This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

How Does Mark Antony Use Language In 3.2 To Take Power Away From Brutus And The Other Conspirators?

1067 words - 4 pages

How does Mark Antony use language in 3.2 to take power away from Brutus and the other conspirators?During Antony's speech he uses language as his main weapon to take power away from Brutus and the conspirators so he can avenge his dead friend Caesar, the leader of Rome; however I believe there may well be an underlying political motive for gaining power off the conspirators. He clearly uses great skill as at the start of the speech he has to persuade the conspirators while barely mentioning his opinion of how good Caesar was so as not to endanger his life. He uses devices such as rhetorical questions and synthetic personalisation to achieve this.Antony's use of synthetic personalisation, brings the crowd round to his side as it's as if Antony is making himself equal to them; the most obvious use of this is when he says 'your hearts and minds' and 'to wrong myself and you'. The pronoun 'you' and 'your' helps Antony appear to be talking to specific people in the crowd making them more inclined to listen to what he says and side with him. He employs this technique more subtly when he refers to the crowd as 'Friends, Romans, Countrymen'. He is saying to the crowd they're his friends, which at first may not seem that striking but later in the same speech he says 'come I to speak in Caesar's funeral.//he was my friend.' As he has called Caesar his friend within twelve lines of saying the same thing to the Plebians it makes them feel as if they are at Caesar's level in Mark Antony's eyes. This flattery softens the crowd to Mark Antony's views allowing him to be more rash and he begins to be a lot less subtle in his plans for the conspirators. Calling Caesar his friend gives a human aspect to Caesar which may help the crowd accept Mark Antony's view that Caesar was an innocent man.Antony recognises this change in mood after his first speech when the Plebians say 'Caesar has had great wrongs' and 'I fear there will be worse in his place'. This is a remarkable change in the mood of the Plebians as before Mark Antony speaks they call Caesar a 'tyrant' and feel they are 'blest that Rome is rid of him'. This gives Antony the cue to begin to attack Brutus and the conspirators with techniques like the repetition of 'honourable men' just this phrase repeated although it appears simple is, in fact, a very clever move on Antony's part as he never bad mouths Cassius and Brutus but asks questions of the crowd. In repeating this phrase, they begin to wonder if they Cassius and Brutus are honourable men and they believe they're making their own minds, but all the time Antony is hinting that they aren't as 'honourable' as they seem.From the start Antony sets out to appease the crowd when at first he says, 'I come to bury Caesar not to praise him'. Antony does this because he realises how dangerous the crowd are and knows that if he were to stand there and sing Caesar's praises they would turn on him, therefore much to his word he never praises...

Find Another Essay On How does Mark Antony use language in 3.2 to take power away from Brutus and the other conspirators?

How and to what extent does language make humans distinctive from other animals?

1888 words - 8 pages this is time consuming and can only be done on an individual basis. Dunbar (1993, p. 89) comments, "What language seems to do is allow you to overcome that barrier and use what time you have in a much more efficient way." Language allows humans to talk to several people at the same time. You can talk whilst doing other tasks and this enables humans to reach many more individuals, increasing the amount of people you are communicating

Julius Caesar: Comparison of the Eulogies of Mark Antony and Brutus

753 words - 3 pages speeches differ is the use of word repetition. Antony continually uses repetition of the words honorable and (y). Brutus does not use this rhetorical device to his advantage as he should. Antony’s continued use of the word “honorable” makes it seem like a worthless trait to hold. It makes the plebeians think that Brutus was not worthy of this title, and that he ed Cæsar for no reason other than showing his humbleness to the public

Use of Rhetorical Appeals in Julius Caesar: Brutus vs Antony

975 words - 4 pages factual evidence. Antony, on the other hand, utilizes logical argumentation with solid evidence, creates an emotional connection with his audience, and maintains credibility in order to support his own argument. Through this, it can be seen that Antony’s use of rhetorical appeals and devices is superior to Brutus’s in its ability to persuade the Roman audience. Brutus does back up his argument effectively by augmenting and emphasizing his credibility

Shakespeare's Use of Language in Antony and Cleopatra

2734 words - 11 pages Shakespeare's Use of Language in Antony and Cleopatra Enobarbus uses the phrase "infinite variety" to describe the beauty and wonder of Cleopatra to Agrippa and Maecenas in Act 2 Scene 2. In the context of the whole play I believe it is a perfect description of how Cleopatra uses the different aspects of her character. Shakespeare uses language, imagery and structure to show the different sides of her personality

How does Walker use form, structure, and language to explore the exploitation of female characters in The Color Purple?

618 words - 3 pages connection with the novel’s format. On the other hand, Nettie’s narration of her letters to Celie is, in comparison, more clear and written in standard written English. In the first letter that Nettie is writing to Celie, she begins by convincing Celie that ‘You’ve got fight and get away from Albert.’ It is clear that Nettie has had higher education than Celie as Celie would say “got” instead of ‘gotta’ - to further notate her lack of education; whereas

How does Bronte use Language and Structure in Wuthering Heights to present the theme of Violence and what does this show?

