Henry: An Ideal Monarch? Essay

1495 words - 6 pages

Henry: An Ideal Monarch?

In the 1590s, there was a very strict ideal of a Monarch. The way an
ideal Monarch would be viewed in the 1590s was not far removed from
the expectations of a King in the early 15th century. A 15th or 16th
century King was expected to be a competent ruler above anything else,
but far more was needed to lead the people of Medieval Briton.

The role of the king in society progressed and differed throughout the
middle ages, with the introduction of bureaucracy towards the end of
the period and a gradual detachment from the Roman empire. Many of the
king's duties remained consistent though; a king must be completely
devout and devoted to the church and to God.

The loyalty of a monarch's subjects was also imperative. The support
of the bishops and the clergy was vital for a ruler, equally the
support of the nobility and warlords of the country. Much potential
power also lay in the serfs and peasants and a good king would aim to
please even their most humble servant and an ideal king of this period
would inspire patriotism and confidence in every one of his people. An
ideal king would invoke serenity, when a time of peace was necessary,
would encourage hard labour when the economy was bad, but most
importantly: the ideal king would generate belligerence in his people
at a time of war. To be able do to this, a king must have certain
characteristics. These characteristics would motivate the confidence
of the nation.

Some of the necessary characteristics: Bravery, charisma, chivalry,
aptitude, knowledge and loyalty to the country and to god.

Shakespeare wrote 'Henry V' in the 1590s. At this time, Elizabeth I
was the ruler of the country, but the rich landowners maintained power
in the countryside, away from London. She was powerful and well
respected but not to the extent that an ideal ruler should be. She
was: 'The Virgin Queen' and therefore, she had no heir. She had ruled
through a period of stability, but as she had no heir, there was no
heir apparent to the throne. The people of Briton feared civil war,
and this would rock the country. The next ruler of Briton needed to be
powerful and controlling, yet patriotic and well respected.

Shakespeare may have had different motivations to write this play. One
of his motives may have been, to restore national pride and
individuality, in a period shortly after Henry VIII had ended all
Briton's relations with the Church of Rome, or to inspire the rise of
an ideal monarch for the country. These motives could have been the
reason why Shakespeare portrayed such a seemingly 'ideal' monarch and
such a nationally biased depiction of History. At this time, people
would learn most that they learn, and form many opinions from what
they saw in the theatre. Therefore, if Shakespeare had wanted to
encourage national...

Find Another Essay On Henry: An Ideal Monarch?

Tudor and Stuart Courts Essay

2473 words - 10 pages history; commanding and subordinating anyone who views the piece. Further to this, Henry VIII stands with his legs apart creating an unavoidable focus upon his genitalia connoting his success in virility. Although the painting evidently depicts the success in Tudor fertility by presenting Henry’s parents and the successful third wife; Henry VIII is the only figure to literally create virility as part of his image. Fertility gives the Tudor line

Leadership in William Shakespeare's Henry V

3859 words - 15 pages Henry has truly changed from the real tearaway he used to be. It seems that Shakespeare has presented us with the ideal monarch. Henry is loyal and leads by example. I think that the play was a great success. It gave the country a big boost and improved their self-esteem, which gave the citizens of England more confidence. However another opinion is that Henry is cold hearted, and a cynical ruthless manipulator, his piety a mask for his ambition and in seeking the approval of the church gave him someone to blame if all went wrong.

Shakespear's 'Henry V'- "An exploration of how Shakespere presents Henry as a king and as a man."

1158 words - 5 pages both political and personal issues that were oftentimes in juxtaposition.Looking at the way this important figure in English history is portrayed by William Shakespeare, it would seem that Shakespeare believed Henry's commanding qualities of leadership to have been necessary to stabilize the nation, and not just the actions of a tyrant or power-seeker.Shakespeare saw this monarch as an ideal example of the elements of Kingship. All his speeches

Henry VIII

975 words - 4 pages marriage with Anne valid. This madethe Pope furious. So in 1534, King Henry had the parliament pass a lawsaying that the king, not the pope, would from now on be the supreme headof the Church of England. Since Henry was now in charge of the Church , hewas going to make some changes. He had all the bibles translated intoEnglish. He then had all the people take an oath for this law. But SirThomas More and, then Cardinal, John Fisher wouldn't accept

Famous Monarchs in Eurpean History: The Tudors

2028 words - 9 pages Between the years of 1485 and 1600, England was ruled over by a new dynasty—the Tudors. The Tudors were some of the most famous monarchs in European history. There were six Tudor monarchs. The first Tudor monarch of England was Henry VII. The next monarch was Henry VIII, his son Edward VI, Jane Grey, and Henry VIII’s two daughters, Mary I and Elizabeth I. Henry VIII and his daughter Elizabeth I are the best-known monarchs; however, all the

