History Of The Courts Essay

1336 words - 6 pages

INTRODUCTION There are many aspects contributing to the history of criminal law: the concept of law, the origin of law, and finally the development of law. Each point is equally important and influential to the maturation of criminal law.CONCEPT OF LAW The concept of law is to protect those who are innocent and to prosecute those who are guilty. Law is the infrastructure of our economic, social, and political lives. It gives order to our existence and makes us equal. Without law, we as a nation would collapse and become a very volatile society. Every crime falls under a pertinent conviction or penalty. When laws and statutes are made and passed, morals have to be taken ...view middle of the document...

Sinful actions were insolent upon two grounds: they induced conflict in society and ravaged the relationship among people, and the injustice of any descendant of Abraham could bear celestial wrath down upon the nation. National rectitude is essential to the survival of this religious culture. The Greek city-state of Athens renders the suitable civilization ruled by the spry political participation of society in the concerns of bureaucracy. Athens, in its classical period, flourished from Mediterranean business enterprise; trading consisted of substances capable of being used for food and various necessities of life bartered from less progressed regions. Athenians, with a long tradition of pursuing autonomy, established a strong value on their city-state's capability to endure rulers. The Athenian's ordeal with Spartan tyrants had surely swayed the people that democracy was imperative to joy. While their productive wealth developed, their determination of government figures to obstruct any person from possessing power and installing totalitarianism. In Athenian law, one was acquitted in murdering someone who was aspiring to overthrow the democracy or establish tyranny. The enormous structure of Roman judiciary and constitutional principles has outlined western opinions of government through the times. Republican Rome was established on the dependability of the people to raise a constitutional land governed by the reciprocity of noble strength in the Senate and humble vigour displayed in the tribunate. During 509-25 B.C., Rome prevailed over most of the known world. Roman republicans concurred with Greek animosity to tyrants. Their particular form of government was built on the notion of the citizen-soldier as the determinant to Roman power in the world. Their criminal justice system aided in protecting the people from unfair prosecution and provided each person with an open comprehension of his or her liberties and obligations to the republic. There is another pattern of human social organization which dates back as far as 200,000 years ago. The hunting and gathering society has been a controlling type of social genre in the history of the human species. Acephalous, which is headless or leaderless, societies were the only category of human community for 30,000 of the 40,000 years since the development of mankind. These communities were small, conservatively collaborative, and believed somewhat in equality. They had simple technology and they divided work by age and sex. Also, with no ruler or government with the commanding power of others, the acephalous society generally depicted more by harmony and cooperation. With small communities consisting of fifty members, the hunting and gathering groups had very tight kinship with one another. While working in such close, intimate, and small quarters each member learned to develop personal restraint and the control of impulse. This inturn would prevent...

Find Another Essay On History Of The Courts

The Jury and Its Role in the Courts of Trial

2023 words - 8 pages The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely

Roper v. Simmons: An Examination of the Supreme Courts Role

3102 words - 12 pages cases with no respect to the states or precedence. Another issue with the evidence used to assert new finding on the differences between juveniles and adults are not well documented. The Deborah Denno asserts in her analysis on the Roper case that the scientific evidence used in part to assert the courts altered opinion on this issue is not well documented as well as outdated (Denno, 2006). The lack of valid research used by the court is well

The approach the Zimbabwean courts take towards the question of damages in breach of contract cases

1795 words - 7 pages Zimbabwean courts towards the question of damages in breach of contract.DAMAGES TO BREACH OF CONTRACTThese are monetary equivalents of specific performance. The fundamental rule in regard to award of damages for breach of contract is that the sufferer should be placed in the position he would have occupied had the contract been properly performed, so far as it can be satisfied by payment of money and without causing any hardships to the defaulting party

What does the 'Trial of Verres' reveal about provincial malpractice and corruption in the Roman Courts

1209 words - 5 pages demonstrates this, but he also states the fact the Verres' goes to much further lengths than most do and is worse than the average defendant. He opens by severely warning the judges of the court not to take bribes or otherwise they will face the wrath of the people, who have already lost much faith in the honesty of the Roman Courts, 'To increase the unpopularity of your order is very far from my intention. On the contrary, I am eager to remove

Prosecutorial and Judicial Independence of the Superior Courts in Hong Kong

1445 words - 6 pages Basic Law provides for both prosecutorial and judicial independence, as both are vital under the Rule of Law in Hong Kong. This paper looks at issues in connection with prosecutorial independence and judicial independence of the superior courts. Indeed both are not functioning with total independency with the judiciary perceived to be more independent. As both are vital to the rule of law in Hong Kong, the prosecutorial independency and

