Happiness as it relates to morality
The word philosophy was coined by the noble Greek men as “the love of wisdom”. In approximately 400 B.C., Greek men began to discover their unhappiness with supernatural and mythical explanations of reality-the only explanations presented to them at the era. The noblemen began to deduce that there was a coherent or logical order to the universe. Philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato and Socrates began an in-depth exploration of this theory of a rational and orderly world. Socrates was perhaps the most noble and wisest Athenian to have ever lived. He was a moral citizen on the constant quest for happiness, an conceived the term “eudaimonia”, which means happiness by nature that arises from fulfillment of our function as humans, in other words living “the god life”. Happiness and morality go hand in hand, as a good life consists of moral virtue, which standards of behavior. According to many philosophers, however, true ‘morality’ does not include selfishness or making exceptions in one’s own favor just because it suits one to do so. A vigilant execute theory test is necessary to explore the affiliations between morality and happiness, with the premise that the majority people that are moral are indeed happy, and that only moral beings can be truthfully be contented because the good soul will live well, and to live well is to be happy.
Many philosophers, as well as myself, are of the view that only moral person can truly be happy. There is some truth to that, as Haidt’s survey shows that self-reported happiest people in the United States are Orthodox Jews and Evangelical Christians. His studies show that these two groups live in an order (83 of which text). In this society as long as one abides by the strict guidelines set out for them at birth, they will cause no problems for themselves or others and prosper, thus achieving happiness.
One definition of happiness is the practice of virtue. In this sense, only the philosopher-in whom rationality reigns above all else-can achieve supreme happiness. Aristotle believed that the rational part of philosopher’s soul will lead him to his own good, and consequently the good of the entire community. The philosopher will agree to rule for the sake of the whole and producing more good or happiness than harm. This combination of ruling and philosophizing will constitute the very happiest life, that is, the life of complete moral excellence. For Aristotle, happiness for the community would be achieved by electing the most moral and rational to lead them (a philosopher).
Plato agree with Aristotle, as he declared that the just in a moral state will think and act in an absolutely impersonal way to achieve the common good. Through rationally, the philosophers will act to bring themselves and others as near as possible to a moral state, which in turn makes the society happy (Annas 322).
The concept of morality, which was earlier defined as principals of right and wrong or...