In order to have a true account of the Aztec conquest, a person must be a detective.One has to take into account personal objectives, cultural beliefs, and their motives behind their writings. In addition, "attention must be paid to the 'silences' as well as to the documents".(p 27) The strengths in Bernal Diaz's writtings, such as his eye for detail and his minimal personal objectiveness, but also the inherent weaknesses of the other writtings provide us with what many call "The True History of the Conquest of New Spain".Every source has its own set of strengths and weaknesses. An examination of these sources are required for anyone to come to a conclusion of each source's own bias, and to dertmine a conclusion of their accuracy. Hernan Cortes took the credit for the accounts of the expedition, and for many years his word was the truth for many, especially for those back in Spain. They became the "basis of the official story" because they were "realistic and direct, lacking the fantasy found in others". (p 15) However, Cortes was all but direct with the people that he encountered in New Spain. From the first encounter with these new people, he uses his political strategies, which Diaz takes note in his accounts, to gain a sense of his surroundings. His primary focus was that of learning of the politcs and the wealth of the region. One can already see the gold pesos gleaming in the eyes of Cortes when he finds of the vast wealth of the land.He also paints a very explicit picture of the indigeonous people of the region and their customs, especially their religious practices. He compares them to the Moors (Muslims) which the Christians have fighting in Europe for many years prior to the expeditions. "Horrible and abominable customs they have which should certainly be punished". (p83) Cortes' letter to the king and the way that he communicates with the people of the new world remind me of Eddie Haskel talking to Wally's mom. Buttery and sweet as mollasses, but shady and having alternate motives. As in the instance of the Noche Triste, for which neither Diaz or Cortes were present.One account was taken, not from Cortes' letters, but from Istoria de la conquista de Mexico, by Francisco Lopez de Gomara. He was hired by Cortes to write his biography of these accounts in order to please the people of Spain and give and "accurate account" of the events that transpired. De Gomara was always very favorable to Cortes in his writtings, which is something that angered Diaz. He was the first to address the reasoning behind the violent massacre called the Noche Triste, meaning sad night. His account softens the responsiblilty of the members of the spanish that did the slaying, and of course explaining that there was a possible conspiracy from the indians. Also, he makes note of Cortes' sorrow and excuses him from taking any action in response to the event by saying that "Cortes, who must have felt badly about the affair, dissembled his feelings so as not to...