This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

How Strong Was The League Of Nations?

616 words - 2 pages

The League of Nations was created from the Treaty of Versailles after WWI. However, unfortunately no countries were willing to create the League of Nations. They joined and created the League because Wilson, the president of one the strongest countries U.S, said he wanted to create a better world. So, the countries in the League seemed lacking of eagerness. How effective was the League of Nations, then?It was true that the League of Nations had contributed to world peace, in spite of the lack of eagerness. For example, they successfully stopped the conflict between Yugoslavia and Albania, and between Finland and Sweden. In addition, they arbitrated between Germany and Poland, Britain and Turkey, and Greece and Bulgaria. Without the League of Nations there were many wars between countries. So, the League of Nations contributed to the peace a lot.And we can't ignore the League's contribution to improving the world condition. For example, they dealt with 1,000,000 POWs, and they freed 200,000 slaves. In addition they cut down on leprosy and malaria, improving people's health. Furthermore, they restrained drugs and banned opium trade. This improved the world condition a lot and made world closer to today's one that has better heath care, no drug, and human rights. So, the League of Nations had good effects in certain aspects.However there were many failure of League of Nations, too. For example, Corfu was a specific failure. This conflict was between Italy and Greece, and it was obvious that Italy should be blamed. But the League of Nations asked Greece to pay and apology to Italy, because Italy gave more money than Greece to the League. This shows that the League had not much power because they chose money instead of justice. So, League of Nations received bad reputation because of this.Corfu is only an example and there were much...

Find Another Essay On How strong was the League of Nations?

To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920's?

646 words - 3 pages establishing organizations to help the population all over the world. They showed the nations that it was not a mistake to found the League of Nations. Although they did not do good work in the 1930's the showed everyone how good they worked during the 1920's.

Why was the League of Nations unable to stop Japan taking over Manchuria in the 1930s?

1702 words - 7 pages The League of Nations was an international organisation formed in 1920 with its primary objective being to uphold world peace and promote collective security. This was based on the idea that if one of the League’s members was invaded, the other countries would stand up against the aggressor together. The League had a variety of successes, including settling the Aaland Islands dispute between Sweden and Finland, as well as failures, such as the

Which was more important as a reason for the failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's? The absence of the USA or Britain and France's self interest

574 words - 2 pages The failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's was due to two main reasons.Firstly, the absence of the USA. The League of Nations was thought up by the American president Woodrow Wilson it was one of his 14 points. He had come up with the idea, the League was in a sense his child, yet he was allowed no part in it. The American congress had refused to become members of The League and this caused all sorts of problems. America had the biggest

The League of Nations

1292 words - 5 pages against the idea, because they were German, and Germany was forbid to be part of the League. The German-Americans didn't like how the League is treating Germany so therefore they didn't want to be part of it.The League of Nations had many problems in 1919. The main problem was that other countries didn't trust the league. Other countries didn't trust the League because United States didn't join, and they were the ones who came up with the idea

The League of Nations

1569 words - 6 pages questions include the main aims of the league, countries not being in the league and how it weakened it and explaining how successful the league was in 1920's and 30's.In January 1918 Woodrow Wilson set up 14 points which included a very important one, number 14 was 'An international organisation to be set up to protect the independence of countries and settle disputes' which was to be called 'The League of Nations' and the 14 points, Woodrow

The League Of Nations

752 words - 4 pages The League of Nations, a former international organization, was formed after World War I to promote international peace and security. The basis of the League, also called the Covenant, was written into the Treaty of Versailles and other peace treaties and provided for an assembly, a council, and a secretariat. Because the peace treaties had created the League of Nations, the League was bound to uphold their principles. but however, it became

The League of Nations

680 words - 3 pages At The treaty of Versailles, Woodrow Wilson, president of the USA gave 14 points to settle world peace, even though some of his points were rejected, the most important one which consisted of creating a 'League of Nations' was accepted. The League was formed on 1920, the aims of the League where to maintain peace and security in the world by countries acting together to stop war, this was called collective security. Some of the world powers were

Assess the Significance of the League Nations

2139 words - 9 pages 1923 as the Germans had not paid the reparations set by the treaty of Versailles. The league had not been consulted and Britain even opposed the invasion. The impotence of the League of Nations leads some to say that the league's significance was how insignificant it was. This supports the claim it helped people figure out the right way to set up a universal organization. Walters adds, 'Before the League, it was held both in theory and practice

Ghost of the League of Nations

593 words - 2 pages The League of Nations was created with the aim of linking up the world and making it a peaceful place, but there was a massive amount of problems that caused it to the road of failure, but why was is it doomed to fail?The primary factor that caused the League of Nations to fail was its leading countries. Thomas Woodrow Wilson, the president of America at the time was the one that brought up the idea of League of Nations, but they didn't even

Questions on The League of Nations

492 words - 2 pages action, when they weren't willing to act themselves, so it wasn't realistic to expect nations to obey a weak body. The League was dominated by Britain and France but they never agreed on how it should be run. Also it required a unanimous vote in the Council to make a resolution. Because of this, effective action was difficult and often impossible. The league was also slow in coming to its decisions as certain decisions needed unanimous agreements of


885 words - 4 pages support Greece against Italy if there were got killed British civilians ("corfu occupied after bombardment; 15 greek civilians killed, many wounded") The very next day Greece appealed to the League of Nations for help. Antonio Salandra the Italian representative to the League said that he was not allowed to discuss the crisis. Mussolini refused to co-operate in the beginning with the League of Nations. After some days he accepted and he demanded that

Similar Essays

The League Of Nations Was A Success

551 words - 2 pages The League of Nations managed to keep a lot of items going and introduced co-operation between countries in the 1920'sIn my opinion the League of Nations was a success I will discuss my reasons in this essay.The aims of the League of Nations were to discourage aggression, to encourage co-operation, disarmament and to improve working conditions for everyone in the world.The League of Nations was set up because after the First World War everyone

Was The League Of The Nations A Stupid Idea?

1545 words - 7 pages failure inevitable. Those ideas that were used to form the organization eventually made the general idea of the establishment of the League of Nations also stupid and pointless. There is no doubt that in the beginning the League of Nations was a significant attempt to preserve the global peace between European major powers. However, most importantly, we should notice how the plans carried out by the League made the whole organization worthless

Was The League Of Nations A Success Or A Failure?

3786 words - 15 pages warning was given to the offender to leave the invaded territory or else. Second step was to impose Economic sanctions on the country. This meant that all the member countries had to completely stop trade with the offending Nation and push it towards bankruptcy. But how was this possible when all the member countries were busy rebuilding the nations? This was one of the reasons why the US did not join the League. Third step was to impose Physical

How Successful Was The League Of Nations In The 1920's? This Essay Analyses The Problems And Difficulties Of The First Attempt Of A World Security Organization

743 words - 3 pages How successful was the league in the 1920's?The League of Nations main aim was in: "stopping wars, improving people's lives and jobs, in encouraging disarmament and in enforcing the decisions made in the peace Treaty of Versailles."If we consider the above statement to judge the successes of the league, we may say that when the League was called to settle a quarrel in the 1920s, it has always been quite successful.The most important successes