How Far Is Descartes’ Argument From Indivisibility Successful As A Justification For The Need Of A Metaphysical Distinction Between Mind And Body?

841 words - 3 pages

How far is Descartes' Argument from Indivisibility successful as a justification for the need of a metaphysical distinction between mind and body?
Descartes introduces the argument from indivisibility by positing what he discerns as the fundamental difference between the mind and body, stating that "...the body is by its very nature always divisible while the mind is utterly indivisible." (Descartes, 1641 6th Mediation). The distinction is arguably best understood as an application of Descartes' notion of extension, first outlined in Principles of Philosophy, Book I, as constituting the "...nature of corporeal substance..." (Descartes, 1644). For Descartes, if an object is extended (res extensor), it is a physical thing which can be quantitatively described, and thereby divided. 
 Upon, what seems to be an almost prima facie consideration of the mind, Descartes reasons that he is "...unable to distinguish any parts within himself" in the way that the body seems to be able to be divided. Indeed, Descartes reasons that the mind isn't divisible in the way that the body is, postulating that if "...any..part of the the body is cut off nothing thereby has been taken away from the mind' ( Descartes, 1641 6th Mediation). If we accept Descartes' argument that all extended things are divisible, then it follows that that which is indivisible is non---material Thus, if we understand the mind to be indivisible (res cognates), then we a led to position of dualism.
However, the findings of modern neurophysiology, here, spring to mind as a glaring counterexample to Descartes' claim that the mind is indivisible. Countless studies seem to have shown the relation between mental states and, particular, physical brain regions (Feinberg 2001, pp. 2). One such example is found in the case of epileptic patients who underwent a corpus callosotomy (an operation severing the nerve fibres connecting the two hemispheres of the brain), the implications of which suggest that the mind actually seems to divide into two separate conscious awareness (Feinberg 2001, pp. 91). Cases such as this one seem to suggest that memories, thoughts, beliefs and other mental states are states of the physical brain. Ultimately, whether one accepts dualism or not, it seems that what happens in the mind is very closely related to what happens in the brain.
Nonetheless, perhaps merely considering the impact of neurophysiological changes upon the mind is to understand Descartes' argument rather crudely. If we take Descartes' exploration to be rooted in the qualitative experience of the mind, this is to say the phenomenological character of brain states,...

Find Another Essay On How far is Descartes’ Argument from Indivisibility successful as a justification for the need of a metaphysical distinction between mind and body?

Essence of Mind and Body for Descartes

1096 words - 4 pages with his argument for dualism, which is the possibility that the mind was distinct from the body. In Descartes' Mediations on First Philosophy, he is able to construct his arguments for the real distinction of mind from body, by understanding how the physical world operates based on the notions he sets. His claim will eventually be refuted because of his lack of understanding of how a non-extended mind affects an extended bodyDescartes' main

Descartes - Mind and Body. Essay

2270 words - 9 pages perceive. He begins to explore this notion that he had previously dismissed to doubt. He inquires whether his senses give him reason for bodies to exist. He comes to the conclusion that they do because God has given us "a great inclination to believe that these ideas proceeded from corporeal things." ( ) This proof progresses into the nature of how mind and body co-exist. Descartes beliefs are as follows: It is from nature that we distinguish other

Descartes' arguments for immateriality of mind/soul based on the notion of dualism: body is extended object and mind/soul is non-extended.

1858 words - 7 pages mind is immortal or not.The Real Distinction arguments as Descartes defines it, is found the Sixth Meditation. In this argument he tries to convey the immortality of mind by this dualistic distinction between mind and body. So Descartes states that he has a 'clear and distinct idea' of himself as mind - non-extended object, and on the contrary, he has an idea of body as extended, non-thinking thing. So he concludes that he (his mind) is distinct

Descartes on the Mind and Body

834 words - 4 pages Descartes’ understanding of substances must be false. He himself states that we must be sure that something is different from something else to be sure that it exists separately. If his two distinctions are false then, how can we be sure that mind and matter are in fact different things? If we cannot distinguish or the distinction is illogical then it is not a real distinction. Thus since both of his distinctions between mind and matter are incorrect

The Mind-body problem in Descartes Meditations

1402 words - 6 pages Descartes goes into is the argument for the distinction of mind and body and the existence of material objects. He starts off with the argument from knowledge. If he clearly understands an object as one thing, distinct from another, it is so. He is also certain that he exists as a thinking thing, while he isn't certain of the existence of his body. Therefore, he is a thinking thing and nothing else. His mind is distinct from his body. He is a