1241 words - 5 pages to signify Hareton's change from animalistic to the ideal Victorian gentleman. However, despite this transformation Brontё does not portray Hareton as having separated himself his previously violent nature. In 'smart slap' Brontё's use of double entendre associates Hareton's newfound education with violence, suggesting that violence is an intrinsic aspect of human nature as it is something that remains a personality trait of Hareton's despite

How does Ben Jonson use language and structure to convey the message of the poem "On my first Sonne"?

1161 words - 5 pages departing of his son and what it meant to him. "Joy" is used to contrast Benoni and causes confusion and uncertainty.Another language feature in this poem is presented in line three, "Seven yeeres thou wert lent to me, and I thee pay". This phrase has twelve syllables and has three stresses at "SEVEN YEERES THOU", meanwhile the other lines have ten syllables and are in iambic metre. This is used to emphasis the "seven yeeres" that his child lived

What ideas are being explored in Wilfred Owen’s ‘Disabled’? How does the poet skilfully use language and structure to get across his ideas?

1794 words - 8 pages is clearly identified. Owen first describes in extreme detail the reality of war with graphic imagery in Stanza III. This can be seen in the quotation: “He lost his colour very far from here”. The action of the protagonist losing his colour is a metaphor that Owen uses effectively to symbolise the protagonist losing a lot of blood, which gives the reader a first hint about the brutality of war. “Colour” can also be interpreted as the fruitful and

"The Siege" by Helen Dunmore: How does Dunmore effectively dramatize the power of cold and starvation in pg 36-39? You should closely analyze the use of language and techniques

553 words - 2 pages Dunmore uses several effective methods to dramatize the power of cold and starvation. Some of them are more effective than others. In my opinion the most effective method she uses is the personification of cold and hunger into people.She personifies cold and hunger and makes them generals. She gives them these high titles in the military hierarchy to emphasize the effect they can have on the people. This personification forces the reader to

How does Shakespeare use language and dramatic effects to in Act 1, Scene 1 and Act 3, Scene 1 of "Romeo and Juliet"?

2012 words - 8 pages How does Shakespeare use language and dramatic effects to in Act 1, Scene 1 and Act 3, Scene 1 of "Romeo and Juliet"?In "Romeo and Juliet" William Shakespeare delves into several forms of masculinity in the male dominated city of Verona, starting with the mention of the ancient feud between the two families - this sets the initial tone of the play as violent.The play shows us not just the fiery nature of men such as Tybalt; but also the love and

How Does Shakespeare Use Language to Present King Henry both as a Man and a King in "King Henry 5th" by Shakespeare?

2129 words - 9 pages upon my head dread sovereign."Henry has asked for the blessing from the church and through Canterbury, Henry has received this approval, with Canterbury himself saying he is willing to take full responsibility. This shows Henry is nothing like his old self, he really thinks seeking the Holy Churches permission is important. It seems as thou Henry is as devoted as the clergy.Another side to Henry is his cleverness in war tactics and strategy. Henry

Similar Essays

How Does Antony Use Language To Manipulate The People?

958 words - 4 pages Antony deploys an array of persuasive, yet subtle, techniques within his eulogy to Caesar which turn the plebeians back against the conspirators whom, for a short period of time during Brutus’s speech, they had supported. Antony uses a repetitive structure throughout his speech in which he lists Caesar’s triumphs and speaks of how he was a ‘faithful and just’ friend and then finishes each verse commenting ‘But Brutus says he was ambitious, and

Examining How Brutus And Mark Anthony Utilise Language To Manipulate The Audience In Act 3 Scene 2 Of Julius Caesar

2072 words - 8 pages Examining how Brutus and Mark Anthony Utilise Language to Manipulate the Audience in Act 3 Scene 2 of Julius Caesar This essay will scrutinize and analyse two speeches from Julius Caesar; firstly Brutus's funeral oration and Mark Anthony's response in Act 3 Scene 2. Brutus as a conspirator against Caesar addresses the audience to justify himself along with his other conspirator's actions whilst Mark Anthony speaks in

Comapring The Speeches Of Mark Antony And Brutus In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

2132 words - 9 pages " which proves that the crowd are completely taken in by how Brutus has delivered his speech. However after this has happened, Brutus makes the mistake of leaving Mark Antony and the crowd alone while Antony's speech is delivered. Brutus does this only because he thinks that Antony is about to deliver a speech on Caesars life. Brutus thought that Antony was to perform a eulogy for Caesar, when in actual fact he was about to

Julius Caesar Comparative Essay: Mark Antony And Marcus Brutus

1136 words - 5 pages become leader himself. As mentioned before, Antony plans to kill off Lepidus (p. 414). This shows how Antony wants all the power to himself, as he has "seen more days" (p. 414) than Octavius, and therefore feels superior to him. Brutus, on the other hand, never wanted to be the leader of Rome; he only wanted to save it from poor rule. Regarding the assassination of Caesar, he says to the plebeians, "I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall