This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Hostile Takeovers Essay

715 words - 3 pages

Hostile Takeover
Introduction:
When one company acquires another, without any deal or coming by an agreement to target the company’s management is called “Hostile Takeover”. The main characteristic of hostile takeover is to grab the company’s management, so that they could run the company and can generate more profits. Company uses two ways to hostile takeover that are: Tender offer and Proxy Fights. Hostile takeover have been a part of corporate world for many years. There has been a steady increase in the number of takeovers. Many factors lead to an increase in hostile takeovers such as: Leverage, Political conditions, high profits and etc. Takeover has significant negative effects on the human factors, targeted corporations, their employees, their families and the state economies.
History of Hostile Takeovers
There was a Rapid increase in 1980 in hostile takeovers. Nowadays, the annual transaction activity amounts to $2,000 billion representing over 30,000 deals worldwide. There are six merfger waves up till now. These merger waves occurred in 1900, 1920, 1960, 1980, 1990 and in 2000. The most recent takeover is of KPN by Mexican company of America Movil and Fairstar by Dockwise.
Reasons of Hostile Takeover:
There are many reasons that companies takeover other companies. Management of a company might avoid the acquisition because they might feel that that the deal would reduce the value of the company or put a company into such condition that it might go out of business. They might think that a company can generate more profits in the near future, so they pay more money than its actual worth. The buyer might take over a target company to have access of its distribution channels, its brand name, or to gain technology. The enticement of high profits have provided a large amount of funds to fuel takeovers.
Impact of Hostile Takeover:
A hostile takeover has negative impact on not only management but on employees, stockholders and customers. When a change in company control takes over the corporation who becomes in charge prefers to bring in their own management to integrate and become the decision makers of the...

Find Another Essay On Hostile Takeovers

Feudalism with The Lords and Vassals

988 words - 4 pages fiefs. The fief is just a tool for understanding the loyalty between the lords and vassals. Some of the fortresses they had built were called Thouars, Vivonne, Civray, Chize’, Confolens, and Gencay. In the agreement, there were many hostile takeovers and betrayals. Aimery was the main one who was doing all the conquering and takeovers. He took over fortress Civray and Chize. In order for Count William to take back these fortresses he had to

article analysis

1880 words - 8 pages credo of maximizing shareholder value as a direct consequence of the new principal-agent theory. 16. Aggressive investors used the shareholder-value movement to justify their hostile-takeovers of companies they deemed undervalued. By slashing costs and slimming down the companies they aimed to maximize the value of the firm in the stock market. 17. Many economists defended that these hostile takeovers overcame the agency problem and were

Third World

1291 words - 5 pages the future. Concerning the reasoning of the developed's actions taking place in the third world developed conflicts with the Third World view. The developed countries arm and maintain military presence in the third world and declare: "to prevent takeovers by hostile foreigners" as their reason. However third world countries have a different point of view of these actions. They believe the threat is not the hostile foreign countries but their

Analysis of Cadbury Brother Limited

991 words - 4 pages , economist started concern about the managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure (Jensen, 1988). Although, shareholders can choose the management teams who represent their interest, the executives only concern about their own interest such as bonus, extra dividends. It causes the divorce of ownership. In 2010, Cadbury Schweppes was hostile tookover by a US food manufacturer Kraft. They transformed to run by financial capitalism

Analysis of Dayton Hudson Corporation Case

827 words - 3 pages In the case of Dayton Hudson Corporation, the company fell into a situation of a hostile takeover attempted by the Dart Group in 1987. At that time, Kenneth Macke was the CEO of the Dayton Hudson Corporation and sternly disagreed with letting the company fall into the hands of the Haft's. Macke's decision on what could be done to terminate the takeover turned the circumstances over to the hands of the state of Minnesota where Dayton Hudson's

