Heart Of Darkness Versus Apocalypse Now: The Death Of Kurtz

857 words - 3 pages

Heart of Darkness Versus Apocalypse Now: The Death of Kurtz
Joseph Conrad wrote Heart of Darkness to disguise his disapproval of European imperialism in the Congo. He describes the chaos and savagery found in the Congo to convince Europeans that they should stay out of Africa. Francis Ford Coppola made Apocalypse Now to disguise his disapproval of American involvement in Vietnam. He depicts the merciless slaughter of countless Vietnamese to show Americans that the United States does more harm than good in Vietnam. In each instance, the creator’s country claims one goal, but accomplishes something entirely different when in battle. Marlow and Willard face the corruption, personified by Kurtz, differently, but both Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now explore the convictions of the human heart when faced with evil.
Although they both obsess over finding Kurtz, they act out of two completely different motives. Marlow, a curious seaman, procures a job with a shipping company, so he can explore the old “blank spaces” on his childhood map, not because he wants to stop Kurtz’s mad reign. Willard, a hardened soldier, travels to Vietnam planning to kill Kurtz and end his corruption. Marlow plans to help Kurtz and wants to help him recover from his mental breakdown. Willard, on the other hand, watches Kurtz in bewilderment and despises his madness. Conrad shows that Marlow cares about Kurtz by revealing Marlow’s curiosity in their conversations on the boat. Coppola creates Kurtz’s sanctum as a sullen cellar where Willard waits in bewilderment as Kurtz’s madness fills the air like the smoke that surrounds him. Although their techniques are different, Conrad and Coppola show the intense internal struggle that Marlow and Willard, two separate points on the social spectrum, face when confronting Kurtz.
Marlow and Willard have different missions, but their decisions both result in Kurtz’s death. In Heart of Darkness, Marlow recovers Kurtz body but not his mind, so he dies slowly, on the way back to Europe, but in Apocalypse Now, Willard accomplishes his mission by killing Kurtz directly, slashing him at the same time the natives slash the bull. Conrad juxtaposes Marlow’s mental deviation with Kurtz’s corporal decay in order to show that corruption spreads if not tamed. Willard’s sanity also deviates while under the hypnotic spell of Kurtz, but Coppola shows that temptation can be overcome by allowing Willard to break free of Kurtz’s spell and quell his evil reign forever. When isolated, a corrupt heart withers away...

Find Another Essay On Heart of Darkness Versus Apocalypse Now: The Death of Kurtz

Apocalypse Now and Heart of Darkness

1546 words - 6 pages . Apocalypse Now clearly draws heavily on Marlow’s mission to form Willard’s. The movie also draws from Marlow’s drive to find Kurtz just so he can hear his voice. In Heart of Darkness Marlow realizes that one thing he wanted more than anything else was to speak to Kurtz “I couldn’t have been more disgusted if I had travelled all this way for the sole purpose of talking with Mr. Kurtz. Talking with…I flung one shoe overboard, and became aware that that

Comparing Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now

4316 words - 17 pages Parallels in Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now         In the interpretation and comparison of Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now there begins to unfold a list of similarities that can be linked to Arturian legend, particularly the quest of the grail. Marlow, or Willard can be viewed as the knight who has been sent on a mythic quest, the specific task being the recovery or assassination of Kurtz, the mythic god-man linked to the

Elements of Darkness in Apocalypse Now and Heart of Darkness

1284 words - 5 pages the film and the book but each tells the story in a different and unique way.      The basic plots of "Apocalypse Now" and "Heart of Darkness" are very similar. Both films have a main character that makes a journey down a long and winding river to find a man name Kurtz. In the film the protagonist is a Special Forces captain named Willard, in the book he is called Marlow. The film seems to have a more direct plot as Willard is sent by his

Varying Interpretations of Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now

2657 words - 11 pages , disturbing, and memorable dealing with the insanity of war and the indifference of emotions in men in Apocalypse Now. Several crew members are killed along the way in both instances. Kurtz's village is decorated and portrayed in similar manners. A major difference is that in Apocalypse Now, Willard kills Kurtz but in Heart of Darkness, he suffers a natural death. In Apocalypse Now, Willard does not return to the United States to meet Kurtz's wife

Apocalypse Now As An Interpretation Of Heart Of Darkness

1253 words - 5 pages , and we can clearly see the relationship between the characters of Kurtz in these two pieces. We can also see the parallel between Marlow and Willard, Marlow , from Conrad's Heart of Darkness, and Willard, from Coppola's Apocalypse Now and there relationship with Kurtz.As high Army generals and the manager of this Ivory trade both feel that control of Kurtz has been lost and something has to be done about it. This is where Marlow and Willard are