How Henry VII's Dealings With Other Countries Helped to Strengthen his Position at Home

2738 words - 11 pages standing army except for the band of mercenaries he fought with at Bosworth and a few garrisons in North England and Calais. This was another factor that shaped his foreign policy as he could ill afford to raise expensive armies to fight with other countries. This was potentially a major problem for Henry as the people had been used to an aggressive posture and had shown their support to this by their willingness to back Edward

The Lives and Wives of King Henry VIII

1156 words - 5 pages King Henry VIII is considerable the most controversial monarch Great Britain has ever had. He is commonly known for his ill-advised decisions, six wives, and splitting Great Britain from the Catholic Church to create the Church of England. King Henry VIII of England’s determination to guarantee his family line’s continuation in the throne caused many problems, such as religious tensions, economic hardships, and political adversaries that

Henry VIII: The Narcissistic King

2310 words - 9 pages he was content to enjoy the fruits of his father’s labor, but ultimately he sought glory in his own name. Henry plunged into needless conflict in Europe, eliminated anyone who opposed him, and became so obsessed with securing a male heir that he engineered a split with the Catholic Church. It was this adventurous spirit that would lead to a decline in both of his key inheritances. Henry VIII may not have been an absolute monarch in the sense

Henry VIII: King of England

1762 words - 7 pages As a monarch, the life of Henry VIII is one of which many do not attempt to describe because of the rich amount of history that goes along with him. No king has left such a profound impact on the past accounts of his country, or has been the focus of controversial topics that have made lasting contributions to his country. His means were immoral, but because of the greatness that he achieved, we look beyond his imperfection. On June 28, 1491

the cases of two English monarchs who broke with convention by selecting spouses for reasons of the heart, rather than political convenience

2205 words - 9 pages certainly does not suggest real closeness between him and his grieving wife.By contrast, the romantic behaviour of Edward and Henry was more normally associated with an affair. In the case of Anne Boleyn, we have the unique evidence of Henry's letters. In the earliest of these he tries to get her to take him seriously -- after all, he had just ended a liaison with her married elder sister, Mary. Anne, however, refused blandishments and financial

Henry V by William Shakespeare

1273 words - 5 pages Henry V from Shakespeare’s play of the same name was a disappointment as a monarch. Although he was an intelligent man, he failed his people and himself by choosing to be unsuccessful as a true head of state. As the guardian of the people, the promotion of righteousness should be have been the first priority of Henry V. But what is righteousness, and how does it apply to a king? The main priority of a king, throughout his entire rule, should be

Similar Essays

What Characteristics Of Monarchy Emerge From A Study Of The English History Plays Of William Shakespeare?

4541 words - 18 pages king. Henry proved himself a powerful and fearless leader when he forcefully overthrew King Richard despite the divine rights bestowed upon him.The matter of the divine right of kings this is an important issue in Henry IV as he had usurped the throne and consequently he had not inherited this role it destabilized Henry's claim to the throne, as this was contravening God's jurisdiction, when a monarch was supposed to possess an awareness of

Henry V: What Qualities Made Them The Greatest Hero King In English History

1518 words - 6 pages strength to have been necessary not only to stabilize the nation, but to claim Henry as the greatest English king of all time. Shakespeare saw this monarch as an ideal example of the elements of kingship. All his speeches and those of others are faithful in their overall message: that Henry V was a peerless ruler, almost ruthless with his morals and rules, but steadfast in his love for his country. In the end, it can be said that he left no offense unpunished and no friendship unrewarded. All of these qualities epitomize Henry V as the ideal hero-king.

Prince Ideal Monarch Essay

662 words - 3 pages In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Shakespeare uses Romeus and Juliet by Arthur Brooke as a source, where he changes details, like the role of the Prince, to add more meaning to the play through his showing of an ideal monarch. Prince Escalus in Romeo and Juliet is the ruler of Verona, which is the setting of the play. He is based on the Prince in Romeus and Juliet. When Shakespeare took his character, he changed his characteristics

"Richard Ii And Henry Vi Were Weak But Well Intentioned Monarchs Who Had The Misfortune Immediately To Inherit The Crown From Illustrious Predecessors"

3946 words - 16 pages between Mowbray and Bolingbroke when Richard seems in control throughout, he appears to be an exemplary monarch- one "not born to sue, but to command" (Richard II 1.1.196) He treats his uncle with respect yet displays a superior stance of mockery and impatience towards the two sparring nobles, it appears his aim is to an impartial arbitrator and to bring about peace.However, the second scene largely dispels any impression of Richard as an ideal