This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Hate Speech Legal, But Unnecessary

1363 words - 5 pages

Hate Speech - Legal, but Unnecessary

     While a clear and concise definition remains forthcoming, it is easier to establish what hate speech is not. Hate speech is wrong but legal in the United States of America mostly because we have the freedom of speech. But the First Amendment exists precisely to protect the most offensive and controversial speech from government suppression. In this case, people are allowed to use hate speech and not get arrested or any legal actions against them. The best way to counter obnoxious speech such as this is with more speech. Persuasion, not violence, is the solution to this problem (Jouhari).
     Hate speech has been mistakenly tied with other categories of speech both legal and illegal. One should avoid confusing hate speech with something it is not because other legal implications might come into play. Hate speech is not obscene speech. According to the guidelines of the Federal Communications Committee (FCC) for indecent speech, which define indecent speech as,
"limited to language or material that depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as much by the contemporary community standards for the broadcast means, sexual activities or organs," then hate speech is not indecent speech either (Pullma). Indecent speech should also be kept apart from the category of hate speech, which involves victimization.

     Hate speech is offensive language towards a particular group, race, gender, or religion. These include the insulting words by which their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality (Pullma).
     There is no choice but to continue tolerating intolerance, until the Constitution itself would be amended, which is an event unlikely to occur. In the meantime, individual cases and court opinions add more problems to the already growing problem called the constitutionality of hate speech. Hate speech on the Internet is one of those problems, unique, but part of the whole picture.

     I am against hate speech, but all people no matter their beliefs are entitled to freedom of speech like the next person, but this does not mean that I endorse the views they express. Its just that people should be able to be free of material on the Internet that insults them. The Internet is way most of the hate speech material is presented to the world. Like for example, such things as the beliefs the nazis that of Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, etc.

     Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. had an interesting statement in his Letter from Birmingham Jail that pertains to...

Find Another Essay On Hate Speech - Legal, but Unnecessary

Should Hate Speech be Regulated?

1840 words - 8 pages unnecessary regulations on hate speech would anger some people causing riots to occur. A more recent example is the case of Brown v Board of Education. In this case Brown, a father, wanted his child to attend a white school, but since they were black the child could not attend. The African- American society was split, with many saying that integration must occur and the other saying that segregation is safer. The Caucasian society had similar views on the

We Must Regulate Hate Speech

765 words - 3 pages Discourse? (173), author Susan Gellman, wrote ?Sticks and Stones Can Put You in Jail, But Can Words Increase Your Sentence?? (176), and also Henry Louis Gates Jr., author of ?Lat Them Talk? (182). McMaster believes fully in the right of the first amendment and that it should not be gone against. He believes that if hate speech is regulated then the first amendment is violated. I do agree with McMaster on this one stand point but it is not enough to

The Problems with Hate Crime Legislation

1961 words - 8 pages of the defendant should be limited. Hate crimes involve a large number of victims therefore it is clear that the defendant should be restricted of his actions. For example hate speech, someone may keep their views to them selves but as soon as they are imposing them on others they are committing a crime, discriminating against a group therefore causing harm to the community as a whole. Consequently under Mills principle it is justifiable to

Hate Speech

1244 words - 5 pages speech.” The two words that are stressed from this quote is no law. Obviously the writers of the constitution were trying to protect the future generation from losing power to their freedom of speech. But, because of the vagrant misuse of speech that we have in the world today, has everyone looking for a way to censor it. Should this type of speech be defended? No I do not think that this type of speech should be defended, because hate speech

Philosophy paper

1557 words - 7 pages Inhibition of one's liberty, such as their liberty of conscience (i.e. freedom of speech), is unjust by Millian principles, unless the person's use of deliberation is to voice hate speech. So what is hate speech? Hate speech is directed towards a member of a group, or the group as a whole, that vilifies on the basis of the subject's beliefs. In comparison to discriminatory speech, hate speech does not invoke mere offense, but in most cases is