The mind-body relation at descartes

2861 words - 11 pages , le lipșeste puterea argumentativă pentru a clarifica această problemă. 8Bibliografie:Descartes, Rene. Meditații metafizice. Editura Crater, București, 1993. (trad. Ion Papuc)The philosophical writings of Descartes. Volume 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984. (translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothhoff, Dulagd Murdoch).Baird, F. and Kaufmann, W. (ed.), Modern Philosophy, Prentice Hall, 2008Clatterbaugh, K. The Causal Debate in Modern Philosophy 1637-1739, Routledge, 1996Cottingham, J. The rationalist. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998

Analyzing Individuation and Identity In Descartes´ Philosophical View of the Mind-Body Dualism

1292 words - 5 pages entity may be intimately connected to the body, however the non-corporeal entity is not a material entity as is the body. Descartes has contributed several arguments for this belief , one them was the conceivability argument which necessarily involves a degree of tautology. Descartes states that since the idea of the separate existence of the mind and body is conceivable, that it is then possible. If the possible exist that two things can exist

Title: Mind and Body: An interpretation on the works of Rene Descartes and Benedictus de Spinoza -Talks about "Dualism" and "Double Aspect Theory"

1152 words - 5 pages removed parts of his brain (the material part or the "extension.")From the different views of these two philosophers we see how the mind/body argument continues to be a difficult and controversial topic. Descartes points out the distinction between mind and body, while Spinoza assess' their unity. I found Descartes argument for dualism more plausible, but since philosophers have spent years arguing over the mind/body relation, I believe they will quite possibly remain to do so because of the difficulty in trying to understand the concept of the mind.

An argument for the validity of International Law as a governing body between nations.

1387 words - 6 pages customs and cultures. Nations as a whole also have there own forms of law for dealing with its nationals whether they be derivations of common, code, or Islamic law. International Law often serves as a mediator when dealing with two different nations in dispute, or in other cases serves as the only legal body in the hierarchy. Yes, International Law is different because it deals with a much broader spectrum and without its uniqueness there would be no facilitation of international disputes and agreements, or in an extreme case lawlessness among nations.

“Good humor is a tonic for the mind and body.

970 words - 4 pages "Good humor is a tonic for the mind and body. It is the best anecdote for anxiety and depression. It is a business asset. It attracts and keeps friends. It lightens human burdens. It is the direct routine to serenity and contentment." -Greenville Kleiser. Comedy as mentioned is that of a necessary entity in one's everyday life and undertakings. The use of comedy can brighten one's day or simply provide the humor that people desire. When able to

How far should the outcome of the Korean War be seen as a triumph for the USA? (do mind the sp mistakes my spell check wasn't working!)

965 words - 4 pages How far should the outcome of the Korean War be seen as a triumph for the USA?Before the Korean War ensued America maintained the reputation of a dominatingly, successful and unbeatable superpower, an image that was further enhanced by the fact they emerged victorious after their intervention in WWII. Consequently the inability to win the Korean War and the resulting detriments of the war was disquieting for the US, notably by the fact they had

Similar Essays

Descartes’ Arguments For The Real Distinction Of Mind And Body

1915 words - 8 pages Descartes’ Arguments for the Real Distinction of Mind and Body Descartes argues has three main arguments for minds and bodies being two different distinct types of substance. These are known as arguments for substance dualism and are as follows. * The Argument from doubt : Descartes argues that while he could pretend or think that he had no body and therefore did not exist in any place, he could not think or

The Distinction Between The Mind And Body

647 words - 3 pages "outer" are construed as metaphors, the problem of how one's mind and body can influence one another is well-known charged with abstract difficulties. Therefore there is a popular conflict between mind and matter. A conflict which is often brought out as follows. Material objects are categorized as "space" and what happens to one body in one part of a space is mechanically combined with what happens to other bodies in other parts of space. On

Analysis Of Descartes’ Mind/Body Distinction

1174 words - 5 pages mind is distinct from the body is through his claim that the mind occupies no physical space and is an entity with which people think, while the body is a physical entity and cannot serve as a mechanism for thought. [1] I believe most of this portion of his position to be true. The body quite certainly has a physical presence and is not capable of controlling or thinking for itself. I begin to disagree with Descartes’ theory at the point

How Did Descartes Explain The Relationship Between Mind And Body?

2612 words - 10 pages Across the years, many scientists and philosophers believed that a human being is made up by mind and body (Radner, 1971). Some of them believed that the mind-soul is something different from the body and each of them works by themselves without any interaction between them (Radner, 1971). The other point of view said that body and mind works together as a unity and mutually influences each other and the result is the human being. This view