How Might The Death Penalty Prevent Crime? Discuss In An Essay.

1323 words - 5 pages

The Death Penalty: How does it affect crime?The death penalty is a major issue that brings up a lot of controversy in our society. The most important question concerning the death penalty is whether it should be abolished or not. Many people think that the death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights and that it also violates the right to life. Some say it is cruel, inhumane, and a degrading type of punishment. Other people are for it and believe that we need to weed out the bad and seed in the good, no matter what type of actions we take. I feel that the death penalty should be looked at very carefully before we even consider using it.The death penalty was originally derived from the United States. This only means we need to make changes towards fixing the problem. Eliminating the death penalty would not be a solution; it would only lead to more arguments. No matter what reasons the government gives for killing prisoners in its custody, and no matter what execution methods are used, people are aware of their rights and know what the consequences are for committing a crime. The death penalty is a type of the punishments for some capital crimes; therefore, we know it's out there, so why should we not suffer the punishment. I feel the death penalty should not be eliminated but should only be used to an extent.In some places in the word there is a punishment called the death penalty, this is the most extreme way available to governments to punish people, legally that is. An example of a country who uses the death penalty is America, however only a few states do, some places have abolished this procedure. There are many ways of doing this:Lethal InjectionElectric ChairFiring SquadGasHanging (however this is not used any more)There are a lot of problems with this but also there are many reasons why it should be in place, this essay will try to show both sides equally.Here is a major problem, one of the many major problems, for there are many, is that there was one a woman who was accused of murder, however it was not murder. It was a crime of passion, in other words manslaughter. She was hanged.Derek Bentley was hanged on 28 January 1953 for a murder he did not commit. Here is his story.Bentley, completely unarmed and while being held by a policeman after an abortive break-in, is alleged to have called out to his accomplice "Let him have it, Chris". After a while, Chris Craig shot and killed a policeman. 16-year-old Craig was jailed - 19-year-old Bentley was hanged. The story has generated several books, a film and even some songs. It took 16619 days from Derek's death, but he has, at long last, been pardoned. His family fought for years to clear his name and during this time his mother died trying to clear him and it was eventually continued by his sister.The people who are not against the death penalty say it is a deterrent, they say it's a warning to criminals, murderers and the every day assassins. If you kill someone, someone will kill...

Find Another Essay On How might the death penalty prevent crime? Discuss in an essay.

There's No Evidence The Death Penalty Deters Crime

1748 words - 7 pages effective. This is to the detriment of our whole society. In many cases, our society would be safer without a death penalty that drains crime fighting resources. Of course, the death penalty issue will continue to be debated for many years into the future. It is an issue that is at the very heart of the human consciousness, and how we relate to one another and to society as a whole. There will always be advocates of the death penalty and there

The Death Penalty Deters Crime and Saves Lives

1151 words - 5 pages moral, by not allowing criminals to roam the streets once again. It does not discriminate against those of color or the poor, and is actually less expensive than life imprisonment. The most important reason why the death penalty should be legal is because it deters crime. In past centuries, the problem was how to find the most painful way to execute a criminal, not whether criminals should be executed or not. Killing alone wasn’t an acceptable

"Capital Punishment Cannot Prevent Murder" talks about the negative aspects of the death penalty

1396 words - 6 pages Capital Punishment Cannot Prevent MurderCapital punishment has always been a controversial topic. Applied already in the ancient times, executions have always been a part of our lives. Nevertheless, more and more countries abolished this kind of penalty because they started to doubt its fairness and reliability. Amnesty International states on its website that" an average of three countries per year have abolished the death penalty since 1976

Capital Punishment~Right or Wrong? Essay about the different views involving the death penalty and why they might feel that way

646 words - 3 pages Capital punishment, or the death penalty is one of the mostdebated issues in the Criminal Justice Sysem and is a verycontroversial issue among society. The two most commonviews are either completely for or against capitalpunishment. Most arguments against the death penalty arefor moral reason. They view it as cruel and unusualpunishment, whereas aguements for the death penalty say "aneye for an eye."One of the main arguements for capital

Death Penalty: Capital Punishment and Violent Crime

1590 words - 6 pages Capital Punishment and Violent Crime Hypothesis Most Americans are pro-death penalty, even though they don't really believe that it is an effective deterrent to violent crime. Those who are pro-death penalty will remain so, even if faced with the best arguments of anti-death penalty activists and told to assume the arguments were absolutely true. Violent crime Violent crime is a major problem in the United States. According to

Discuss and Evaluate the Arguments For and Against the Use of the Death Penalty.

