This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

How Plausible Is The Claim That There Is No Moral Justification For Warfare?

1149 words - 5 pages

Before attempting to justify warfare, we first have to assess the term justice and its significance in warfare. Justice is crucial in this discussion because it has taken over from religion as a basis for moral judgement when fighting a war. Historically, medieval Christian ethics were the justifications for warfare, as was apparent throughout the Crusades. Justice became the highest moral value after the conflict between Christ as a pacifist and the fight to spread Christianity. From this stemmed the principles of the just war tradition. There are seven principles of just war tradition and they are referred to as "ius ad bellum," which translates from Latin to read 'justice of going to war.' This tradition of restrictions has influenced modern declarations and treaties concerning the conduct of war.The word war can have many different meanings: nuclear wars; conventional wars; world wars; civil wars; religious wars; tribal wars; revolutionary wars; trade wars and others. Even if we consider the 'simple' form of a conventional war between two countries, there are certain moral issues that have to be addressed. Was the government justified in committing the country to war? Should the use of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons be undertaken? Can the military authorities use methods of torture on its prisoners?There are as many different degrees of pacifism as there is patriotism but no recognizable version allows killing even as a defensive act. Absolute pacifists agree with the title and say that it is never right to kill another person, however evil the consequences of not doing so. This is due to their key principle being the sanctity of life.Many people take the view that it is always wrong for a government to start a war, but always legitimate for a government to meet external aggression with force. Most people will casually accept the reasons that a government offers for acts of war and these include the people that are readily against abortion and euthanasia on the grounds of a belief in the sanctity of life. "We, as rational humans, regard killing in war as less serious than other deliberate killing." (Glover)Private acts of killing are extremely hard to justify. Wars are killing on a larger scale and are therefore that much harder to justify. The greater the war looks like being, the greater the evil it must avert to be justified. In some cases, there is the danger that a conventional war may escalate into a nuclear one. With all these arguments against war, it is possible that war is sometimes the lesser evil, and perhaps the Second World War was one of those times. Such a decision can only be reached by calculating gains against loses. If other governments had foreseen what the Nazis would do, they would probably have been right to invade Germany to remove Hitler in the early 1930's. This would have avoided far worse calamities that actually took place.Another subject to be considered, once a war is underway, is are there any moral...

Find Another Essay On How plausible is the claim that there is no moral justification for warfare?

"There is not one single Psychological theory that can adequately account for human aggression and violence." To what extent do you agree with this claim?

1548 words - 6 pages advantage, whether to preserve resources or to gain access to more.There are many limitations to all the biological theory they all depend on energy that is immeasurable aggression is very subjective thus can never really be known. All biological theories are supported by empirical observations of human behaviour, the theories rely on circular logic and presenting links that there is no evidence for. The biological theories suffer badly from

This is a reaction paper i did for my speech class and the purpose was to inform someone about a time in my life that really affected me. there is no title for it. enjoy :D

664 words - 3 pages the love of my life.My love life in the past was pretty average for a teenage girl. Had a few boyfriends, most of them did not last that long. But of course there is always that one guy that takes your breath away. His name is Manuel. He puts the twinkle in my eye, the one that makes my heart skip a thousand beats, the one that makes me feel protected when I'm around him. Our relationship was rocky in the beginning, but we managed to pull

Discussing the claim that in today's world the idea of a soveriegn nation is no longer relevant, due to globalisation and long range weapons etc

778 words - 3 pages "Today the idea of the sovereign nation state is no longer relevant." How persuasive is this claim?Today we live in a world of growing internationalism and globalisation. Economies are merging, and supranational bodies such as the United Nations and European Union effect the lives of almost all people on earth. While some applaud these relatively new developments, claiming these pave the route to a peaceful and the only viable method of

In the lord of the flies, Golding wanted to show his readers that there is no such thing as innocence, even in the young

637 words - 3 pages In the lord of the flies, Golding wanted to show his readers that there is no such thing asinnocence, even in the young. Clearly in the text, the first evidence of conflict between Ralph and Jackmanifested itself in the argument they had who was going to keep the fire burning. Respecting orderand pursuing survival desires rather than pleasure was rejected by Jack. Humans follow their instinctswhen they have no technology or the pleasures of

Explain Peter Singer’s argument that there is no morally significant difference between Bob, who decides to let a child die rather than sacrifice

859 words - 4 pages , to compensate for everyone else's moral ineptitude. As long as there is still need, Singer believes people should give up every luxury and put their money towards the basic needs of others. Another possible objection might be that it should be the responsibility of governments to ensure aid money is sourced from taxes. Singer replies that this, once again, makes no difference; you are still morally obligated to assist the starving and cannot

