorist acts. The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution

In Favor Of Military Tribunals

1559 words - 6 pages foundations of liberty and democracy to destroy themselves because if the guilty are set free in this case in order to save the few innocent, than even more innocent people, people who have nothing to do with terrorism and were never suspected of such things, are in danger of becoming victims.Safety is the most important issue surrounding the use of military tribunals. Given what this group of suspects has demonstrated they are capable of doing, the global

The Military Use of Animals

1185 words - 5 pages involving these military animals has not helped the military's cause. These videos show the use of monkeys and goats in medical training which is evidence that the military is violating its own animal welfare regulations (Lawrence 1). These military's response has not helped their cause either, a former military medic responded to these videos saying that these training videos are not enough to replicate actual battle combat, but the use and training

On the Use of Military Theory

2154 words - 9 pages contemporary issues, in order to comprehend them. This use of theories is absolutely useful for soldiers, especially leaders and commanders, for it allows them, as their authors intended, to understand the challenges they face. Military leaders greatly benefit from learning theory since it offers them the intellectual tools required to analyze and understand a situation, not necessarily through a comprehensive approach, but a critical one

The Efficacy of Article 2 (4): Use of Military Force

3262 words - 13 pages action on a wide range of issues through the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council and other bodies and committees. Article 2(4) is a section of the UN Charter that specifically states that: all member states shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state or in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations. Section two is a

When is the use of military force justified ?

760 words - 4 pages The human race is no stranger to the use of military force. For numerous centuries, our ancestors engaged in warfare, resulting in the destruction of infrastructure, spilled blood, and shedding of tears. Yet, despite the great inconveniences of the use of military force, I personal believe that history has shown that military force was necessary and justified in regards to promote the welfare of others. Historical wars that will solidify my

Drug Use in the Military

662 words - 3 pages drugs once they get to MEPs, they will be given the opportunity to disclose any drug use prior to being tested and this can create a delay in their processing. All applicants are required to give a urine sample for the drug test. Once an applicant has passed the Military Entrance Processing Center screening, the applicant is explained the "zero tolerance" drug policy set forth by the Department of Defense. Once the applicant has read and understands

Drug Use in the Military

664 words - 3 pages drugs once they get to MEPs, they will be given the opportunity to disclose any drug use prior to being tested and this can create a delay in their processing. All applicants are required to give a urine sample for the drug test. Once an applicant has passed the Military Entrance Processing Center screening, the applicant is explained the "zero tolerance" drug policy set forth by the Department of Defense. Once the applicant has read and

The Effects of Modernity and the Military

1618 words - 6 pages decision could mean the end of the world. This means that the people must have trust in the abstract system of their military and government not to ever use these weapons. 'The only point of holding nuclear weapons - apart from their symbolic value in world politics - is to deter others from using them'(75). When the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) were developed it meant that a nuclear weapon could be sent across the globe to a target without

Similar Essays

We Shouldn't Use Military Tribunals For Every Terror Suspects

610 words - 3 pages . Military tribunals have enough advantages to use, and there are legitimiate uses for a military trial: trying terrorists in a military court in a place as lawless as Afganistan is one of them, but U.S government needs to guarantee, that they will not use military tribunals when everything is under control. There are too many clause for terrorist to submit to the military trilbunal. It only justifies when there are enough prooves. I hope there are no innocence victim from the military tribunal.

The Right Of Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror

1426 words - 6 pages -citizen enemy combatants to be held indefinitely in a military prison without access to a lawyer (The Rutherford Institute). Since that time the denial of habeas corpus has been challenged. Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror After the terrorist’s attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, the Bush administration launched the war on terror. The terms “illegal combatant” and enemy combatant” became popular during this campaign. Bush wanted to

Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror

1785 words - 7 pages against the United States and it is enacted by the president when the necessity arises (Habeas Corpus Act of 1863. (2009). Given that this is a mandate from the president himself courts as well as judges who have issued a writ must suspend it until the president has resumed the use of habeas corpus. The habeas Corpus is a tradition that celebrates as liberties ultimately safeguard (Fallon Jr., R. H. (2010). Liberty when referring to imprisonment

Habeas Corpus And The War On Terror

1262 words - 6 pages can also be used for other such cases as deportation, immigration, and in military commissions to name a few. During the civil war, President Abraham Lincoln suspended the Habeas Corpus and rightfully so as the constitution dictates in Clause 2. Under the Constitution, the federal government can and unquestionably suspend the privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus if the public safety requires it during the times of rebellion or invasion