3024 words - 12 pages if the crime is committed at random the probability of any punishment acting as a deterrent is low. Here you could argue that murder committed under these conditions cannot be punished by death. Given that society has the uppermost concern in preventing murder; it makes sense to use the strongest possible punishment to deter murder, which is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, future murderers might think again

Capital Punishment, specifically, the practice of State administered death as a penalty for any crime requires abolition

1108 words - 4 pages requirement of law as a penalty for capital murder.Nevertheless, if the Old Testament principle, "eye for an eye" suggests the severity of punishments must be proportional to the seriousness of the offense. Murder is the most serious crime. In turn, it requires the strictest punishment. This precept is no doubt solid. Notwithstanding, this supposition does not support the use of death as a penalty. It demands that all crimes be punished with terms

In an essay of 1000 words, and utilising the secondary sources provided, critically discuss how each of the primary sources below might help up us

1006 words - 5 pages limitations with primary sources as Erickson suggests, they still give valuable insight into reasons for migration. Using Fisher’s letters to help understand push-pull theory, we can see that there are many clear reasons as to why he migrated to America, i.e. many ‘pull’ reasons. Fisher talks repeatedly of how fertile and cheap land is in America, and how readily available it is in comparison to in England. Fisher also mentions “the enormous taxation

Punishment for a crime has the purpose of deterring future criminality. Death as a penalty, has been given to serious criminals without solid evidence of its effectiveness to deter serious offenses

2156 words - 9 pages Lee PAGE 2 Sang Won LeeDr SiskDeath Penalty: Unconstitutional, but Legalized MurderPunishment for a crime has the purpose of deterring future criminality. Death as a penalty, has been given to serious criminals without solid evidence of its effectiveness to deter serious offenses. Actually, the crime rate is decreasing in Europe where the death penalty is not imposed, in the United States, on the other hand, where the death penalty is imposed

This essay is an opinion essay about the death penalty

574 words - 2 pages Death PenaltyThe death penalty is the most severe sentence in our legal system. This requires a law official to kill an offender. In many countries the death penalty doesn't exists, but in the United States many states allow the death penalty. Today, there is a big controversy over capital punishment and whether it is morally right. We greatly value our own lives so should the lives of others belong in our hands? Do we possess the right of

Death penalty protection, how people are protected by the death penalty persuasive essay - Philosophy - Philosophy Death penalty

1724 words - 7 pages penalty does not violate the right to life, is an appropriate penalty for murder, and possibly executing someone doesn't necessarily mean “no death penalty is better.” Primoratz major argument throughout his article is that when someone commits an offense he or she deserves to be punished. However, the punishment is ought to be proportionate to the crime. He states, the “the crime of a murder, however, is an exception in this respect, and calls for

Similar Essays

The Death Penalty Is An Effective Weapon Against Crime

1319 words - 5 pages       For years now the Americans have debated over the issue of capital punishment.   Many people believe that it no longer serves out its intended purpose of deterring crime.  Others believe that the death penalty is an inhumane act of violence and that it should be banished from the justice system all together.  The thought of playing God also is another aspect of the situation.  Despite these allegations however, the facts still remain

Discuss How Both Structural And Agency Factors Might Be Involved In Explanations Of Crime

903 words - 4 pages , Kelly, Goldblatt, Hughes, 2007, p.28).In looking further into the explanations of crime, I now outline the individually defined explanations of each approach. The structural approach includes three different theories being biological, family and cultural.The biological explanation argues that patterns of human behaviour can be traced back to an individual’s genetic makeup. (Mooney, Kelly, Goldblatt, Hughes, 2007, p.29-30). It is interesting

The Death Penalty Doesn't Deter Crime

1083 words - 4 pages I would characterize the public opinion on the death penalty as being an uninformed opinion. More people are in favor of the death penalty, now then back a few decades ago. People are not well informed on the statistics of the death penalty, like the number of prisoners, or the racial discrimination etc. I think that if more people were informed that some opinions would be changed. It has been shown that men over women

The Role Of The Death Penalty On Preventing Future Crime

8171 words - 33 pages Does the death penalty prevent future crime? We are scared. Surveys find that the fear of crime is high and perhaps rising. So the question of prevention is important. General deterrence is the idea that punishing an offender "deters" others from committing similar crimes. But does the threat of the death penalty actually discourage others from killing and thus make us safer? If so, does it do so significantly better than other forms of