There is no doubt that both Ovid, from Imaginary Life, by David Malouf and William Wordsworth eventually come to appreciate their new surroundings. Discuss

1928 words - 8 pages ESSAY MUSTAFA KHEIR Consequently, they modify their attitudes towards life in civilized societies. William Wordsworth and Ovid do have their similarities in that they love nature from parallel perspectives. However the approach they use in accepting their new surrounding, nature, is different. There is no doubt that Ovid, a character in David Malouf"s book "An Imaginary Life" does accept and appreciate nature, the main catalyst for this

Just Say No To Chocolate-- essay proves that there is no such thing as a chocoholic because to be one would be saying you are an addict. it compares addiction to cravings

715 words - 3 pages say they are chocoholics (Kendall). The term chocoholic means that a person is addicted to chocolate much like a person can be addicted to alcohol. There are many theories as to why chocolate is craved so much but many are just grasping at straws. Although some people may think they are addicted to chocolate, I believe it has no addictive qualities at all.Lexiann, a chocoholic, is obsessed with chocolate. She would rather pick the thorns off

Tis True That There Are No Truths and Absolutely No Absolutes: A Scholarly Report

1121 words - 4 pages combined with observation from the normal senses is the way to acquire knowledge (Felder 119). When attempting to tackle such a daunting subject intellectual perception must be conditioned to see and understand that there is no black and white; that a vast mass of gray areas exist and must be accounted for to validate any argument. Since efforts to prove or disprove that human beings can have truths are oriented on the basis of assumptions about the

"Nickel and Dimed" Essay on the statement "There are no secret economies that nourish the poor; on the contrary, there are a host of special costs."

1082 words - 4 pages Low-Wage Workers" There are no secret economies that nourish the poor; on the contrary, there are a host of special cost", meaning that there isn't any help for the poor but yet they have to pay for everything they need and have. Although it may be true in some cases but I disagree with the statement. The reason why I disagree is because it all depends on the person's situation. As for Barbara Ehrenreich she bases it on her co-workers life on

Is There a Moral Case for Socialism?

2570 words - 10 pages is a crop or a technological invention? The government is merely a collection of individuals, not unlike the producer, placed in a position of mediation. Under what moral obligation can a collection of individuals own that which they did not produce? There is no divinity in any person in an equal and moral state.The majority of people work to pay for food, water, and shelter in addition to extra comforts. It has been illustrated by the attempted

There is no need for the Bill of Rights

1373 words - 5 pages performance of the president is often shaped by outside factors which control how he must act as a Chief Executive. The behavior of presidents come from a number of different criteria. A president's personal character, his approach to the position and circumstances during his term all contribute to presidential behavior.Presidents have approached the office from two vague positions. They have believed, to varying degrees, that either the president has a

Similar Essays

There Is No Justification For The Terror In The U.S.S.R. In The 1930's

1838 words - 7 pages There is No Justification for the Terror in the U.S.S.R. in the 1930's I agree more with the statement ‘There can be no justification for the “terror” in the USSR in the 1930’s. It was motivated purely by Stalin’s lust for power.’ However, I can understand why one could say that terror was essential for the survival of the new

Evaluate The Suggestion That There Is No Ideal Management Style

747 words - 3 pages are more chances for this style to start gaining the characteristics of impoverished style - manager is laxy and wants to lessen responsibility. This would be be effective when there are less risks involved and more time available. Nevertheless, it gradually leads to less innovative ideas and can cause demotivation if employees are unable to shoulder the responsibility. Hence, fro being effecient and productive Laissez-faire should be adopted for theory Y type of workers.To conclude, there is no ideal management style as it's success is determined by the situation and the business environment.

“There Are No Absolute Distinctions Between What Is True And What Is False” Discuss This Claim

1104 words - 5 pages is true and what is false, due to both moral topics overlapping regularly. One could even say in response to Da Vinci’s statement that falsehood and truth go hand in hand. The only clear example one could provide of an absolute distinction between falsehood and truth, which would result in a consensus in the public, is presented in some math topics. Due to each human being having a different perception of reality, there is no one definition of

Do All Dualists Believe That There Is Two Way Causal Interaction Between Mind And Body? Which Version Of Dualism – Cartesian Dualism, Parallelism, Or Epiphenomenalism – Is The Most Plausible Theory Of...

1103 words - 4 pages plausible as a theory of mind due to the nature in which the causal relation from material to immaterial is essentially redundant.A varying view to Cartesian dualism and is very far from the belief of two-way causal interaction between mind and body says that there is basically no connection whatever between any mental phenomena and any physical phenomena. This view is called parallelism. It says that mental and physical worlds exist, in two