This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

How The Federalist And Anti Federalist Papers Led To The Ratification Of The Articles Of Confederation

1358 words - 5 pages

In 1787, there was a controversy over whether there should be a ratification of the constitution or not. Many peoples opinion varied on the subject. The Federalists believed that the Articles of Confederation were a failure and that we needed to rewrite the constitution. The Anti-Federalists had a different opinion; they believed that we shouldn’t ratify the constitution.Shortly after the states sent the constitution to be ratified in late September 1787, an article was published in a New York paper. The article was an anti-federalist article written by an author who went under the pen name Cato. Cato was suspected to be George Clinton who served as vice president under James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. This was the first articled published trying to convince the people of the United States that there was no need to ratify the constitution. This began a long feud between federalist and anti-federalist. Another anti-federalist article was published October 18th 1787 by an author going under a different pen name of Brutus. Brutus was believed to be Robert Yates who was a well known anti-federalist. The name Brutus came from Marcus Junius Brutus who helped in the assassination of Julius Caesar. These articles had had one purpose, to convince the citizens that there was no need to ratify our constitution.In response to these articles Alexander Hamilton wrote the essay Federalist #1. The essay was published in The Independent Journal under the pen name Publius. Publius is short for Publius Valerious Puplicola, which means friend of the people in roman. The pen name was good for the authors because they made it seem like they were trying to help the people. The article was considered an introduction to more articles to come later. For the other articles he recruited to John Jay and James Madison. John Jay had a very little contribution because he fell ill and was unable to help with the articles. Gouverneur Morris and William Duer were also candidates to be other authors in the series of Federalist essays. Morris turned down the offer extended to him by Hamilton and Duer sent three Federalist letters to Hamilton but Hamilton rejected all 3.The authors continued to argue through there public articles. They published one after another debating against each other. The Federalist #1 gave 6 specific topics the 85 federalist articles would cover.The first topic was “The utility of the union to your political prosperity” This meant that with the new constitution there would be good political success. The Federalist strongly believed that with a new constitution that the country would be much stronger and able to function properly. This topic was covered in articles #2 through #14.The second topic was “The insufficiency of the present Confederation to preserve that Union" This topic was simply based around how poorly the Articles of Confederation were written. The idea was that with no central government power that the country would be...

Find Another Essay On How the federalist and anti-federalist papers led to the ratification of the articles of confederation

The Federalist Papers and the Birth of a Nation

1268 words - 5 pages “the few versus the many”. The question of how a democracy lead by a few people would fail to materialize into an aristocracy was firmly addressed within the Federalist papers, notably number 57. Madison argues that limited terms as well as the heavy involvement by the population would keep the few elected from trampling the rights and interests of the many. While a distinct class system fails to materialize in the Constitution, a layered system

The Federalist Papers and The Hamilton Report

1589 words - 7 pages successes the Federalist Party has participated in thus far; the Federalist Papers and the Hamilton Reports. The Federalist Papers were 85 documents co-written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in order to make known the importance of having a new Constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation. These three men opted to remain anonymous under the pseudonym of “Publius” but were eventually discovered to be the authors in 1792

Reasons the Articles of Confederation led to the ratification of the Constitution: Why did the Articles fail? Did the constitution solve the problems?

942 words - 4 pages After America had declared independence from Great Britain in 1776, the next step was to construct a new set of government laws to govern the new nation. This was a task left up to the Confederation Congress, who adopted the Articles of Confederation in 1781. The Articles of Confederation were a good idea in theory, but when put into use by the colonies proved to be weak, and failed.The Articles failed for many reasons. One of the main reasons

Impact of the Federalist Papers on the Constitution

1264 words - 6 pages The Federalist papers were created and ratified in the years of 1787 to 1788. They were made mainly by two of the most influential guys of the post-Revolution duration. It aided the fledgling nation produce a whole and agreeably sturdy main federal government: Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist which wrote fifty-six papers, and James Madison, a Democratic Republican politician who composed twenty-one papers; John Jay likewise contributed with the