Thurgood Marshall was probably the only black leader in American History who can argue that he defeated segregation where it really counts, in the courts

1216 words - 5 pages Slavery is a prominent part of United States history. Slavery has existed for thousands of years in many cultures, but in the United States, the institution seemed to have been perfected. It also came at a time of enlightenment, when many began to see slavery not as the necessity that many felt it was, but as an evil exploitation of men. Slavery was the backbone of the primary industry of the South.The United States Constitution is the basis of

Plea-Bargains: Currency of the Courts An Examination of the Effectiveness of Plea-Bargain Within our Court Systems

1514 words - 6 pages the “Askov Defence”. Without the benefit of plea bargaining to streamline pending criminal charges and reduce the backlog of cases before the Courts, accused’s rights to a speedy trial would continue to be at risk and give rise to opportunities for charges to be dismissed on technical grounds. The argument can be made that the use of plea-bargaining within North America has become to “soft” on criminals who break the law and receive a

How might the changing demographics and diversity of the U.S. population affect the operation of juvenile and criminal courts?

803 words - 3 pages The changing demographics and diversity of the U.S. population may affect the operation of juvenile and criminal courts by the effectiveness in properly dealing with new trends in crime and all the costs of hearing and preparing the court cases, and of hiring more people to deal with the increase in crime in the future, and finally the cost of rehabilitating those offenders.Some of the things that could change this are the rise in elderly

The Courts Should Not Have the Right to Make Legislation that the Majority of People Do Not Approve Of

680 words - 3 pages The Courts Should Not Have the Right to Make Legislation that the Majority of People Do Not Approve Of Democracy is defined by Merriam - Webster's dictionary as "government by the people; especially: rule of the majority." America was founded to protect individual's rights and freedoms from being violated by the government. Our Constitution and the Bill of Rights were specifically written to limit the powers of the government. The

DISCUSS HOW THE COURTS MAY INCORPORATE THE DIFFERENT AIMS/THEORIES OF SENTENCING DURING THE PROCESS OF SENTENCING OFFENDERS

2346 words - 10 pages drug abuse etc. Also community orders such as drug testing and treatment orders take a place in the aim of rehabilitation. Extended sentence means that the offender is given a prison sentence (up to maximum) plus an extension period during which the offender is on licence. The extension period cannot exceed ten years for a sexual offence and five years for a violent offence as it stated in the Powers of Criminal Courts (sentencing) Act 2000

Have the courts struck a balance between the protection of individual rights under The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary sovereignty?

2052 words - 8 pages The traditional Diceyan view was that the role of the judges is to protect civil liberties and human rights through the common law, and by judicial interpretation. Dicey placed great emphasis on the fact that there was no need for a formal document laying down the rights of the individual, as the remedies of private law provided adequate protection. His view was backed up by the classic decision in Entick v Carrington, where the courts

Similar Essays

Understanding The Complexity Of Canada's Courts

924 words - 4 pages higher courts. Canada's supreme Court has the authority to overrule all lower Canadian courts. When there is an issue that there is little existing Canadian decisions they will often look at rulings made by the English of American courts. There is a long standing correlation between Canadian and English law, where the examples of the English House of Appeals and House of Lords are followed. Since there is this history, decisions by the House of Lords

Drug Courts: The Return Of Rehabilitation

2340 words - 9 pages the advent of problem solving court's justice is coming full circle. Specialty courts such as Drug court have begun to emerge as criminal justice's new technique to rehabilitate offenders.IntroductionThroughout the years many major policy initiatives and programs have been endorsed in the war against illicit drugs. These have included: antidrug legislation and strict enforcement, interdiction, antidrug education and treatment, none of these has

Plea Bargains: Currency Of The Courts

1514 words - 6 pages the “Askov Defence”. Without the benefit of plea bargaining to streamline pending criminal charges and reduce the backlog of cases before the Courts, accused’s rights to a speedy trial would continue to be at risk and give rise to opportunities for charges to be dismissed on technical grounds. The argument can be made that the use of plea-bargaining within North America has become to “soft” on criminals who break the law and receive a

The Fallibility Of Partial Dna In Courts

1983 words - 8 pages Raymond Easton case (Naughton 246). Raymond Easton was a DNA match to a burglary 200 miles away. Easton could barely walk much less drive; therefore, charges were dropped, but courts were convinced of his guilt since the partial DNA profile from the crime scene was a match. (Naughton 246) A partial DNA profile can, in no way, produce a match that is, without a doubt, the perpetrator (Naughton 252). Mixed DNA samples, which are a mixture of