One of the most complicated representative democracies that can be observed in our world is the government of the United States of America. It has a system of three branches that is said to be the reason of its successful performance. This system allows each of the branches to function independently and separately and prevents any significant power of one of the branches over the others (Pildes, 2009). The legislative branch or sector has two divisions; the senate and House of Representatives. Acting as counter balances, it proved exteremely effective that the legislatures are bicameral.
Tending to represent the requirements of the individual state in which they are representatives of, the senate is less interacting to the population's requirements unlike the members of the House of Representatives who interact with the requirements of their district's population (Wowro, 2010). The senate is known as the most significant deliberative body in the world and this is said to lead to stalemates. Accordingly, the two major parties of the USA, Republican and Democratic parties, have employed filibuster to avoid the votes of Senate on legislations selected or nominations.
During the last twenty years, the use of filibuster legislation's has effectively become more common and more popular. The "gridlock" term might be thought of having dreadful kind of connotation but I believe that it's essential, in a way, for the debates on important issues. “The filibuster is a perfect candidate for this line of questioning: So what?” Rawls stated in his article (Batch, 2010).
The use of filibuster in Senate is to maintain the right to debate and modify legislations for Senators and this means maintaining the American's interests (Pildes, 2009). Intending to slow down the process of legislation for the Senate, the Founders wanted to assure inquiry and deliberation as a substitution to the rule of majority (Wowro, 2010).
I will be reviewing the nuclear option concept briefly, along with its extreme essence. This option makes possible for a simple majority to overrule the Senate's procedural rules and stop any delaying tactic or filibuster. Never called down, the nuclear option has always been nothing but a threat. It will definitely make a change to the Senate's procedural rules and consequently preventing any filibusters in future if this option is called down.
It might be of a benefit to the party that called down this option at first but the change in the rules that will take place in this process might prevent the party in the future and the opposition at the present time (Wowro, 2010). Not many Senators will accept such a derogation of their powers as it will be considered unforesightful (Pildes, 2009).
Five fair reasons are referred to in this essay that the deploying filibuster will eliminate the despotism of majorities in senate. A single reason of the five and an essential one includes the process of nominating presidents.
It is uttered that the influence...