Aristotle's Legacy in the Federalist Papers

2047 words - 8 pages eighty-five essays, these arguments came to be called the Federalist Papers, addressing matters ranging from the reasons for the inability of the then-present Confederation to survive as it existed to the purpose and organization of the judicial, legislative, and executive branches of the proposed new government. If the question were posed as to whether the writers of the Federalist Papers were in some way influenced by Aristotle, one would

Federalist papers

1441 words - 6 pages fact that the State of New York gain independence under the Articles of Confederation and was becoming rich trough the trade. The citizens of this state believed that they have no interest in ratifying the Constitution and joining the Union. The writers of The Federalist Papers were very concerned that because of New York’s reluctance and decided to take the matter into their hands and came all the efforts in order to change their minds. They

federalist vs. anti-Federalist

985 words - 4 pages . They agreed on topics like the need to separate checks and balances. They also agreed on defense, foreign trading and interstate commerce. Together, they wanted to maintain order within the states but just didn't know how to go about it. These too parties have great differences and they spoke up for which right they believed was right. The Anti-Federalist who was defending the people of the community within the states has shown they won, by their

An Essay Concerning The Creation of Government Using the early American texts (e.g., The Federalist Papers)

3451 words - 14 pages . In accordance with Madison's sentiments, "the influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular States but will be unable to spread a general conflagration through the other states" (Madison, 114). While an anti-federalist system promotes factionalism which can only serve to destroy a nation, a federalist system of government instead serves to protect and promote the interests of the greater whole while allowing for fair

Madison vs. Jefferson: On the Issue of Constitutional Conflict in the Federalist Papers

1398 words - 6 pages In the Federalist Papers, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson discuss the issue of constitutional conflict, specifically the encroachment by any one branch of the government on another. Jefferson proposes a method for resolving such a conflict between the Judicial, the Legislative, and/or the Executive branch of government. His proposal states that ``whenever any two of the three branches of government shall concur in opinion, each by the voices

Federalist Papers 10 and 51

825 words - 4 pages The Federalist Papers are articles and essays that were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. The eighty-five essays outlined the way that the new government would operate. The Federalist Papers were published in the New York City newspapers under the pen name Publius, they emerged from late 1787 through 1788. The authors of the Federalist Papers explained why

An Analysis of Federalist Papers 10 and 51

959 words - 4 pages Federalist Papers 10 and 51 served to explain the union as a safeguard against factions and insurrection and to explain how the structure of this new union must encompass the ability to furnish proper checks and balances between the different departments within itself respectively. These articles contain absolutely no higher meaning concerning Plato’s beliefs of the True, Good and the Beautiful. The articles are merely rhetoric used to

Similar Essays

Evaluation Of The Federalist Papers

1226 words - 5 pages A new country, a government not properly established and so many ideas and model on how the government should look like whose idea is to be chosen. During the time that the federalist paper was written, there were many group out there not just the federalist but also the anti-federalist, the brutes and the centennial. Everyone having their own ideas and counters for each other’s argument. The federalist paper was somewhat a model on hut that

Summary Of The "Federalist Papers"

934 words - 4 pages Confederation was unable to effectively protect individual liberties because it did not act directly upon the people, and had no authority to enforce its laws.One of the biggest problems resulting from the Articles of Confederation was that there was no means to enforce unity amongst the states. This led to competition between the states over land, commerce, and repayment of public debt. Over time, this would naturally lead to further competition

The Federalist/Anti Federalist Debate Essay

1951 words - 8 pages 1/7 U.S. Government and Politics - Prof. Struening and Prof. Shuster. 09/30/2014 Marie PICHARD - Exchange student The Federalist/Anti-Federalist Debate - Paper After the Declaration of Independence of 1776, it became obvious to write a text to fix the rules of the new government. Thus, the articles of Confederation were established in 1777. A weak central government was created so that the states kept the majority of the power. But the articles

The Similarities And Differences Between The Federalist And Anti Federalist Papers

989 words - 4 pages The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers played a major role in US History. They dealt with many problems in politics. The papers were made after the Revolutionary war. People started to worry that the government would not last under the Articles of Confederation. Without having a backup plan just yet, some delegates met up and created the Constitution. The constitution had to be ratified before it became the rule of all the land. The