Offensive Speech Should be Allowed

2716 words - 11 pages implementing speech codes into campus legal systems in order to control such displays. However, this is an inadequate and superficial response to a much deeper issue. College campuses should not regulate hate speech because such regulations violate our constitutional rights, no practical definition of hate speech exists, and there is no way to enforce punishment. Abridging freedom of speech on college campuses bandages the internal wound caused by racism

Hate Groups on the Internet

3829 words - 15 pages creating federal mandate” (Control of the…). Therefore it is the responsibility not only from the government, but the parents as well need to monitor what their children are viewing. ORGANIZATIONS FIGHTING ONLINE HATE There are various campaigns that support free speech through the Internet and also feel that it should be protected. For instance, we have the Green Ribbon Campaign who believe that “the idea that people themselves should be

Should Hate Groups Be Allowed Free Speech?

927 words - 4 pages of speech cannot be denied. These words may convey a seemingly immoral sense of prejudice, but it is wrong to censor them unless they instigate violence. Only then would hate speech directly lead to hate crime, which is punishable by law. Instead of criminalizing views seen as morally wrong, education that promotes acceptance and tolerance should be given as a means of prevention rather than punishment. In this way, people can develop their own

We Must Put and End to Hate Speech on Campus

3903 words - 16 pages Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). (n.d.). New Report: 59% of campuses maintain severe speech restrictions – but that’s actually an improvement. Retrieved from Gould, J. B. (2001). The precedent that wasn't: College hate speech codes and the two faces of legal compliance. Law & Society Review, 35(2), 345-392. Retrieved from http://search.

The Vitality of a Speech Code at Berry College

1019 words - 4 pages College Mission and Purpose). In order to effectively build character among all students, Berry College must not only ban hate speech for the benefit of victims but also encourage morality in all students involved. Hate speech creates an unsafe learning environment for students because of the extent of the physical, mental, and emotional harm caused to victims as well as social repercussions. As Mari Matsuda elaborates on in her Public Response to

Free Speech Zones

2317 words - 10 pages banning the group from campus… However, [the school] remains silent on the issue” (Lukianoff, 2007). While free speech issues often maintain focus upon the activists, particularly with the topic of hate speech, there are plenty of instances in which colleges and universities blatantly cross the line of what is and is not constitutional. Discussion: Free speech codes generally perceived as a threat to our constitutional rights, but they exist on

Similar Essays

Hate Speech

2274 words - 10 pages . The right to speak up stretches across many topics, but not all of them are the kindest. Hate speech is a protected form of free speech, which is controversial amongst many because of its inherently hateful nature. In fact, some people argue it should not be protected under the first amendment at all. If hate speech is to be made illegal however, it would lead to the censorship of society as whole, and would be reminiscent of the days of Hitler

On The Issue Of Hate Speech

1527 words - 7 pages incitement to hatred primarily against a group of persons defined in terms of race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, religion, sexual orientation, and the like" (“Hate Speech Law & Legal Definition” Throughout history, American society has been intertwined with such speech directed towards several groups, such as African Americans, Asians, and other immigrant groups. In 1969, Clarence Brandenburg, a leader of the KKK in

Freedom Of Speech In America And Its Limits

2983 words - 12 pages fundamental human rights. Hence, as acknowledged through natural rights, other rights and personhood should adamantly be included within this scope of this protection. Hate speech is a limit on free speech, as it not only puts the victim under deliberate psychological and physical harm, but also silences them, and hence to prevent hate speech one needs to foster free speech. Freedom of Speech is a human right. It is an extension of our

The Epidemic Of Hate Crimes In America

3664 words - 15 pages Amendment, there is a difference between speaking freely and speaking with intent of malice on a person or body of people. The development of the Internet has made it difficult for moderators to control hate speech on the web, and has allowed hate groups to bypass reforms erected by the government. Codifying laws on hate crime would stem to hate speech eventually. Classifying hate speech has been a touchy subject, but if it were to be defined, hate would