Olympic Foods: A case argument

669 words - 3 pages services at the most competitive prices to stay in the businessAs Peter.F.drucker quotes " If you cant beat them, join them" this is true as this century has seen a lot of amalgamations between medium and big firms. Hostile takeovers, mergers and acquisitions and other management strategies formed to run business in a more cost effective style. This decade has seen the mergers of L.N Mittal, the steel baron acquiring Arcelor, Lenovo's take over of

Corporate Governance

3285 words - 13 pages diversification and acquisitions strategies for the sake of increased prestige and job security but eschew restructuring or takeover efforts due to their deleterious effects on insiders. Likewise, William Schneper and Mauro Guillén find that hostile takeovers are less common in countries where the national legal system privileges workers, but are more frequent when shareholder rights are highly protected. Other researchers who highlight the

Corporate Governance

3469 words - 14 pages , these two groups might also align themselves against the opposing interests of shareholders. Both managers and owners might advocate diversification and acquisitions strategies for the sake of increased prestige and job security but eschew restructuring or takeover efforts due to their deleterious effects on insiders. Likewise, William Schneper and Mauro Guill�n find that hostile takeovers are less common in countries where the national legal

The Creation of a Beverage Giant

2289 words - 10 pages Many people like to relax on the weekends with an ice cold beer, but most of them do not realize how volatile the business of breweries can get. Every day all around the world there are companies that participate in mergers, acquisitions and hostile takeovers. However, in the case of InBev’s hostile takeover of Anheuser-Busch (AB), something else happened. It changed the culture and long-standing tradition of an all-American company which was

McBride Governance Evaluation

2286 words - 9 pages governance for many organizations during this period. In the 1980s, in reaction to shareholder neglect, restructuring activities and hostile takeovers began increasing. U.S. companies use of debt financing was so extensive it resulted in corporate leverage ratios to substantially increase. "The wedge between actual and potential corporate performance became increasingly apparent," (Chew & Gillan, 2004, p. 74). Excess capacity was created by

How the USA Lost the Vietnam War

1053 words - 4 pages in most hostile takeovers. This was on November 1, 1963; three weeks before Kennedy was shot in Dallas, Texas. Once again the US, albeit by its own decisions, is dragged into a war due to enemy attack. On August 2, 1964 the DRV executed a strike on the U.S.S Maddox, A United States Navy destroyer cruising international waters near North Vietnam’s coast. Now, it is truly a war. “We are at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced

Similar Essays

The Recent Corporate Hostile Takeovers In Japan

6919 words - 28 pages ). This is because the potential acquirer has the opportunity to make a larger profit than the cost of the acquisition if the acquirer will be able to purchase the targeted industry and then sell its assets.Economists have said that in the Japanese market, there are few hostile takeovers, which have been conducted against some Japanese industries. Even at the dawn of this century, it was said that there is no market for corporate control in Japan

Hostile Takeovers Essay

1319 words - 6 pages Sourav has illustrated in the initial portion of his discussion how it is that the HPR and DDM values of his selected firms will differ, mainly as a result of the different assumptions underlying each formula. Between the HPR model’s generalized distribution assumption, and the DDM’s time-consuming need to forecast each incremental dividend to be paid, investors are faced with a dilemma when determining which model to use when valuing a firm

Corporate Governance Mechanisms Essay

856 words - 3 pages A TAKEOVER What does a takeover mean? In the simplest terms, a takeover is a tool of corporate control whereby a company gets its hands on another company by acquiring control of the company to a purchase of the majority of its shares. Takeovers are different in nature. While some are hostile takeovers others may be friendly takeovers and where it involves a government rescuing a company by pumping some good amount of money in it, it becomes a

The Impact Of Hostile Takeover In Japan

5434 words - 22 pages , 2003). This is because the potential acquirer has the opportunity to make a larger profit than the cost of the acquisition if the acquirer will be able to purchase the targeted industry and then sell its assets. It is said that in the Japanese market, there are few hostile takeovers which has been conducted against some Japanese industries.Primarily, the goal of this paper is to assess the emergence of hostile takeovers against Japanese business