Comparative Essay of Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now

1035 words - 4 pages Comparative Essay of Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now The ties between Joseph Conrad's book, “Heart of Darkness” and Francis Coppola's movie, “Apocalypse Now” are unmistakable. Apocalypse Now's correctness in following the story line of the Heart of Darkness is amazing although the settings of each story are from completely different location and time periods. From the jungle of the Congo in Africa to the Nung river in Vietnam

Transformation in Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now

1711 words - 7 pages himself urged the extermination of the brutes at the end of Heart of Darkness, the word "exterminate" is again used in Apocalypse Now, but near the beginning, to forcefully describe Willard's mission which is to kill Kurtz. In this way, this aspect of Apocalypse Now may be considered as a continuation of where Conrad had ended his 1899 narrative. Willard's transformation appears to be similar to Marlow's since Willard chooses not to replace Kurtz

Heart of Darkness, Hollow Men, and Apocalypse Now

1407 words - 6 pages Apocalypse Now Coppola incorporates the character Mr. Kurtz. Coppola gets the character of Kurtz from Conrad's Heart of Darkness. In Heart of Darkness Kurtz is this European man who leaves Europe with an empty idealism which collapsed under the force of the savage and barbaric darkness. He visits the Congo and is transformed into this man of the jungle. The character of Kurtz is similar in Apocalypse Now; he is a highly decorated general in the

Savagery in Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now

881 words - 4 pages ; Although the Europeans believed they had reached the height of civilization, remnants remained of their own savagery.  Throughout the novel Heart of Darkness there is reference to the idea of civility versus savagery - this is also true of the movie Apocalypse Now.         Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness shows the disparity between the European ideal of civilization and the reality of it, displayed by

Heart of Darkness, Apocalypse Now, and Hollow Men

1389 words - 6 pages the Valkuries" is played.             The character of Kurtz in Apocalypse Now, like Kurtz in Heart of Darkness, is the hollow man. He is the shell, the empty façade, of civilization. This is made all the more clear by the fact that he has headquartered himself in what seems to be an ancient temple, a symbol not only of the civilization he is fighting, but of "civilization" itself. Yet, though Kurtz and his followers are living in a temple

Racism in "Heart of Darkness" and "Apocalypse Now".

643 words - 3 pages The book "Heart of Darkness" and the movie "Apocalypse Now" are two works dealing with deep issues of evil. (Beyond imperialism, because the evil of imperialism has a root. For example, crack the nut) They refer places boiling down to a discussion of racism. The Thames River as in any mythology is a source of life. At the end, Marlow comes upon Kurtz's Intended and said, "An object of the fecund". Also, these two works deal with how a man is

Similar Essays

Heart Of Darkness Versus Apocalypse Now

601 words - 2 pages darkness. Both the main characters, Marlow in Heart of Darkness and Willard in Apocalypse Now, go through basically the same change when they go on their missions. Their missions differ, but as each gets closer and closer to their targets, they find themselves much like the people they are supposed to be stopping. This is the theme that provides us with the moral value. When the stories begin, we think that Kurtz is not good and we just cannot

"Heart Of Darkness" And "Apocalypse Now"

1372 words - 5 pages authority in both Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now eventually causes him to become ruthless. Many tribes of natives adore Kurtz and obey his every command. Kurtz appears to have become a god of the people. As Marlow approaches Kurtz's place of refuge, described as the shack of the "universal genius" (359) by the natives. Dead bodies litter the area leaving the foul stench of death around his camp. Marlow hears rumors of Kurtz's unusual behavior

Heart Of Darkness Vs. Apocalypse Now

924 words - 4 pages Marlow in Heart of Darkness. The strength of Kurtz is carried out through the authority pronounced through his profound voice. Coppola creates an overpowering tone through Kurtz, by displaying the savagery that has engulfed him. Though Kurtz character is calm during the scene, his barbaric nature portrays an intense power. In both Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now, both authors develop the scene in order to highlight the evolution of

Appropriation: Heart Of Darkness Apocalypse Now

1943 words - 8 pages Vietnam campaign was to preserve the Southern Vietnamese's right to freedom. Heart of Darkness portrays Kurtz death by natural causes, as a result of the horrors of the Congo.The inclusion of Kurtz's famous final line, "The Horror! The Horror!" in "Apocalypse Now" alters the meaning of this phrase in the narrative. In "Heart of Darkness", the meaning of this line is intentionally left ambiguous, allowing the responder to read as far into its meaning